NCT06463418

Brief Summary

The goal of this feasibility trial is to learn if exoskeleton or robotic walking works to reduce nerve (neuropathic) pain after spinal cord injury. This study asks is:

  • Providing walking practice through use of a robotic device (exoskeleton) three times per week for twelve weeks possible to deliver?
  • Would people sign up and stick to the programme?
  • And will it help to reduce neuropathic pain levels after spinal injury? Researchers will compare robotic walking and a relaxation program to see if robotic walking works to reduce neuropathic pain levels after spinal injury. Participants will:
  • Complete a number of questionnaires and tests related to their pain before the trial.
  • Complete robotic walking or a relaxation program three times per week for twelve weeks.
  • Complete the same questionnaires and tests after the trial finishes and 6 months after.
  • Complete an interview telling researchers about their experiences of the trial.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Dec 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress71%
Dec 2024Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 22, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Spinal Cord InjuriesRoboticsPainNeurorehabilitationAdultNeuropathic Pain

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set Version 3.0 (ISCIPBDS 3.0) (Pain intensity)

    This outcome measure will be used to capture average neuropathic pain intensity in participants

    This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.

  • International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set Version 3.0 (ISCIPBDS 3.0) (Pain interference)

    This outcome measure will be used to capture average neuropathic pain interference in participants. Pain interference entails interference with sleep, daily activities and overall mood.

    This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)

    This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.

  • Electroencephelography (EEG)

    This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.

Study Arms (2)

Exoskeleton (Intervention)

EXPERIMENTAL

Exoskeleton walking delivered three times per week for twelve weeks. Each session will be one hour duration.

Device: Ekoskeleton (Intervention)

Relaxation (Comparator)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

An equally dosed blended relaxation program delivered online for two sessions per week and in-person one session per week.

Other: Relaxation (Comparator)

Interventions

Exoskeleton walking three times per week for 12 weeks.

Also known as: Ekso NR
Exoskeleton (Intervention)

Relaxation three times per week for 12 weeks.

Relaxation (Comparator)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals who are 18 years and over.
  • Confirmed traumatic SCI (injury resulted from an external physical impact and not an acute or chronic disease process) of \>6 months duration with complete or incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia.
  • Individuals with above confirmed traumatic SCI who have below-level NP (≥ 3 levels below neurological level and/or extending to at-level region) starting after the SCI and persisting for \> 3 continuous months, despite pharmacotherapy.
  • NP will be confirmed based on a neurological examination, a score of ≥4 on the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) (48) and a comprehensive pain history supported by the use of the ISCIP Pain Classification. They endorse one or more of the following pain descriptors to assist in confirmation of below level NP "'hot-burning', 'tingling', 'pricking', 'pins and needles', 'sharp', 'shooting', 'squeezing', 'painful cold' and 'electric shock-like'" (45).
  • Moderate and severe NP as confirmed above will be described as pain ≥ 3 and ≥ 6 on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for NP (averaged over a week).
  • Exoskeleton naive
  • Stable medication regimen
  • Have the capacity to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Non-traumatic SCI, cauda equina lesions or Guillain Barré diagnoses
  • NP intensities of \<3 (NRS) or nociceptive pain profiles only based on the ISCIP pain classification convention.
  • Recent lower limb fracture
  • Inadequate bone density (z score \< -2)
  • Anthropometric measurements incompatible with the exoskeleton device (i.e. height \>1.9m, weight \>100kgs, significant lower limb spasticity)
  • Unstable comorbid medical condition/psychiatric condition/medication regimen
  • Planned surgery coinciding with intervention
  • Pregnancy
  • Drug and alcohol abuse

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University College Dublin

Dublin, Ireland

Location

Related Publications (43)

  • Burke D, Fullen BM, Stokes D, Lennon O. Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2017 Jan;21(1):29-44. doi: 10.1002/ejp.905. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

    PMID: 27341614BACKGROUND
  • Finnerup NB, Norrbrink C, Trok K, Piehl F, Johannesen IL, Sorensen JC, Jensen TS, Werhagen L. Phenotypes and predictors of pain following traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective study. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 1.

    PMID: 24268112BACKGROUND
  • Burke D, Lennon O, Fullen BM. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: The impact of pain. Eur J Pain. 2018 Oct;22(9):1662-1672. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1248. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

    PMID: 29770520BACKGROUND
  • Burke D, Fullen BM, Lennon O. Pain profiles in a community dwelling population following spinal cord injury: a national survey. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Mar;42(2):201-211. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1351051. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

    PMID: 28738744BACKGROUND
  • Hearn JH, Cotter I, Fine P, A Finlay K. Living with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of community experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2203-11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.1002579. Epub 2015 Jan 20.

    PMID: 25601144BACKGROUND
  • Kennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord. 2006 Feb;44(2):95-105. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101787.

    PMID: 16130026BACKGROUND
  • Siddall PJ. Management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: now and in the future. Spinal Cord. 2009 May;47(5):352-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.136. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

    PMID: 19002150BACKGROUND
  • Mann R, Schaefer C, Sadosky A, Bergstrom F, Baik R, Parsons B, Nalamachu S, Stacey BR, Tuchman M, Anschel A, Nieshoff EC. Burden of spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain in the United States: retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jul;51(7):564-70. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.34. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

    PMID: 23588572BACKGROUND
  • Widerstrom-Noga EG, Felipe-Cuervo E, Yezierski RP. Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1191-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25077.

    PMID: 11552190BACKGROUND
  • Finnerup NB, Grydehoj J, Bing J, Johannesen IL, Biering-Sorensen F, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Levetiracetam in spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2009 Dec;47(12):861-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.55. Epub 2009 Jun 9.

    PMID: 19506571BACKGROUND
  • Widerstrom-Noga E, Felix ER, Adcock JP, Escalona M, Tibbett J. Multidimensional Neuropathic Pain Phenotypes after Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Mar 1;33(5):482-92. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4040. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

    PMID: 26414803BACKGROUND
  • Foell J, Andoh J, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Diers M, Fuchs X, Colloca L, Flor H. Peripheral origin of phantom limb pain: is it all resolved? Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):2205-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25180014BACKGROUND
  • Flor H. Maladaptive plasticity, memory for pain and phantom limb pain: review and suggestions for new therapies. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):809-18. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.809.

    PMID: 18457537BACKGROUND
  • Wrigley PJ, Press SR, Gustin SM, Macefield VG, Gandevia SC, Cousins MJ, Middleton JW, Henderson LA, Siddall PJ. Neuropathic pain and primary somatosensory cortex reorganization following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2009 Jan;141(1-2):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Nov 21.

    PMID: 19027233BACKGROUND
  • Sarnthein J, Jeanmonod D. High thalamocortical theta coherence in patients with neurogenic pain. Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1910-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.019. Epub 2007 Oct 25.

    PMID: 18060808BACKGROUND
  • Vuckovic A, Jajrees M, Purcell M, Berry H, Fraser M. Electroencephalographic Predictors of Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury. J Pain. 2018 Nov;19(11):1256.e1-1256.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 8.

    PMID: 29751110BACKGROUND
  • Boord P, Siddall PJ, Tran Y, Herbert D, Middleton J, Craig A. Electroencephalographic slowing and reduced reactivity in neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008 Feb;46(2):118-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102077. Epub 2007 May 15.

    PMID: 17502876BACKGROUND
  • Jensen MP, Sherlin LH, Gertz KJ, Braden AL, Kupper AE, Gianas A, Howe JD, Hakimian S. Brain EEG activity correlates of chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury: clinical implications. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jan;51(1):55-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.84. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

    PMID: 22801188BACKGROUND
  • Vuckovic A, Hasan MA, Fraser M, Conway BA, Nasseroleslami B, Allan DB. Dynamic oscillatory signatures of central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):645-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 1.

    PMID: 24589821BACKGROUND
  • Vuckovic A, Gallardo VJF, Jarjees M, Fraser M, Purcell M. Prediction of central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury based on EEG classifier. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug;129(8):1605-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.750. Epub 2018 May 23.

    PMID: 29886266BACKGROUND
  • Mussigmann T, Bardel B, Lefaucheur JP. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) biomarkers of chronic neuropathic pain. A systematic review. Neuroimage. 2022 Sep;258:119351. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119351. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

    PMID: 35659993BACKGROUND
  • Loh E, Mirkowski M, Agudelo AR, Allison DJ, Benton B, Bryce TN, Guilcher S, Jeji T, Kras-Dupuis A, Kreutzwiser D, Lanizi O, Lee-Tai-Fuy G, Middleton JW, Moulin DE, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Townson A, Widerstrom-Noga E, Wolfe DL, Xia N, Mehta S. The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update. Spinal Cord. 2022 Jun;60(6):548-566. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00744-z. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

    PMID: 35124700BACKGROUND
  • Guy SD, Mehta S, Casalino A, Cote I, Kras-Dupuis A, Moulin DE, Parrent AG, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Bradbury CL, Bryce TN, Craven BC, Finnerup NB, Harvey D, Hitzig SL, Lau B, Middleton JW, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Siddall PJ, Townson A, Truchon C, Widerstrom-Noga E, Wolfe D, Loh E. The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: Recommendations for treatment. Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54 Suppl 1:S14-23. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.90.

    PMID: 27444715BACKGROUND
  • Jensen MP, Dworkin RH, Gammaitoni AR, Olaleye DO, Oleka N, Galer BS. Assessment of pain quality in chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain clinical trials with the Neuropathic Pain Scale. J Pain. 2005 Feb;6(2):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.002.

    PMID: 15694876BACKGROUND
  • Cardenas DD, Jensen MP. Treatments for chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury: A survey study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(2):109-17. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753864.

    PMID: 16739554BACKGROUND
  • Siddall PJ, Cousins MJ, Otte A, Griesing T, Chambers R, Murphy TK. Pregabalin in central neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury: a placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Nov 28;67(10):1792-800. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244422.45278.ff.

    PMID: 17130411BACKGROUND
  • Widerstrom-Noga E, Anderson KD, Perez S, Martinez-Arizala A, Calle-Coule L, Fleming L. Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Neuropathic Pain Management: SCI Consumer, Significant Other, and Health Care Provider Perspectives. Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):2913-2924. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa058.

    PMID: 32219441BACKGROUND
  • Lofgren M, Norrbrink C. "But I know what works"--patients' experience of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain management. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(25):2139-47. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.676146. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

    PMID: 22512334BACKGROUND
  • Austin PD, Siddall PJ. Virtual reality for the treatment of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injuries: A scoping review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 Jan;44(1):8-18. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1575554. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

    PMID: 30707649BACKGROUND
  • Gustin SM, Bolding M, Willoughby W, Anam M, Shum C, Rumble D, Mark VW, Mitchell L, Cowan RE, Richardson E, Richards S, Trost Z. Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Immersive Interactive Virtual Walking Treatment for Amelioration of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury: Findings from a Preliminary Investigation of Thalamic Inhibitory Function. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5743. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175743.

    PMID: 37685810BACKGROUND
  • Trost Z, Anam M, Seward J, Shum C, Rumble D, Sturgeon J, Mark V, Chen Y, Mitchell L, Cowan R, Perera R, Richardson E, Richards S, Gustin S. Immersive interactive virtual walking reduces neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: findings from a preliminary investigation of feasibility and clinical efficacy. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):350-361. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002348.

    PMID: 34407034BACKGROUND
  • Eick J, Richardson EJ. Cortical activation during visual illusory walking in persons with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):750-3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 15.

    PMID: 25461820BACKGROUND
  • Moseley LG. Using visual illusion to reduce at-level neuropathic pain in paraplegia. Pain. 2007 Aug;130(3):294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Mar 1.

    PMID: 17335974BACKGROUND
  • Nees TA, Finnerup NB, Blesch A, Weidner N. Neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: the impact of sensorimotor activity. Pain. 2017 Mar;158(3):371-376. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000783. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27941498BACKGROUND
  • Dugan EA, Sagen J. An Intensive Locomotor Training Paradigm Improves Neuropathic Pain following Spinal Cord Compression Injury in Rats. J Neurotrauma. 2015 May 1;32(9):622-32. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3692. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

    PMID: 25539034BACKGROUND
  • Dugan EA, Schachner B, Jergova S, Sagen J. Intensive Locomotor Training Provides Sustained Alleviation of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury-Associated Neuropathic Pain: A Two-Year Pre-Clinical Study. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Mar 15;38(6):789-802. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7378. Epub 2021 Jan 21.

    PMID: 33218293BACKGROUND
  • Hutchinson KJ, Gomez-Pinilla F, Crowe MJ, Ying Z, Basso DM. Three exercise paradigms differentially improve sensory recovery after spinal cord contusion in rats. Brain. 2004 Jun;127(Pt 6):1403-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh160. Epub 2004 Apr 6.

    PMID: 15069022BACKGROUND
  • Bryce TN, Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Dijkers MP, Fann JR, Brooks L, Chiodo A, Tate DG, Forchheimer M. Screening for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury with the spinal cord injury pain instrument (SCIPI): a preliminary validation study. Spinal Cord. 2014 May;52(5):407-12. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.21. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

    PMID: 24614856BACKGROUND
  • Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.

    PMID: 15733628BACKGROUND
  • Bryce TN, Biering-Sorensen F, Finnerup NB, Cardenas DD, Defrin R, Lundeberg T, Norrbrink C, Richards JS, Siddall P, Stripling T, Treede RD, Waxman SG, Widerstrom-Noga E, Yezierski RP, Dijkers M. International spinal cord injury pain classification: part I. Background and description. March 6-7, 2009. Spinal Cord. 2012 Jun;50(6):413-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.156. Epub 2011 Dec 20.

    PMID: 22182852BACKGROUND
  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RH, Singmann H, Dai B, Grothendieck G, Green P, Bolker MB. Package 'lme4'. convergence. 2015 Oct 6;12(1):2.

    BACKGROUND
  • IBM Corp. Released 2023. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0.2.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp

    BACKGROUND
  • White C, Doherty O, Smith E, Blake C, Finnerup NB, Kirwan N, Pollock M, Lennon O. Exoskeleton Training for Spinal Cord Injury Neuropathic Pain (ExSCIP): Protocol for a Phase 2 Feasibility Randomised Trial. HRB Open Res. 2024 Sep 2;7:55. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1. eCollection 2024.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord InjuriesPainNeuralgia

Interventions

Methods

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal Cord DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Investigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Olive Lennon, PhD

    University College Dublin

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2024

First Posted

June 17, 2024

Study Start

December 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

1 year after the end of the project the master data sheet will be destroyed and anonymised files will be deposited in a secure data repository (Zenodo) with a permanent identifier (DOI) and available to the wider research community under a CC0 license. Participants will have an opportunity to consent or not to anonymised data archiving. In line with HRB Open Research Policy, repositories hosting the data will be cited in research papers.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
1 year after the end of the project. Anonymised data will be available indefinitely on Zenodo with a DOI under a CC0 license.
Access Criteria
Researchers who are affiliated with a university or research centre. They must provide a rationale for how the study data are relevant to a related study question around spinal cord injury pain. They must have documented training in research integrity. Requests will be reviewed by the study PI and study steering committee prior to granting access.
More information

Locations