Exoskeleton Training for Spinal Cord Injury Neuropathic Pain (ExSCIP)
ExSCIP
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this feasibility trial is to learn if exoskeleton or robotic walking works to reduce nerve (neuropathic) pain after spinal cord injury. This study asks is:
- Providing walking practice through use of a robotic device (exoskeleton) three times per week for twelve weeks possible to deliver?
- Would people sign up and stick to the programme?
- And will it help to reduce neuropathic pain levels after spinal injury? Researchers will compare robotic walking and a relaxation program to see if robotic walking works to reduce neuropathic pain levels after spinal injury. Participants will:
- Complete a number of questionnaires and tests related to their pain before the trial.
- Complete robotic walking or a relaxation program three times per week for twelve weeks.
- Complete the same questionnaires and tests after the trial finishes and 6 months after.
- Complete an interview telling researchers about their experiences of the trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2026
May 1, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.5 years
May 22, 2024
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set Version 3.0 (ISCIPBDS 3.0) (Pain intensity)
This outcome measure will be used to capture average neuropathic pain intensity in participants
This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.
International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set Version 3.0 (ISCIPBDS 3.0) (Pain interference)
This outcome measure will be used to capture average neuropathic pain interference in participants. Pain interference entails interference with sleep, daily activities and overall mood.
This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI)
This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.
Electroencephelography (EEG)
This will be measured at baseline, week 13 and at 6-month follow-up.
Study Arms (2)
Exoskeleton (Intervention)
EXPERIMENTALExoskeleton walking delivered three times per week for twelve weeks. Each session will be one hour duration.
Relaxation (Comparator)
ACTIVE COMPARATORAn equally dosed blended relaxation program delivered online for two sessions per week and in-person one session per week.
Interventions
Exoskeleton walking three times per week for 12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals who are 18 years and over.
- Confirmed traumatic SCI (injury resulted from an external physical impact and not an acute or chronic disease process) of \>6 months duration with complete or incomplete paraplegia or tetraplegia.
- Individuals with above confirmed traumatic SCI who have below-level NP (≥ 3 levels below neurological level and/or extending to at-level region) starting after the SCI and persisting for \> 3 continuous months, despite pharmacotherapy.
- NP will be confirmed based on a neurological examination, a score of ≥4 on the Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) (48) and a comprehensive pain history supported by the use of the ISCIP Pain Classification. They endorse one or more of the following pain descriptors to assist in confirmation of below level NP "'hot-burning', 'tingling', 'pricking', 'pins and needles', 'sharp', 'shooting', 'squeezing', 'painful cold' and 'electric shock-like'" (45).
- Moderate and severe NP as confirmed above will be described as pain ≥ 3 and ≥ 6 on the 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for NP (averaged over a week).
- Exoskeleton naive
- Stable medication regimen
- Have the capacity to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Non-traumatic SCI, cauda equina lesions or Guillain Barré diagnoses
- NP intensities of \<3 (NRS) or nociceptive pain profiles only based on the ISCIP pain classification convention.
- Recent lower limb fracture
- Inadequate bone density (z score \< -2)
- Anthropometric measurements incompatible with the exoskeleton device (i.e. height \>1.9m, weight \>100kgs, significant lower limb spasticity)
- Unstable comorbid medical condition/psychiatric condition/medication regimen
- Planned surgery coinciding with intervention
- Pregnancy
- Drug and alcohol abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University College Dublinlead
- Royal College of Surgeons, Irelandcollaborator
- University of Aarhuscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University College Dublin
Dublin, Ireland
Related Publications (43)
Burke D, Fullen BM, Stokes D, Lennon O. Neuropathic pain prevalence following spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2017 Jan;21(1):29-44. doi: 10.1002/ejp.905. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
PMID: 27341614BACKGROUNDFinnerup NB, Norrbrink C, Trok K, Piehl F, Johannesen IL, Sorensen JC, Jensen TS, Werhagen L. Phenotypes and predictors of pain following traumatic spinal cord injury: a prospective study. J Pain. 2014 Jan;15(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
PMID: 24268112BACKGROUNDBurke D, Lennon O, Fullen BM. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: The impact of pain. Eur J Pain. 2018 Oct;22(9):1662-1672. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1248. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
PMID: 29770520BACKGROUNDBurke D, Fullen BM, Lennon O. Pain profiles in a community dwelling population following spinal cord injury: a national survey. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Mar;42(2):201-211. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1351051. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
PMID: 28738744BACKGROUNDHearn JH, Cotter I, Fine P, A Finlay K. Living with chronic neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of community experience. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(23):2203-11. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.1002579. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
PMID: 25601144BACKGROUNDKennedy P, Lude P, Taylor N. Quality of life, social participation, appraisals and coping post spinal cord injury: a review of four community samples. Spinal Cord. 2006 Feb;44(2):95-105. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101787.
PMID: 16130026BACKGROUNDSiddall PJ. Management of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury: now and in the future. Spinal Cord. 2009 May;47(5):352-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.136. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
PMID: 19002150BACKGROUNDMann R, Schaefer C, Sadosky A, Bergstrom F, Baik R, Parsons B, Nalamachu S, Stacey BR, Tuchman M, Anschel A, Nieshoff EC. Burden of spinal cord injury-related neuropathic pain in the United States: retrospective chart review and cross-sectional survey. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jul;51(7):564-70. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.34. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
PMID: 23588572BACKGROUNDWiderstrom-Noga EG, Felipe-Cuervo E, Yezierski RP. Relationships among clinical characteristics of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Sep;82(9):1191-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.25077.
PMID: 11552190BACKGROUNDFinnerup NB, Grydehoj J, Bing J, Johannesen IL, Biering-Sorensen F, Sindrup SH, Jensen TS. Levetiracetam in spinal cord injury pain: a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2009 Dec;47(12):861-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.55. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
PMID: 19506571BACKGROUNDWiderstrom-Noga E, Felix ER, Adcock JP, Escalona M, Tibbett J. Multidimensional Neuropathic Pain Phenotypes after Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016 Mar 1;33(5):482-92. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4040. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
PMID: 26414803BACKGROUNDFoell J, Andoh J, Bekrater-Bodmann R, Diers M, Fuchs X, Colloca L, Flor H. Peripheral origin of phantom limb pain: is it all resolved? Pain. 2014 Oct;155(10):2205-2206. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PMID: 25180014BACKGROUNDFlor H. Maladaptive plasticity, memory for pain and phantom limb pain: review and suggestions for new therapies. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 May;8(5):809-18. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.5.809.
PMID: 18457537BACKGROUNDWrigley PJ, Press SR, Gustin SM, Macefield VG, Gandevia SC, Cousins MJ, Middleton JW, Henderson LA, Siddall PJ. Neuropathic pain and primary somatosensory cortex reorganization following spinal cord injury. Pain. 2009 Jan;141(1-2):52-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.10.007. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
PMID: 19027233BACKGROUNDSarnthein J, Jeanmonod D. High thalamocortical theta coherence in patients with neurogenic pain. Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 15;39(4):1910-7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.019. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
PMID: 18060808BACKGROUNDVuckovic A, Jajrees M, Purcell M, Berry H, Fraser M. Electroencephalographic Predictors of Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury. J Pain. 2018 Nov;19(11):1256.e1-1256.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 May 8.
PMID: 29751110BACKGROUNDBoord P, Siddall PJ, Tran Y, Herbert D, Middleton J, Craig A. Electroencephalographic slowing and reduced reactivity in neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008 Feb;46(2):118-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102077. Epub 2007 May 15.
PMID: 17502876BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Sherlin LH, Gertz KJ, Braden AL, Kupper AE, Gianas A, Howe JD, Hakimian S. Brain EEG activity correlates of chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury: clinical implications. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jan;51(1):55-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.84. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
PMID: 22801188BACKGROUNDVuckovic A, Hasan MA, Fraser M, Conway BA, Nasseroleslami B, Allan DB. Dynamic oscillatory signatures of central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury. J Pain. 2014 Jun;15(6):645-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 1.
PMID: 24589821BACKGROUNDVuckovic A, Gallardo VJF, Jarjees M, Fraser M, Purcell M. Prediction of central neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury based on EEG classifier. Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Aug;129(8):1605-1617. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.04.750. Epub 2018 May 23.
PMID: 29886266BACKGROUNDMussigmann T, Bardel B, Lefaucheur JP. Resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) biomarkers of chronic neuropathic pain. A systematic review. Neuroimage. 2022 Sep;258:119351. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119351. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
PMID: 35659993BACKGROUNDLoh E, Mirkowski M, Agudelo AR, Allison DJ, Benton B, Bryce TN, Guilcher S, Jeji T, Kras-Dupuis A, Kreutzwiser D, Lanizi O, Lee-Tai-Fuy G, Middleton JW, Moulin DE, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Townson A, Widerstrom-Noga E, Wolfe DL, Xia N, Mehta S. The CanPain SCI clinical practice guidelines for rehabilitation management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: 2021 update. Spinal Cord. 2022 Jun;60(6):548-566. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00744-z. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
PMID: 35124700BACKGROUNDGuy SD, Mehta S, Casalino A, Cote I, Kras-Dupuis A, Moulin DE, Parrent AG, Potter P, Short C, Teasell R, Bradbury CL, Bryce TN, Craven BC, Finnerup NB, Harvey D, Hitzig SL, Lau B, Middleton JW, O'Connell C, Orenczuk S, Siddall PJ, Townson A, Truchon C, Widerstrom-Noga E, Wolfe D, Loh E. The CanPain SCI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation Management of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord: Recommendations for treatment. Spinal Cord. 2016 Aug;54 Suppl 1:S14-23. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.90.
PMID: 27444715BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Dworkin RH, Gammaitoni AR, Olaleye DO, Oleka N, Galer BS. Assessment of pain quality in chronic neuropathic and nociceptive pain clinical trials with the Neuropathic Pain Scale. J Pain. 2005 Feb;6(2):98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.11.002.
PMID: 15694876BACKGROUNDCardenas DD, Jensen MP. Treatments for chronic pain in persons with spinal cord injury: A survey study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(2):109-17. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753864.
PMID: 16739554BACKGROUNDSiddall PJ, Cousins MJ, Otte A, Griesing T, Chambers R, Murphy TK. Pregabalin in central neuropathic pain associated with spinal cord injury: a placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2006 Nov 28;67(10):1792-800. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000244422.45278.ff.
PMID: 17130411BACKGROUNDWiderstrom-Noga E, Anderson KD, Perez S, Martinez-Arizala A, Calle-Coule L, Fleming L. Barriers and Facilitators to Optimal Neuropathic Pain Management: SCI Consumer, Significant Other, and Health Care Provider Perspectives. Pain Med. 2020 Nov 1;21(11):2913-2924. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa058.
PMID: 32219441BACKGROUNDLofgren M, Norrbrink C. "But I know what works"--patients' experience of spinal cord injury neuropathic pain management. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(25):2139-47. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.676146. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
PMID: 22512334BACKGROUNDAustin PD, Siddall PJ. Virtual reality for the treatment of neuropathic pain in people with spinal cord injuries: A scoping review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 Jan;44(1):8-18. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1575554. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
PMID: 30707649BACKGROUNDGustin SM, Bolding M, Willoughby W, Anam M, Shum C, Rumble D, Mark VW, Mitchell L, Cowan RE, Richardson E, Richards S, Trost Z. Cortical Mechanisms Underlying Immersive Interactive Virtual Walking Treatment for Amelioration of Neuropathic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury: Findings from a Preliminary Investigation of Thalamic Inhibitory Function. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 4;12(17):5743. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175743.
PMID: 37685810BACKGROUNDTrost Z, Anam M, Seward J, Shum C, Rumble D, Sturgeon J, Mark V, Chen Y, Mitchell L, Cowan R, Perera R, Richardson E, Richards S, Gustin S. Immersive interactive virtual walking reduces neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury: findings from a preliminary investigation of feasibility and clinical efficacy. Pain. 2022 Feb 1;163(2):350-361. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002348.
PMID: 34407034BACKGROUNDEick J, Richardson EJ. Cortical activation during visual illusory walking in persons with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4):750-3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
PMID: 25461820BACKGROUNDMoseley LG. Using visual illusion to reduce at-level neuropathic pain in paraplegia. Pain. 2007 Aug;130(3):294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.01.007. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
PMID: 17335974BACKGROUNDNees TA, Finnerup NB, Blesch A, Weidner N. Neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: the impact of sensorimotor activity. Pain. 2017 Mar;158(3):371-376. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000783. No abstract available.
PMID: 27941498BACKGROUNDDugan EA, Sagen J. An Intensive Locomotor Training Paradigm Improves Neuropathic Pain following Spinal Cord Compression Injury in Rats. J Neurotrauma. 2015 May 1;32(9):622-32. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3692. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
PMID: 25539034BACKGROUNDDugan EA, Schachner B, Jergova S, Sagen J. Intensive Locomotor Training Provides Sustained Alleviation of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury-Associated Neuropathic Pain: A Two-Year Pre-Clinical Study. J Neurotrauma. 2021 Mar 15;38(6):789-802. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7378. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
PMID: 33218293BACKGROUNDHutchinson KJ, Gomez-Pinilla F, Crowe MJ, Ying Z, Basso DM. Three exercise paradigms differentially improve sensory recovery after spinal cord contusion in rats. Brain. 2004 Jun;127(Pt 6):1403-14. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh160. Epub 2004 Apr 6.
PMID: 15069022BACKGROUNDBryce TN, Richards JS, Bombardier CH, Dijkers MP, Fann JR, Brooks L, Chiodo A, Tate DG, Forchheimer M. Screening for neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury with the spinal cord injury pain instrument (SCIPI): a preliminary validation study. Spinal Cord. 2014 May;52(5):407-12. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.21. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
PMID: 24614856BACKGROUNDBouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lanteri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous or somatic lesions and development of a new neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire (DN4). Pain. 2005 Mar;114(1-2):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.010. Epub 2005 Jan 26.
PMID: 15733628BACKGROUNDBryce TN, Biering-Sorensen F, Finnerup NB, Cardenas DD, Defrin R, Lundeberg T, Norrbrink C, Richards JS, Siddall P, Stripling T, Treede RD, Waxman SG, Widerstrom-Noga E, Yezierski RP, Dijkers M. International spinal cord injury pain classification: part I. Background and description. March 6-7, 2009. Spinal Cord. 2012 Jun;50(6):413-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.156. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
PMID: 22182852BACKGROUNDBates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Christensen RH, Singmann H, Dai B, Grothendieck G, Green P, Bolker MB. Package 'lme4'. convergence. 2015 Oct 6;12(1):2.
BACKGROUNDIBM Corp. Released 2023. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0.2.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
BACKGROUNDWhite C, Doherty O, Smith E, Blake C, Finnerup NB, Kirwan N, Pollock M, Lennon O. Exoskeleton Training for Spinal Cord Injury Neuropathic Pain (ExSCIP): Protocol for a Phase 2 Feasibility Randomised Trial. HRB Open Res. 2024 Sep 2;7:55. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13949.1. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 39840276DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olive Lennon, PhD
University College Dublin
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2024
First Posted
June 17, 2024
Study Start
December 20, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 30, 2026
Last Updated
May 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- 1 year after the end of the project. Anonymised data will be available indefinitely on Zenodo with a DOI under a CC0 license.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who are affiliated with a university or research centre. They must provide a rationale for how the study data are relevant to a related study question around spinal cord injury pain. They must have documented training in research integrity. Requests will be reviewed by the study PI and study steering committee prior to granting access.
1 year after the end of the project the master data sheet will be destroyed and anonymised files will be deposited in a secure data repository (Zenodo) with a permanent identifier (DOI) and available to the wider research community under a CC0 license. Participants will have an opportunity to consent or not to anonymised data archiving. In line with HRB Open Research Policy, repositories hosting the data will be cited in research papers.