NCT06491017

Brief Summary

Retention of airway secretions is a frequent complication in critically ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (MV).This complication is often due to excessive secretion production and ineffective secretion clearance. Mechanical insufflator-exsufflator (MI-E) is a respiratory physiotherapy technique that aims to assist or simulate a normal cough by using an electro-mechanical dedicated device. A positive airway pressure is delivered to the airways, in order to hyperinflate the lungs, followed by a rapid change to negative pressure that promotes a rapid exhalation and enhances peak expiratory flows. However, there is no consensus on the best MI-E settings to facilitate secretion clearance in these patients. Inspiratory and expiratory pressures of ±40 cmH2O and inspiratory-expiratory time of 3 and 2 seconds, respectively, are often used as a standard for MI-E programming in the daily routine practice, but recent laboratory studies have shown significant benefits when MI-E setting is optimized to promote an expiratory flow bias. The investigators designed this study to compare the effects of MI-E with an optimized setting versus a standard setting on the wet volume of suctioned sputum in intubated critically ill patients on invasive MV for more than 48 hours.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Sep 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress55%
Sep 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Mechanical insufflation-exsufflationPhysiotherapyMucus retentionmechanical ventilation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Wet volume of sputum

    Airway suctioning will be carried out using an open aspiration procedure, using a 12French catheter connected to a sterile collection container. The suction procedure will be performed according to international guidelines . If necessary, 5 ml of saline solution will be used to rinse the catheter in case of impacted secretions inside the catheter; later this volume will be subtracted from the final volume of secretions, thus obtaining the exact amount of wet sputum.

    Immediately after each intervention

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Respiratory parameters: Inspiratory flow (PIF)

    Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated

  • Respiratory parameters: Peak expiratory flow (PEF)

    Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated

  • Respiratory parameters: difference between PEF-PIF;

    Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated

  • Respiratory parameters: PEF:PIF ratio

    Before and during MI-E interventions, delivered tidal volumes will be recorded, PIF and PEF will be assessed for each insufflation-exsufflation cycle, and the PEF-PIF difference and the PEF:PIF ratio will be calculated

  • Pulmonary mechanics parameters: Static Compliance (Cst)

    Airway pressures will be recorded before, immediately after MI-E intervention, after endotracheal suctioning, and 1h after endotracheal suctioning. Respiratory system compliance and airway resistance will be calculated using standard formulas.

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (7)

  • Demographic variables: Age

    Through study completion

  • Demographic variables: Gender

    Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  • Demographic variables: Weight

    Through study completion, an average of 2 years.

  • +4 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

MI-E intervention protocol

EXPERIMENTAL

The optimized MI-E setting will consist of in-expiratory pressures defined during the previous short-period test to achieve inspiratory volumes of ≥1 liter and PEF ≥80 L/min

Device: MI-E Intervention protocol

Standard MI-E setting

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard MI-E setting will consist of in-expiratory pressures of +40/-40 cmH2O, medium inspiratory flow, with 3 seconds and 2 seconds of in-expiratory time, respectively, and 1-second pause

Device: Standard MI-E setting

Interventions

The endotracheal tube cuff will be inflated to 40 cmH2O and MI-E device will be used to deliver MI-E in automatic mode, with 4 sets of 5 respiratory cycles each and a 1-minute interval between each set. Before initiation of the MI-E intervention protocol, the investigators will carry out a short-period test to find the appropriate MI-E settings to achieve inspiratory volumes of ≥1 liter and PEF ≥80 L/min. Concretely, inspiratory and expiratory time will always be set at 4 seconds and 2 seconds, respectively, and inspiratory flow will always be in slow mode. Once the appropriate inspiratory pressure will be found, the expiratory pressure will be initially set to exceed in 30 cmH2O the inspiratory pressure and, if required, this will be increased by 5 cmH2O until achieving a PEF ≥80 L/min with a maximum expiratory pressure of 70 cmH2O.

