Study Brain Mechanisms of Frustration With Magnetoencephalography in Healthy Volunteers
Characterizing the Brain Circuitry and Neural Activity Mediating Frustration
2 other identifiers
interventional
90
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Background: Irritability can be defined as an unusually strong response to frustration; these responses may include severe temper outbursts and a constant grumpy mood. Irritability is a common symptom of many mental health disorders. Little is known about how the brain responds to frustration, and few treatments are available for this problem. Researchers want to know more about how the brain responds to frustration. Objective: To learn how the brain responds to frustration. Eligibility: Healthy adults aged 18 to 55 years. They must have been screened through studies 01-M-0254 or 17-M-0181. Design: Participants will have up to 3 study visits in 2 months. Each visit will last up to 4 hours. Visit 1: Participants will be screened. They will have a physical exam. They will complete questionnaires about how often and how easily they get angry or grumpy. They will be trained to use a device that measures hand grip. Visit 2: Participants will have a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. They will lie on a table that slides into a tube. Padding will hold their head still. Visit 3: Participants will undergo magnetoencephalography (MEG). A cone with detectors will be lowered over their head while they are seated. The MEG will measure the magnetic fields in the participant s brain both while they are resting and while they are doing the frustration task. For the task, they will hold a grip device in each hand. They will use the devices to pick 1 of 2 doors on a computer screen. The task has 3 parts. The participant s face will be filmed during this task.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Feb 2025
Typical duration for early_phase_1
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 3, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 21, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2027
April 29, 2026
April 16, 2026
2.5 years
June 29, 2024
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
(1) The power of neural oscillations in the cortical-basal ganglia-thalamic circuit; (2) Coherence of neural oscillations in this circuit; (3) Frustration rating by self-report, facial expression, and the duration and strength of gripping.
MEG recording is acquired during the frustration task. 3-6 minutes of resting-state recording is acquired before, between, and after each block of the frustration task. Feelings of frustration and unhappiness were assessed after each run using 9-point Likert scales. Frustration assessment takes place before and after the task and between each block within the task. The strength and duration of gripping the press device during the task is recorded for all trials.
The measurements will be taken during the MEG/frustration task session.
Study Arms (1)
Frustration task
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental manipulation for this study is the frustration task. The frustration task is designed to elicit the emotional state of frustrative non-reward (FNR). During the task, participants are asked to use button press (left or right) to alternately press one of the two doors displayed on the monitor. The task has two non-frustration blocks (Block 1 and 2) and one frustration block (Block 3). During the non-frustration blocks, participants earn money for correct press on a fixed schedule. During the frustrative block, participants will not always receive reward for correct press.
Interventions
The experimental manipulation for this study is the frustration task. The frustration task is designed to elicit the emotional state of frustrative non-reward (FNR). During the task, participants are asked to use button press (left or right) to alternately press one of the two doors displayed on the monitor. The task has two non-frustration blocks (Block 1 and 2) and one frustration block (Block 3). During the non-frustration blocks, participants earn money for correct press on a fixed schedule. During the frustrative block, participants will not always receive reward for correct press.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This study will include adult healthy volunteers.
- Age: 18-55
- Consent: can give consent
- Speak and read English
- The instruments have not been validated in other languages.
- At the NIH site, previously screened through other NIH protocols such as protocol 01-M-0254, 17-M-0181, and 93-M-0170 and determined eligible as healthy volunteers.
You may not qualify if:
- An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this
- study:
- Any serious medical condition
- History, physical exam, or laboratory testing including drug abuse screen.
- Prescription and over-the-counter medications and dietary supplements with psychoactive properties (e.g., St. John's Wort, Melatonin, Valerian)
- Any condition that interferes with MRI or MEG\*\*
- History
- Any current psychiatric diagnosis
- SCID-V, clinical assessment, or history.
- Pregnancy
- Pregnancy testing will be done before all MRIs.
- People who work on night shifts
- History
- Drug use
- Subjects with drug use or positive drug screen more than two years ago are eligible for participation.
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, United States
Texas A&M University
College Station, Texas, 77843, United States
Related Publications (38)
Beauchaine TP, Tackett JL. Irritability as a Transdiagnostic Vulnerability Trait:Current Issues and Future Directions. Behav Ther. 2020 Mar;51(2):350-364. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.10.009. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
PMID: 32138943BACKGROUNDBrotman MA, Kircanski K, Leibenluft E. Irritability in Children and Adolescents. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:317-341. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-044941.
PMID: 28482689BACKGROUNDEshel N, Leibenluft E. New Frontiers in Irritability Research-From Cradle to Grave and Bench to Bedside. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):227-228. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.3686. No abstract available.
PMID: 31799997BACKGROUNDLinke JO, Haller SP, Xu EP, Nguyen LT, Chue AE, Botz-Zapp C, Revzina O, Perlstein S, Ross AJ, Tseng WL, Shaw P, Brotman MA, Pine DS, Gotts SJ, Leibenluft E, Kircanski K. Persistent Frustration-Induced Reconfigurations of Brain Networks Predict Individual Differences in Irritability. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;62(6):684-695. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.11.009. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
PMID: 36563874BACKGROUNDTseng WL, Deveney CM, Stoddard J, Kircanski K, Frackman AE, Yi JY, Hsu D, Moroney E, Machlin L, Donahue L, Roule A, Perhamus G, Reynolds RC, Roberson-Nay R, Hettema JM, Towbin KE, Stringaris A, Pine DS, Brotman MA, Leibenluft E. Brain Mechanisms of Attention Orienting Following Frustration: Associations With Irritability and Age in Youths. Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;176(1):67-76. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040491. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
PMID: 30336704BACKGROUNDAMSEL A. The role of frustrative nonreward in noncontinuous reward situations. Psychol Bull. 1958 Mar;55(2):102-19. doi: 10.1037/h0043125. No abstract available.
PMID: 13527595BACKGROUNDNaik AA, Ma X, Munyeshyaka M, Leibenluft E, Li Z. A New Behavioral Paradigm for Frustrative Non-reward Reveals a Global Change in Brain Networks by Frustration. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Jun 6:2023.02.28.530477. doi: 10.1101/2023.02.28.530477.
PMID: 36909498BACKGROUNDNaik AA, Ma X, Munyeshyaka M, Leibenluft E, Li Z. A New Behavioral Paradigm for Frustrative Nonreward in Juvenile Mice. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023 Nov 17;4(1):31-38. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.09.007. eCollection 2024 Jan.
PMID: 38045768BACKGROUNDVrba J, Robinson SE. Signal processing in magnetoencephalography. Methods. 2001 Oct;25(2):249-71. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1238.
PMID: 11812209BACKGROUNDPizzo F, Roehri N, Medina Villalon S, Trebuchon A, Chen S, Lagarde S, Carron R, Gavaret M, Giusiano B, McGonigal A, Bartolomei F, Badier JM, Benar CG. Deep brain activities can be detected with magnetoencephalography. Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 27;10(1):971. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08665-5.
PMID: 30814498BACKGROUNDSalvadore G, Cornwell BR, Sambataro F, Latov D, Colon-Rosario V, Carver F, Holroyd T, DiazGranados N, Machado-Vieira R, Grillon C, Drevets WC, Zarate CA Jr. Anterior cingulate desynchronization and functional connectivity with the amygdala during a working memory task predict rapid antidepressant response to ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jun;35(7):1415-22. doi: 10.1038/npp.2010.24. Epub 2010 Mar 10.
PMID: 20393460BACKGROUNDCornwell BR, Carver FW, Coppola R, Johnson L, Alvarez R, Grillon C. Evoked amygdala responses to negative faces revealed by adaptive MEG beamformers. Brain Res. 2008 Dec 9;1244:103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.068. Epub 2008 Oct 7.
PMID: 18930036BACKGROUNDCarlson GA, Singh MK. Emotion Dysregulation and Outbursts in Children and Adolescents: Part I. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2021 Apr;30(2):xiii-xvi. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2020.10.014. Epub 2021 Feb 15. No abstract available.
PMID: 33743952BACKGROUNDSingh MK, Carlson GA. Emotion Dysregulation in Children and Adolescents: Part II. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2021 Jul;30(3):xiii-xiv. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2021.05.002. No abstract available.
PMID: 34053694BACKGROUNDTseng WL, Naim R, Chue A, Shaughnessy S, Meigs J, Pine DS, Leibenluft E, Kircanski K, Brotman MA. Network analysis of ecological momentary assessment identifies frustration as a central node in irritability. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;64(8):1212-1221. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13794. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
PMID: 36977629BACKGROUNDAbler B, Walter H, Erk S. Neural correlates of frustration. Neuroreport. 2005 May 12;16(7):669-72. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200505120-00003.
PMID: 15858403BACKGROUNDBierzynska M, Bielecki M, Marchewka A, Debowska W, Duszyk A, Zajkowski W, Falkiewicz M, Nowicka A, Strelau J, Kossut M. Effect of Frustration on Brain Activation Pattern in Subjects with Different Temperament. Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 11;6:1989. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01989. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26793136BACKGROUNDDeveney CM, Connolly ME, Haring CT, Bones BL, Reynolds RC, Kim P, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Neural mechanisms of frustration in chronically irritable children. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;170(10):1186-94. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070917.
PMID: 23732841BACKGROUNDGrabell AS, Li Y, Barker JW, Wakschlag LS, Huppert TJ, Perlman SB. Evidence of Non-Linear Associations between Frustration-Related Prefrontal Cortex Activation and the Normal:Abnormal Spectrum of Irritability in Young Children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 Jan;46(1):137-147. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0286-5.
PMID: 28315125BACKGROUNDPawliczek CM, Derntl B, Kellermann T, Gur RC, Schneider F, Habel U. Anger under control: neural correlates of frustration as a function of trait aggression. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e78503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078503. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24205247BACKGROUNDPerlman SB, Jones BM, Wakschlag LS, Axelson D, Birmaher B, Phillips ML. Neural substrates of child irritability in typically developing and psychiatric populations. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug;14:71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
PMID: 26218424BACKGROUNDRich BA, Holroyd T, Carver FW, Onelio LM, Mendoza JK, Cornwell BR, Fox NA, Pine DS, Coppola R, Leibenluft E. A preliminary study of the neural mechanisms of frustration in pediatric bipolar disorder using magnetoencephalography. Depress Anxiety. 2010 Mar;27(3):276-86. doi: 10.1002/da.20649.
PMID: 20037920BACKGROUNDYu R, Mobbs D, Seymour B, Rowe JB, Calder AJ. The neural signature of escalating frustration in humans. Cortex. 2014 May;54:165-78. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
PMID: 24699035BACKGROUNDAMSEL A, HANCOCK W. Motivational properties of frustration. III. Relation of frustration effect to antedating goal factors. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Feb;53(2):126-31. doi: 10.1037/h0042075. No abstract available.
PMID: 13406193BACKGROUNDBrotman MA, Kircanski K, Stringaris A, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Irritability in Youths: A Translational Model. Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 1;174(6):520-532. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16070839. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PMID: 28103715BACKGROUNDMorgan JI, Cohen DR, Hempstead JL, Curran T. Mapping patterns of c-fos expression in the central nervous system after seizure. Science. 1987 Jul 10;237(4811):192-7. doi: 10.1126/science.3037702.
PMID: 3037702BACKGROUNDSheng M, Greenberg ME. The regulation and function of c-fos and other immediate early genes in the nervous system. Neuron. 1990 Apr;4(4):477-85. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90106-p. No abstract available.
PMID: 1969743BACKGROUNDPost RJ, Bulkin DA, Ebitz RB, Lee V, Han K, Warden MR. Tonic activity in lateral habenula neurons acts as a neutral valence brake on reward-seeking behavior. Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 24;32(20):4325-4336.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Aug 31.
PMID: 36049479BACKGROUNDStarkweather CK, Uchida N. Dopamine signals as temporal difference errors: recent advances. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021 Apr;67:95-105. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PMID: 33186815BACKGROUNDHaber SN, Knutson B. The reward circuit: linking primate anatomy and human imaging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):4-26. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.129.
PMID: 19812543BACKGROUNDDugre JR, Potvin S. Neural bases of frustration-aggression theory: A multi-domain meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 15;331:64-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
PMID: 36924847BACKGROUNDScheinost D, Dadashkarimi J, Finn ES, Wambach CG, MacGillivray C, Roule AL, Niendam TA, Pine DS, Brotman MA, Leibenluft E, Tseng WL. Functional connectivity during frustration: a preliminary study of predictive modeling of irritability in youth. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jun;46(7):1300-1306. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00954-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
PMID: 33479511BACKGROUNDLeibenluft E, Allen LE, Althoff RR, Brotman MA, Burke JD, Carlson GA, Dickstein DP, Dougherty LR, Evans SC, Kircanski K, Klein DN, Malone EP, Mazefsky CA, Nigg J, Perlman SB, Pine DS, Roy AK, Salum GA, Shakeshaft A, Silver J, Stoddard J, Thapar A, Tseng WL, Vidal-Ribas P, Wakschlag LS, Stringaris A. Irritability in Youths: A Critical Integrative Review. Am J Psychiatry. 2024 Apr 1;181(4):275-290. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20230256. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
PMID: 38419494BACKGROUNDHaller SP, Kircanski K, Stringaris A, Clayton M, Bui H, Agorsor C, Cardenas SI, Towbin KE, Pine DS, Leibenluft E, Brotman MA. The Clinician Affective Reactivity Index: Validity and Reliability of a Clinician-Rated Assessment of Irritability. Behav Ther. 2020 Mar;51(2):283-293. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
PMID: 32138938BACKGROUNDStringaris A, Goodman R, Ferdinando S, Razdan V, Muhrer E, Leibenluft E, Brotman MA. The Affective Reactivity Index: a concise irritability scale for clinical and research settings. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;53(11):1109-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02561.x. Epub 2012 May 10.
PMID: 22574736BACKGROUNDHoltzman S, O'Connor BP, Barata PC, Stewart DE. The Brief Irritability Test (BITe): a measure of irritability for use among men and women. Assessment. 2015 Feb;22(1):101-15. doi: 10.1177/1073191114533814. Epub 2014 May 15.
PMID: 24830513BACKGROUNDStaddon JE, Cerutti DT. Operant conditioning. Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:115-44. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145124. Epub 2002 Jun 10.
PMID: 12415075BACKGROUNDVasquez TES, Shah P, Re JD, Laezza F, Green TA. Individual Differences in Frustrative Nonreward Behavior for Sucrose in Rats Predict Motivation for Fentanyl under Progressive Ratio. eNeuro. 2021 Oct 27;8(5):ENEURO.0136-21.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0136-21.2021. Print 2021 Sep-Oct.
PMID: 34607807BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zheng Li, Ph.D.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- NIH
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2024
First Posted
July 3, 2024
Study Start
February 21, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04-16
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- SAP
- Time Frame
- IPD that under results in a publication may be requested by other researchers when the publication is online or in print or by the end of the project/protocol, whichever comes first.
- Access Criteria
- IPD that under results in a publication will be made public through NIH-supported scientific data repositories. Access criteria are defined by the repositories and not limited by analysis type.
All IPD that underlies results in a publication will be made available upon requested by other researchers. If participants are co-enrolled in another NIH protocol, then data collected in either study may be shared with and used for research in either study.