Effects of Home-based CIMT and Clinic-based CIM on Stroke
Effects of Repetition Home-based Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) Compared With Repetition Clinic-based CIMT on Outcomes Post Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Constraint induced movement therapy (CIMT) is based on the theoretical basis that constraining the unaffected limb following injury of the brain such as stroke can help overcome learned non-use. It comprises of constraint of the unaffected limb, massed tasks practice with the affected limb and a behavioral contract known as the transfer package whereby use of the affected limb is extended to the real-world situations. home-based rehabilitation is likely to be cost-effective, and it may reduce cost for patients in terms of hospital charges and transport fares. However, one of the major problems with the existing home-based CIMT protocols is that, they used number of hours spent carrying out tasks practice as the measure of intensity of practice, and it has been argued that, such method is not clear and it does not reflect the correct intensity of practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2024
CompletedJune 18, 2024
June 1, 2024
9 months
June 13, 2024
June 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (24)
upper limb Fugl Meyer motor assessment
valid and reliable instrument that assesses motor impairment following stroke. Items in the instrument are scored on a scale between 0 and 2, with a score 0 indicating cannot perform, a score of 1 indicating performs partially, and a score of 2 indicating performs fully. Scores obtained from the instrument can range from 0 to 66, with higher scores denoting higher ability.
at baseline
upper limb Fugl Meyer motor assessment
valid and reliable instrument that assesses motor impairment following stroke . Items in the instrument are scored on a scale between 0 and 2, with a score 0 indicating cannot perform, a score of 1 indicating performs partially, and a score of 2 indicating performs fully. Scores obtained from the instrument can range from 0 to 66, with higher scores denoting higher ability.
2 weeks
upper limb Fugl Meyer motor assessment
valid and reliable instrument that assesses motor impairment following stroke. Items in the instrument are scored on a scale between 0 and 2, with a score 0 indicating cannot perform, a score of 1 indicating performs partially, and a score of 2 indicating performs fully. Scores obtained from the instrument can range from 0 to 66, with higher scores denoting higher ability.
4 weeks
upper limb Fugl Meyer motor assessment
valid and reliable instrument that assesses motor impairment following stroke . Items in the instrument are scored on a scale between 0 and 2, with a score 0 indicating cannot perform, a score of 1 indicating performs partially, and a score of 2 indicating performs fully. Scores obtained from the instrument can range from 0 to 66, with higher scores denoting higher ability.
3 months follow up
Wolf motor function test (WMFT)
valid and reliable tool comprising of 17 items that assess motor function of the upper limb following stroke. Each of the items is rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher motor function. Similarly, the MAL is a valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
at baseline
Wolf motor function test (WMFT)
valid and reliable tool comprising of 17 items that assess motor function of the upper limb following stroke. Each of the items is rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher motor function. Similarly, the MAL is a valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
2 weeks
Wolf motor function test (WMFT)
valid and reliable tool comprising of 17 items that assess motor function of the upper limb following stroke. Each of the items is rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher motor function. Similarly, the MAL is a valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
4 weeks
Wolf motor function test (WMFT)
valid and reliable tool comprising of 17 items that assess motor function of the upper limb following stroke. Each of the items is rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher motor function. Similarly, the MAL is a valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
3 months follow up
motor activity log (MAL)
valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
At baseline
motor activity log (MAL)
valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
2 weeks
motor activity log (MAL)
valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
4 weeks
motor activity log (MAL)
valid and reliable instrument comprising of 30 items that separately assess quantity and quality of the use of upper extremity in real world following a stroke. Each of the items contained in the instrument are rated on a scale of zero to 5, with higher scores denoting higher quantity or quality of use of the limb in the real world.
3 months follow up
community integration measure (CIM)
valid and reliable 10-item measure of social interactions following a disease or illness. Each item is rated on a 5 point scale, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 50.
at baseline
community integration measure (CIM)
valid and reliable 10-item measure of social interactions following a disease or illness. Each item is rated on a 5 point scale, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 50.
2 weeks
community integration measure (CIM)
valid and reliable 10-item measure of social interactions following a disease or illness. Each item is rated on a 5 point scale, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 50.
4 weeks
community integration measure (CIM)
valid and reliable 10-item measure of social interactions following a disease or illness. Each item is rated on a 5 point scale, with possible scores ranging from 0 to 50.