MI-E intervention protocol

Cough Assist E70 device (Philips Respironics, USA, Andover, Massachusetts) will be used to deliver MI-E in automatic mode, with 4 sets of 5 respiratory cycles each and a 1-minute interval between each set. During the 1-minute pause between sets, the patient will be reconnected to the ventilator to avoid desaturation and de-recruitment during procedures. PEEP will remain stable during the protocol. The standard MI-E setting will consist of in-expiratory pressures of +40/-40 cmH2O, medium inspiratory flow, with 3 seconds and 2 seconds of in-expiratory time, respectively, and 1-second pause.

Standard MI-E setting

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults (\> 18yo).
  • Endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation for \> 48h and active humidification for \> 24h.
  • Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale -3 to -5.
  • Signed informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with hemodynamic instability (MAP \< 60 or \> 110, Heart Rate \< 50 or \> 130, new onset arrhythmias), respiratory instability (PEEP \> 12cmH2O, SpO2 \< 90% or fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) \> 60%).
  • Undrained pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum.
  • Unstable intracranial pressure (ICP \> 20mmHg or MAP \< 60).
  • Severe bronchospasm.
  • Post cardiothoracic surgical patients.
  • Active pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Bronchoesophageal or bronchopleural fistulas.
  • Prone position.
  • Pregnancy.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

Barcelona, 08036, Spain

Location

Related Publications (23)

  • Konrad F, Schreiber T, Brecht-Kraus D, Georgieff M. Mucociliary transport in ICU patients. Chest. 1994 Jan;105(1):237-41. doi: 10.1378/chest.105.1.237.

    PMID: 8275739BACKGROUND
  • Sackner MA, Hirsch J, Epstein S. Effect of cuffed endotracheal tubes on tracheal mucous velocity. Chest. 1975 Dec;68(6):774-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.68.6.774.

    PMID: 1192854BACKGROUND
  • Gal TJ. Effects of endotracheal intubation on normal cough performance. Anesthesiology. 1980 Apr;52(4):324-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198004000-00008.

    PMID: 7362053BACKGROUND
  • Kilgour E, Rankin N, Ryan S, Pack R. Mucociliary function deteriorates in the clinical range of inspired air temperature and humidity. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1491-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2235-3. Epub 2004 Mar 16.

    PMID: 15024566BACKGROUND
  • American Association for Respiratory Care; Restrepo RD, Walsh BK. Humidification during invasive and noninvasive mechanical ventilation: 2012. Respir Care. 2012 May;57(5):782-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01766.

    PMID: 22546299BACKGROUND
  • Li Bassi G, Zanella A, Cressoni M, Stylianou M, Kolobow T. Following tracheal intubation, mucus flow is reversed in the semirecumbent position: possible role in the pathogenesis of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):518-25. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000299741.32078.E9.

    PMID: 18176317BACKGROUND
  • Wu MF, Wang TY, Chen DS, Hsiao HF, Hu HC, Chung FT, Lin TY, Lin SM. The effects of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on lung function and complications in cardiac surgery patients: a pilot study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Dec 9;16(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01738-x.

    PMID: 34886881BACKGROUND
  • Kuroiwa R, Tateishi Y, Oshima T, Inagaki T, Furukawa S, Takemura R, Kawasaki Y, Murata A. Mechanical Insufflation-exsufflation for the Prevention of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Units: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan;25(1):62-66. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23508.

    PMID: 33603304BACKGROUND
  • Pneumatikos IA, Dragoumanis CK, Bouros DE. Ventilator-associated pneumonia or endotracheal tube-associated pneumonia? An approach to the pathogenesis and preventive strategies emphasizing the importance of endotracheal tube. Anesthesiology. 2009 Mar;110(3):673-80. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819868e0.

    PMID: 19212256BACKGROUND
  • Shapiro M, Wilson RK, Casar G, Bloom K, Teague RB. Work of breathing through different sized endotracheal tubes. Crit Care Med. 1986 Dec;14(12):1028-31. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198612000-00007.

    PMID: 3780244BACKGROUND
  • Branson RD. Secretion management in the mechanically ventilated patient. Respir Care. 2007 Oct;52(10):1328-42; discussion 1342-7.

