Comparison of Egoscue Versus Pilates Exercises in Patient With Mechanical Low Back Pain
Comparative Effect of Egoscue Versus Pilates Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion, Flexibility and Muscles Endurance in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mechanical low back pain arises intrinsically from the spine, intervertebral disc,or surrounding soft tissues.It is causes by muscular spasm, and other soft tissue injuries. The aim of the study will be to compare the effect of Egoscue versus Pilates exercises on pain, range of motion and muscle endurance in patient with mechanical low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable low-back-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 11, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 10, 2024
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
2 months
June 11, 2024
October 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS)
Changes from base Line Numeric Pain rating scale is a scale for pain starting from 0-10. where 0 indicate no pain and 10 indicate severe pain.The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
upto 4 weeks
Muscle flexibility (Finger to floor test)
* The patient is asked to bend forward and attempt to reach for the floor with their fingertips. * The physical therapist then measures the distance between the patient's right long finger and the floor using a standard measuring tape * Ask the client whether pain, stiffness or both limit the movement(Fingertips to floor (FTF) test). * If the FTF test is limited by pain, the location and pain score out of 10 should be documented. * If the FTF test is 0cm or the patient is able to place their palms to the floor with no pain, a different outcome measure should be considered.
upto 4 weeks
Trunk Flexor Endurance Test
The flexor endurance test is the first in the battery of three tests that assesses muscular endurance of the deep core muscles (i.e., transverse abdominis, quadratus lumborum, and erector spinae). It is a timed test involving a static, isometric contraction of the anterior muscles, stabilizing the spine until the individual exhibits fatigue and can no longer hold the assumed position.
upto 4 weeks
Trunk Lateral Endurance Test
The trunk lateral endurance test, also called the side-bridge test, assesses muscular endurance of the lateral core muscles (i.e., transverse abdominis, obliques, quadratus lumborum, and erector spinae). Similar to the trunk flexor endurance test, this timed test involves static, isometric contractions of the lateral muscles on each side of the trunk that stabilize the spine.
upto 4 weeks
Trunk Extensor Endurance Test
The trunk extensor endurance test is generally used to assess muscular endurance of the torso extensor muscles (i.e., erector spinae, longissimus, iliocostalis, and multifidi). This is a timed test involving a static, isometric contraction of the trunk extensor muscles that stabilize the spine.
upto 4 weeks
universal goniometer
The purpose of goniometry is to measure the joint angle or range of motion. It is assumed that the angle created by aligning the arms of a universal goniometer with bony landmarks truly represents the angle created by the proximal and distal bones composing the joint.
upt0 4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Group A: Pilates exercise
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup A received the pilates exercise. It doesn't require any special equipment and can be done in any training center. Week 1: Leg slides, hip release, knee to chest, spinal rotation, single knee extension, cat stretch, neutral to imprint Week 2: Imprint table top position, ab prep, Imprint table top toe touching floor, imprint table top knee extensions, spine twist, Ab prep in table top position, bridging Week 3: Half roll back, pull up; pull up with leg extension, swimming exercise, single leg extension, leg circles, and single leg stretch Week 4: Bridging on the ball, spine stretch forward, single leg lift, double knee lifts, upward dog, and shell stretch Each exercise was performed for 5 times
Group B: Egoscue exercise
EXPERIMENTALStatic back and static back with breathing, abdominal contraction while in the static back position, abductor press, overhead extension, elbow curls on wall, static wall, upper spinal twist, pelvic tilts, supine groin progressive, and air bench Week 1: 3 times with 30 s hold time Week 2: 5 times with 30 s hold time Week 3: 15 times with 30 s hold time Week 4: 20 times with 30 s hold time
Interventions
hot pack will be applied for 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 40 years
- Both gender
- Patient with non-radiating pain
- Pain NPRS \<7
- Positive McGill Extensor Endurance Test ( \<101 seconds)
- Positive McGill lateral flexor endurance test (\<54 sec Right side, \<55sec left side)
- Positive McGill flexor endurance test \< 120 seconds
- Positive Finger to Floor Test : \> 48cm in males, \>50cm for females
- Patient with Oswestry disability index (ODI) \< 40 ODI score
- Decrease lumbar ROM; Lateral flexion, Extension, Flexion
You may not qualify if:
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD)
- Coccydynia
- Lumber disc pathology
- Malignancy
- Recent fractures
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Med care hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan
Related Publications (8)
Kudchadkar GS, Gurudut P, Welling AJIJoPT, Research. Comparative effect of mat pilates and egoscue exercises in asymptomatic individuals with lumbar hyperlordosis: A randomized controlled trial. 2019;1(2):79-88.
BACKGROUNDBaillie L, Bacon CJ, Hewitt CM, Moran RW. Predictors of functional improvement in people with chronic low back pain following a graded Pilates-based exercise programme. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jan;23(1):211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
PMID: 30691755BACKGROUNDAltinbilek T, Murat S. A comparison of application frequency of physical therapy modalities in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 May 18;66(2):201-209. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2020.4192. eCollection 2020 Jun.
PMID: 32760898BACKGROUNDJerome EJIJoP. Effects of core stabilization program and conventional exercises in the management of patients with chronic mechanical low back pain. 2015:441-7.
BACKGROUNDCaglayan M, Tacar O, Demirant A, Oktayoglu P, Karakoc M, Cetin A, et al. Effects of lumbosacral angles on development of low back pain. 2014;22(3):251-5.
BACKGROUNDKumar SP. Efficacy of segmental stabilization exercise for lumbar segmental instability in patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized placebo controlled crossover study. N Am J Med Sci. 2011 Oct;3(10):456-61. doi: 10.4297/najms.2011.3456.
PMID: 22363083BACKGROUNDRusso M, Deckers K, Eldabe S, Kiesel K, Gilligan C, Vieceli J, Crosby P. Muscle Control and Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/ner.12738. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
PMID: 29230905BACKGROUNDVining R, Potocki E, Seidman M, Morgenthal AP. An evidence-based diagnostic classification system for low back pain. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2013 Sep;57(3):189-204.
PMID: 23997245BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ghazala Arshad, MSPT*
Riphah International University,Lahore
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 11, 2024
First Posted
June 17, 2024
Study Start
June 30, 2024
Primary Completion
August 30, 2024
Study Completion
October 10, 2024
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share