3 months follow up
stroke self-efficacy questionnaire (SSEQ)
The SSEQ is a valid and reliable measure of how confident patients with stroke are in carrying out activities of daily living. The most recent version of the questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores denoting increasing confidence.
at baseline
stroke self-efficacy questionnaire (SSEQ)
The SSEQ is a valid and reliable measure of how confident patients with stroke are in carrying out activities of daily living. The most recent version of the questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores denoting increasing confidence.
2 weeks
stroke self-efficacy questionnaire (SSEQ)
The SSEQ is a valid and reliable measure of how confident patients with stroke are in carrying out activities of daily living. The most recent version of the questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores denoting increasing confidence.
4 weeks
stroke self-efficacy questionnaire (SSEQ)
The SSEQ is a valid and reliable measure of how confident patients with stroke are in carrying out activities of daily living. The most recent version of the questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores denoting increasing confidence.
3 months follow up
stroke specific quality of life (SSQoL)
valid and reliable measure of quality of life specifically for patients with stroke. It consists of 49 items measuring 12 domains.
at baseline
stroke specific quality of life (SSQoL)
valid and reliable measure of quality of life specifically for patients with stroke. It consists of 49 items measuring 12 domains.
2 weeks
stroke specific quality of life (SSQoL)
valid and reliable measure of quality of life specifically for patients with stroke. It consists of 49 items measuring 12 domains.
4 weeks
stroke specific quality of life (SSQoL)
valid and reliable measure of quality of life specifically for patients with stroke. It consists of 49 items measuring 12 domains.
3 months follow up
Study Arms (3)
Home-based CIMT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants and their families will be required to attend clinic to practice 3 times (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) during the first week, 2 times (Monday and Friday) during the second week and once (Monday) during the 3rd week under the supervision of a trained research assistant. They will be allowed to practice exclusively at home during the 4th week under the supervision of their family members.
Clinic-based CIMT
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in both groups will perform 5 tasks with the affected upper limb, each 100 times, making it 500 repetitions in total within a duration of 2 hours every day, five days a week for 4 weeks at home and in the clinic respectively. Details of the tasks to be performed are presented in table 1. We chose 2 hours because, patients with stroke can perform about 300 repetitions of tasks practice within one hour (Birkinmeier et al., 2014). Similarly, we chose 500 repetitions because the number of repetitions of tasks practice required for motor recovery ranges between 300 and 600 repetitions per day
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will attend 45 minutes health talk provided by a research assistant twice in a week (Mondays and Fridays) in the clinic for 4 weeks. They will receive each talk in either a group of 3 or 5 patients. Similar control intervention was used in previous study
Interventions
Participants and their families will be required to attend clinic to practice 3 times (Monday, Wednesday and Friday) during the first week, 2 times (Monday and Friday) during the second week and once (Monday) during the 3rd week under the supervision of a trained research assistant. They will be allowed to practice exclusively at home during the 4th week under the supervision of their family members.
Participants in both groups will perform 5 tasks with the affected upper limb, each 100 times, making it 500 repetitions in total within a duration of 2 hours every day, five days a week for 4 weeks at home and in the clinic respectively. Details of the tasks to be performed are presented in table 1. We chose 2 hours because, patients with stroke can perform about 300 repetitions of tasks practice within one hour. Similarly, we chose 500 repetitions because the number of repetitions of tasks practice required for motor recovery ranges between 300 and 600 repetitions per day
Participants will attend 45 minutes health talk provided by a research assistant twice in a week (Mondays and Fridays) in the clinic for 4 weeks. They will receive each talk in either a group of 3 or 5 patients. Similar control intervention was used in previous study
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- have stroke 1-2 years before
- moderate disability
- a score of 1 to 3 on the motor arm item of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
- a score of 3 or more on the upper arm item of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS)
- no significant cognitive impairment (a score of ≥24 points on Minimental state examination)
You may not qualify if:
- patients with re-stroke
- serious orthopaedic conditions such joint contracture, osteoarthritis and burns that will interfere with carrying out CIMT
- who are receiving rehabilitation at the time of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shamay Ng, PhD
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 13, 2024
First Posted
June 18, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2024
Last Updated
June 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06