    PMID: 17894902BACKGROUND
  • Martinez-Alejos R, Marti JD, Li Bassi G, Gonzalez-Anton D, Pilar-Diaz X, Reginault T, Wibart P, Ntoumenopoulos G, Tronstad O, Gabarrus A, Quinart A, Torres A. Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation on Sputum Volume in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Subjects. Respir Care. 2021 Sep;66(9):1371-1379. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08641. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

    PMID: 34103385BACKGROUND
  • Rose L, McKim D, Leasa D, Nonoyama M, Tandon A, Kaminska M, O'Connell C, Loewen A, Connolly B, Murphy P, Hart N, Road J. Monitoring Cough Effectiveness and Use of Airway Clearance Strategies: A Canadian and UK Survey. Respir Care. 2018 Dec;63(12):1506-1513. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06321. Epub 2018 Sep 11.

    PMID: 30206128BACKGROUND
  • Goni-Viguria R, Yoldi-Arzoz E, Casajus-Sola L, Aquerreta-Larraya T, Fernandez-Sangil P, Guzman-Unamuno E, Moyano-Berardo BM. Respiratory physiotherapy in intensive care unit: Bibliographic review. Enferm Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2018 Oct-Dec;29(4):168-181. doi: 10.1016/j.enfi.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Jun 15. English, Spanish.

    PMID: 29910086BACKGROUND
  • Swingwood E, Tume L, Cramp F. A survey examining the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation on adult intensive care units across the UK. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020 Nov;21(4):283-289. doi: 10.1177/1751143719870121. Epub 2019 Sep 5.

    PMID: 34093728BACKGROUND
  • Sanchez-Garcia M, Santos P, Rodriguez-Trigo G, Martinez-Sagasti F, Farina-Gonzalez T, Del Pino-Ramirez A, Cardenal-Sanchez C, Busto-Gonzalez B, Requesens-Solera M, Nieto-Cabrera M, Romero-Romero F, Nunez-Reiz A. Preliminary experience on the safety and tolerability of mechanical "insufflation-exsufflation" in subjects with artificial airway. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018 Apr 3;6(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40635-018-0173-6.

    PMID: 29616357BACKGROUND
  • Volpe MS, Naves JM, Ribeiro GG, Ruas G, Amato MBP. Airway Clearance With an Optimized Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Maneuver. Respir Care. 2018 Oct;63(10):1214-1222. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05965. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

    PMID: 30018177BACKGROUND
  • Volpe MS, Guimaraes FS, Morais CC. Airway Clearance Techniques for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Insights for Optimization. Respir Care. 2020 Aug;65(8):1174-1188. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07904.

    PMID: 32712584BACKGROUND
  • Rose L, Adhikari NK, Leasa D, Fergusson DA, McKim D. Cough augmentation techniques for extubation or weaning critically ill patients from mechanical ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 11;1(1):CD011833. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011833.pub2.

    PMID: 28075489BACKGROUND
  • Benditt JO. Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation: More Than Just Cough Assist. Respir Care. 2018 Aug;63(8):1076-1077. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06439. No abstract available.

    PMID: 30045899BACKGROUND
  • Chatwin M, Simonds AK. Long-Term Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation Cough Assistance in Neuromuscular Disease: Patterns of Use and Lessons for Application. Respir Care. 2020 Feb;65(2):135-143. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06882. Epub 2019 Nov 5.

    PMID: 31690614BACKGROUND
  • Ferreira de Camillis ML, Savi A, Goulart Rosa R, Figueiredo M, Wickert R, Borges LGA, Galant L, Teixeira C. Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation on Airway Mucus Clearance Among Mechanically Ventilated ICU Subjects. Respir Care. 2018 Dec;63(12):1471-1477. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06253. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

    PMID: 30018175BACKGROUND
  • Marti JD, Martinez-Alejos R, Pilar-Diaz X, Yang H, Pagliara F, Battaglini D, Meli A, Yang M, Bobi J, Rigol M, Tronstad O, Volpe MS, Passos Amato MB, Bassi GL, Torres A. Effects of Mechanical Insufflation-Exsufflation With Different Pressure Settings on Respiratory Mucus Displacement During Invasive Ventilation. Respir Care. 2022 Dec;67(12):1508-1516. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10173. Epub 2022 Aug 30.

    PMID: 36041752BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Joan Daniel Martí, PhD

    Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Dani M Romeu, PhD

CONTACT

Gonzalo Basllesteros Reviriego, Msc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2024

First Posted

July 8, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations