Long Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Site and Catheter-related Complications in Antimicrobial Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study applies long PIVCs to patients undergoing antimicrobial therapy, and compares the effects of different placement sites, aiming to provide a reference basis for patients undergoing antimicrobial treatment to select the optimal placement site, thus reducing complications, prolonging catheter retention time, and alleviating the patient's pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 25, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedApril 29, 2026
November 1, 2024
7 months
May 30, 2024
April 27, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Incidence of catheter-related complications
Catheter-related complications were assessed including thrombophlebitis, other phlebitis, catheter occlusion, bleeding, catheter-related infections, and weeping.
After insertion of catheter
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Puncture success rate with one-attempt
After insertion of catheter
The procedure time
After insertion of catheter.
Indwelling catheter duration
After insertion of catheter
Study Arms (2)
upper arm
EXPERIMENTAL①Evaluation: The puncture site was determined by senior nurses based on group assignment before placement. The depth and diameter of the pre-punctured vein were measured using ultrasound assessment, and the intima of the pre-punctured vein was examined without applying a tourniquet. ②Catheterization: A 3 Fr, 8 cm tip-opened long PIVC was used. Catheters were placed according to the designated sites for each group using ultrasound-guided and accelerated Seidinger techniques. After confirming catheter placement, needleless connectors and extension were attached, and the catheter was secured without tension using a sterile transparent dressing. ③Maintenance: Specialized nurses were trained to monitor and evaluate catheter function daily. Clinical nurses conducted routine maintenance until the study completion. Daily data were recorded and updated in computerized records.
forearm
OTHER①Evaluation: The puncture site was determined by senior nurses based on group assignment before placement. The depth and diameter of the pre-punctured vein were measured using ultrasound assessment, and the intima of the pre-punctured vein was examined without applying a tourniquet. ②Catheterization: A 3 Fr, 8 cm tip-opened long PIVC was used. Catheters were placed according to the designated sites for each group using ultrasound-guided and accelerated Seidinger techniques. After confirming catheter placement, needleless connectors and extension were attached, and the catheter was secured without tension using a sterile transparent dressing. ③Maintenance: Specialized nurses were trained to monitor and evaluate catheter function daily. Clinical nurses conducted routine maintenance until the study completion. Daily data were recorded and updated in computerized records.
Interventions
A fixed routine for pre-insertion cleaning and equipment was followed, including hand washing, placing the patient in a recumbent position, skin antisepsis, and preparation of the sterile field. Catheter insertion was performed by senior specialized nurses in the intravenous treatment room, which was a standardized setting for venipuncture.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ① estimated time of intravenous infusion ≥1 week; ② age: ≥18 years; ③ antimicrobial therapy was only used for treatment during hospitalization, with a pH value of 5-9 and osmotic pressure \< 900 mOsm/L; and ④ patients were conscious and able to communicate normally; ⑤ the catheter-to-vessel ratio is less than 45%.
You may not qualify if:
- ① a history of radiotherapy, thrombosis, and trauma at the catheterization site and ② plans to discharge with a catheter during the study duration.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, 310016, China
Related Publications (1)
Zhao L, Jin X, Li X, Liu C, Wang J, Cao X, Zeng X, Zhuang Y. Differences in catheter-related complications to insertion site selection for long peripheral intravenous catheters in antimicrobial therapy: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Nurs. 2025 Feb 4;24(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-02749-y.
PMID: 39905387DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhao Linfang
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2024
First Posted
June 12, 2024
Study Start
May 30, 2024
Primary Completion
December 25, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share