Sponsor study identifier
observational
31
1 country
1
Study Start
October 1, 2022
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 20, 2024
Actual (reported)This study aims to evaluate the viability and therapeutic efficacy of zero-fluoroscopy radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) using the superior vena cava (SVC) approach in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). The study compares outcomes between the SVC approach and the conventional inferior vena cava (IVC) approach. Patients diagnosed with AVNRT who underwent RFCA between June 2022 and October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measure is the non-inducibility of AVNRT, while secondary outcomes include postoperative recovery time and complication rates. The study seeks to provide a safer and more efficient RFCA method, enhancing patient recovery by minimizing radiation exposure and optimizing catheter access routes.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 20, 2024
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
October 1, 2022
Actual (reported)October 1, 2023
Actual (reported)June 20, 2024
Actual (reported)July 2, 2024
Actual (reported)July 9, 2024
Actual (reported)Non-inducibility of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia (AVNRT)
This is determined during the procedure by performing programmed stimulation to test for the presence of AVNRT. Non-inducibility is confirmed if AVNRT cannot be induced following the ablation, indicating a successful therapeutic intervention.
During the procedure
Recurrence of supraventricular tachycardia
It is defined as any documented episode of supraventricular tachycardia, such as AVNRT, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter, confirmed by electrocardiographic evidence.
Within 1 year post-procedure
Postoperative Recovery Time
Within 24 hours post-procedure
Complication Rate
Within 1 year post-procedure
This group includes patients who underwent zero-fluoroscopy radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using the superior vena cava (SVC) approach. The catheter was inserted through the median cubital vein or basilic vein, navigating through the axillary vein, subclavian vein, and brachiocephalic vein to reach the SVC. The ablation procedure was performed under conscious sedation and local infiltration anesthesia, with a large-tip electrode catheter used for mapping and ablation guided by the EnSite NavX system. The ablation parameters were set at 40 W power and 50°C temperature.
This group includes patients who underwent zero-fluoroscopy radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using the inferior vena cava (IVC) approach. The catheter was inserted through the femoral vein, extending through the iliac vein to the IVC. The ablation procedure was performed under conscious sedation and local infiltration anesthesia, with a large-tip electrode catheter used for mapping and ablation guided by the EnSite NavX system. The ablation parameters were set at 40 W power and 50°C temperature.
Patients undergo zero-fluoroscopy RFCA for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) using the superior vena cava (SVC) or inferior vena cava (IVC) approach. The procedure is performed under conscious sedation and local infiltration anesthesia. A large-tip electrode catheter is used for mapping and ablation, guided by the EnSite NavX system, with ablation parameters set at 40 W power and 50°C temperature.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
The study population includes adults (age \>18 years) diagnosed with AVNRT who underwent RFCA at our institution between June and October 2022. Patients were divided into two groups based on catheter access site: the SVC approach group (median cubital or basilic vein) and the IVC approach group (femoral vein). Inclusion required at least one AVNRT episode during TEAP and programmed stimulation. Exclusion criteria were reversible causes of AVNRT, other tachycardias, severe comorbidities, or contraindications for conscious sedation or local anesthesia. This setup allows comparative analysis of SVC and IVC approaches focusing on success, complications, and recovery.
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
31 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
July 2, 2024
First Posted
July 9, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2022
Actual (reported)European Multicenter Study Radiofrequency (RF) Versus Cryo in Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia (AVNRT)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 20, 2024
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 9, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: