NCT06478316

Brief Summary

Whether intracervical block with lidocaine 1% is superior to sham procedure - intracervical injection of saline 0.9% - in terms of pain control.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Jul 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress77%
Jul 2024Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 27, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

June 27, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

June 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 22, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain level using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale (100=worst pain)

    Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale

    During the procedure

  • Rate of patient reporting severe pain (VAS 75-100) during laminaria insertion

    Patients will be asked to rate their maximal pain level during the procedure of laminaria insertion using 0-100 Visual Analog Scale

    During the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • The rate of complications

    During and immediately after the procedure

  • Acceptability of the procedure measured as the rate of patients who will state that they found the procedure acceptable

    Immediately after the procedure

Study Arms (2)

Study

EXPERIMENTAL

a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 7 ml of lidocaine and 1 ml of bicarbonate (total 70 mg of lidocaine).

Procedure: Intracervical block

Control

SHAM COMPARATOR

a 10 ml syringe will be filled with 8 ml of 0.9% NaCl saline

Procedure: Intracervical block

Interventions

local injection of lidocain to the cervix

ControlStudy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Voluntary termination of pregnancy approved by a committee or missed abortion
  • to 22.5 gestational week (The gestational age in the case of a missed abortion is determined by the BPD - Biparietal Diameter, which is the determining measure for the ability to perform D\&E.)
  • Singleton pregnancy

You may not qualify if:

  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Women undergoing the procedure urgently due to cervical insufficiency, inevitable abortion, premature rupture of membranes, or suspected chorioamnionitis
  • Allergy to lidocaine
  • Women who do not speak Hebrew or English
  • Women who have a guardian for any reason
  • Women with a history of cesarean section
  • Women with abnormal placental implantation, such as placenta previa or suspected placenta accreta
  • Women with a psychiatric illness
  • Women with a history of alcoholism or drug abuse
  • Women who required a "two-stage" laminaria insertion will not be included in the analysis. In cases where the cervix does not allow the insertion of the required number of laminaria, the process is carried out in two stages: in the first stage, the maximum possible number is inserted, the woman is hospitalized, and after a few hours when some initial dilation of the cervix has occurred, the laminaria are removed and new ones are inserted according to the required number

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (9)

  • Fox MC, Hayes JL; Society of Family Planning. Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation. Contraception. 2007 Dec;76(6):486-95. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.09.004. Epub 2007 Nov 9.

  • Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates WJ Jr. Prevention of uterine perforation during curettage abortion. JAMA. 1984 Apr 27;251(16):2108-11.

  • Borgatta L, Roncari D, Sonalkar S, Mark A, Hou MY, Finneseth M, Vragovic O. Mifepristone vs. osmotic dilator insertion for cervical preparation prior to surgical abortion at 14-16 weeks: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2012 Nov;86(5):567-71. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Jun 6.

  • Prairie BA, Lauria MR, Kapp N, Mackenzie T, Baker ER, George KE. Mifepristone versus laminaria: a randomized controlled trial of cervical ripening in midtrimester termination. Contraception. 2007 Nov;76(5):383-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.07.008. Epub 2007 Oct 4.

  • Mercier RJ, Liberty A. Intrauterine lidocaine for pain control during laminaria insertion: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2014 Dec;90(6):594-600. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 23.

  • Shaw KA, Lerma K. Update on second-trimester surgical abortion. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;28(6):510-516. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000318.

  • Ramesh S, Roston A, Zimmerman L, Patel A, Lichtenberg ES, Chor J. Misoprostol 1 to 3 h preprocedure vs. overnight osmotic dilators prior to early second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2015 Sep;92(3):234-40. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.04.005. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

  • Lerma K, Blumenthal PD. Current and potential methods for second trimester abortion. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Feb;63:24-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 25.

  • Creinin MD, Schimmoeller NR, Matulich MC, Hou MY, Melo J, Chen MJ. Gabapentin for pain management after osmotic dilator insertion and prior to dilation and evacuation: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2020 Mar;101(3):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 10.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dilatation, Pathologic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Matan Mor, MD

    Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2024

First Posted

June 27, 2024

Study Start

July 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

June 27, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share