Reliability of Minimally Trained Operator's Velocity-Time Integral Measurement Guided by Artificial Intelligence VTI
MiniTrainedVTI
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Stroke volume is a major determinant of tissue perfusion and therefore a key parameter to monitor in patients with hemodynamic instability and hypoperfusion. Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) Velocity-Time Integral (VTI) measured using pulsed wave Doppler is widely used as an estimation of stroke volume and should be a competence required for every Intensive Care Unit (ICU) physician. Recently, research in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applied to medical imaging constituted a breakthrough in the acquisition of images. The goal of the present study is to characterize and quantify the reliability and reproducibility of LVOT VTI measurements by comparing the measures obtained by minimally-trained operators and expert physicians, guided by UltraSight AI software.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 14, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2026
April 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.5 years
June 27, 2024
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Relative difference expressed in percentage of LVOT VTI measurement evaluated by the minimally trained operators as compared with LVOT VTI measurement by experts.
To assess the equivalence of measures of LVOT VTI obtained by minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by the experts, both guided by artificial intelligence. Both measures of VTI pre and post-fluid challenge will be considered.
Less than 60 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (7)
The relative difference expressed in percentage of LVOT VTI measurement, pre-fluid challenge, evaluated by the minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by experts.
Less than 60 minutes
The relative difference expressed in percentage of LVOT VTI measurement, post-fluid challenge, evaluated by the minimally trained operators as compared with those obtained by experts.
Less than 60 minutes
Difference in the VTI variation [i.e.: % change after a fluid challenge of 250 mL, or a passive leg-raising test] obtained by the minimally-trained operators and that obtained by experts.
Less than 60 minutes
Correlation of the measure of the VTI variation before and after a fluid challenge of 250 mL or after a passive leg-raising test between the minimally trained operators and the experts.
Less than 60 minutes
Difference of the absolute value of the measure of LVOT VTI obtained by the minimally trained operators and the experts.
Less than 60 minutes
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Minimally-trained operators
OTHERGroup A: Minimally trained operators for LVOT VTI measurement will be intensive care residents and medical students having done less than 20 transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). All untrained operators will benefit from a standardized preliminary minimal training to teach them how to obtain apical 5-chamber view and acquire LVOT VTI using pulsed-wave Doppler according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography.
Expert operators
OTHERGroup B: Experts are ICU attending physicians considered experienced and competent in TTE (either board certified or considered as experts locally). Experts will also be trained in using the same ultrasound platform equipped with the Ultrasight AI software. All operators will be trained on the same ultrasound platform: Philips Lumify® equipped with the Ultrasight AI software to optimize the quality of the 5-chamber views.
Interventions
Patients in whom fluid administration is considered necessary, based on hypoperfusion criteria will be included in the trial. One member of group A and one of group B will proceed independently to evaluate LVOT VTI, guided by the UltraSight AI software to obtain the best 5-chamber view. The measure of LVOT VTI will be calculated as the average of three consecutive cardiac cycles. The order of acquisition between group A and B will be randomized. Each operator will be blinded to the values obtained by the other. After baseline LVOT VTI measurement, a 250 mL fluid challenge of crystalloids or a passive leg raising test (non-pharmacological and reversible fluid challenge of roughly 250 mL), depending on the appreciation of the clinician will be performed. Measurements will be repeated immediately after the fluid challenge by the same operators, still blinded to each other, guided by the UltraSight AI software. The order of the 2nd acquisition will be the same as the 1st acquisition
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients aged 18 and more
- Hospitalized in ICU, in whom fluid administration is considered necessary by the clinician in charge, based on the presence of hypoperfusion criterion:
- \>10% decrease in mean arterial pressure with respect to baseline value
- Skin mottling, oliguria (\<0,5 ml/kg/h)
- change in the level of consciousness
- hyperlactatemia
- decrease in central venous oxygen saturation Affiliation to a French social security system (beneficiary or legal) Participant's or next of kin non-opposition or emergency procedure
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with atrial fibrillation, due to the higher variability in LVOT VTI; Patient on Emergency Medical Assistance; Patient under guardianship, curatorship, deprived of liberty.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Parislead
- Philips Healthcarecollaborator
- UltraSightcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, 87042, France
Hôpital Lariboisière - APHP
Paris, 75010, France
Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou - APHP
Paris, 75015, France
Related Publications (7)
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PMID: 25392034BACKGROUNDMercado P, Maizel J, Beyls C, Titeca-Beauport D, Joris M, Kontar L, Riviere A, Bonef O, Soupison T, Tribouilloy C, de Cagny B, Slama M. Transthoracic echocardiography: an accurate and precise method for estimating cardiac output in the critically ill patient. Crit Care. 2017 Jun 9;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1737-7.
PMID: 28595621BACKGROUNDExpert Round Table on Echocardiography in ICU. International consensus statement on training standards for advanced critical care echocardiography. Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):654-66. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3228-5. Epub 2014 Mar 11. No abstract available.
PMID: 24615559BACKGROUNDRobba C, Wong A, Poole D, Al Tayar A, Arntfield RT, Chew MS, Corradi F, Doufle G, Goffi A, Lamperti M, Mayo P, Messina A, Mongodi S, Narasimhan M, Puppo C, Sarwal A, Slama M, Taccone FS, Vignon P, Vieillard-Baron A; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine task force for critical care ultrasonography*. Basic ultrasound head-to-toe skills for intensivists in the general and neuro intensive care unit population: consensus and expert recommendations of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Dec;47(12):1347-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06486-z. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
PMID: 34787687BACKGROUNDMor-Avi V, Khandheria B, Klempfner R, Cotella JI, Moreno M, Ignatowski D, Guile B, Hayes HJ, Hipke K, Kaminski A, Spiegelstein D, Avisar N, Kezurer I, Mazursky A, Handel R, Peleg Y, Avraham S, Ludomirsky A, Lang RM. Real-Time Artificial Intelligence-Based Guidance of Echocardiographic Imaging by Novices: Image Quality and Suitability for Diagnostic Interpretation and Quantitative Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Nov;16(11):e015569. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.015569. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
PMID: 37955139BACKGROUNDJozwiak M, Mercado P, Teboul JL, Benmalek A, Gimenez J, Depret F, Richard C, Monnet X. What is the lowest change in cardiac output that transthoracic echocardiography can detect? Crit Care. 2019 Apr 11;23(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2413-x.
PMID: 30971307BACKGROUNDLevy N, Meslin S, Barthelemy R, Benremily F, Bourgeois C, Bourzeix P, Chousterman B, Djadi-Prat J, Ep A, Kezar A, Laidet C, Lanoy E, Leopold V, Pereira H, Plateker O, Rivoalen AS, de Roquetaillade C, Vignon P, Bruno J, Cholley B. Reliability of minimally trained operator's left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral measurement guided by artificial intelligence: protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Oct 21;15(10):e105624. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105624.
PMID: 41125264DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bernard MD Cholley, PhD
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2024
First Posted
July 3, 2024
Study Start
November 14, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2026
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Two years after the last publication
- Access Criteria
- Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered. The founder could be involved in the decision. Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and IP team to present scientifics (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractualization. Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared