Nature-based Therapy Program for Parkinson's Disease (PARC)
PARC
1 other identifier
interventional
11
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a nature-based program has positive effects on the physical and psychosocial health in a group of participants with Parkinson's disease. The main questions it aims to answer are: Will the program improve:
- The physical outcomes such as mobility, strength and balance?
- The psychosocial health outcomes? Participants will:
- Be assessed before and after the program;
- Participate in one session per week of the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 7, 2024
CompletedDecember 6, 2024
December 1, 2024
2 months
May 22, 2024
December 3, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Postural control
Measures of center of pressure (COP) from plateform of force during different balance tasks
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Walking
Gait parameters from GaitRite measurement The participants will be asked to walk at normal and fast speeds on a GaitRite treadmill (GAI-TRite® Platinum) Plus System 16' - 4.876 m, SN: Q209, CIR Systems Inc., Franklin, NJ, USA). Participants will perform each task twice. Main gait parameters will be used as main outcomes such as velocity in m/s.
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Well-being state (WHO-5)
The World Health Organization Well-Being Index (WHO-5) is a widely used self-reported questionnaire designed to measure subjective well-being. It assesses the individual's overall psychological well-being and quality of life. The WHO-5 consists of five simple questions that ask respondents to rate their well-being over the past two weeks. The questions cover aspects such as positive mood, vitality, and general interest in life. The questionnaire is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better well-being.
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Depression state (PHQ-9)
The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered tool used to screen, diagnose, monitor, and measure the severity of depression. It consists of nine questions based on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition).Respondents rate how often they have experienced each symptom over the past two weeks on a scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The scores are then added together to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depressive symptoms
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Social Provisions (SPS-10)
The Social Provisions Scale-10 (SPS-10) is a shorter version of the original Social Provisions Scale (SPS). It is a brief self-report questionnaire designed to measure perceived social support across five dimensions. The SPS-10 is derived from the longer SPS but consists of a subset of items that capture key aspects of social support. Similar to the original SPS, respondents rate their agreement with each item on a Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The SPS-10 provides a quick and efficient way to assess an individual's perceived social support network and their satisfaction with various aspects of their social relationships.
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Connection to nature (CNS)
The Connection to Nature Scale (CNS) is a psychological assessment tool designed to measure an individual's subjective connection to nature. It evaluates the degree to which people perceive themselves as a part of the natural world and the extent to which they appreciate and value nature in their lives. Respondents are asked to rate their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The scores are then totaled to provide an overall measure of an individual's connection to nature.
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Functional mobility test (TUG)
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
5 times Sit-To-Stand (FTSTS)
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Maximal isometric hand grip strength
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Number of falls
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Trunk postural control on wobble chair
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Other Outcomes (4)
Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Frailty criteria from Fried
change from baseline at 0 to 8 weeks
Hoehn and Yahr Scale
Only at baseline from Sample characterization when Parkinson was included
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Nature-based intervention
EXPERIMENTALNature-based group intervention of once a week for 8 weeks
Interventions
Activities in nature such as walking, exercises (strengthening, mobility, balance), pedal boat, yoga, dance, mindfulness, meditation, forest bathing or Shinrin-Yoku, interpretation of nature
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (while medicated: ON);
- capable of walking independently;
- presenting mild to moderate disability symptoms according to the Hoehn and Yahr scale (stages 1-3);
- having a frailty score of less than 2/5 (Fried);
- having a cognitive status ≥26 based on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) questionnaire.
You may not qualify if:
- Cancer;
- Red flags (infection, tumor, etc.);
- Severe psychiatric disorders;
- Palliative care;
- Severe systemic syndromes or diseases that may prevent tests and exercises from being performed;
- Stroke - very acute phase (1 week) and this until medial hemodynamic stability.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Université du Québec à Chicoutimilead
- Réseau Parkinson Québeccollaborator
- McGill Universitycollaborator
- Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québeccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Rubens da Silva
Saguenay, Quebec, G7H 2B1, Canada
Related Publications (12)
Shen X, Wong-Yu IS, Mak MK. Effects of Exercise on Falls, Balance, and Gait Ability in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jul;30(6):512-27. doi: 10.1177/1545968315613447. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
PMID: 26493731BACKGROUNDRay S, Agarwal P. Depression and Anxiety in Parkinson Disease. Clin Geriatr Med. 2020 Feb;36(1):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
PMID: 31733705BACKGROUNDLee I, Choi H, Bang KS, Kim S, Song M, Lee B. Effects of Forest Therapy on Depressive Symptoms among Adults: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;14(3):321. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030321.
PMID: 28335541BACKGROUNDFrumkin H, Bratman GN, Breslow SJ, Cochran B, Kahn PH Jr, Lawler JJ, Levin PS, Tandon PS, Varanasi U, Wolf KL, Wood SA. Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda. Environ Health Perspect. 2017 Jul 31;125(7):075001. doi: 10.1289/EHP1663.
PMID: 28796634BACKGROUNDHvingelby VS, Glud AN, Sorensen JCH, Tai Y, Andersen ASM, Johnsen E, Moro E, Pavese N. Interventions to improve gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2022 Aug;269(8):4068-4079. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11091-1. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
PMID: 35378605BACKGROUNDSherrington C, Tiedemann A. Physiotherapy in the prevention of falls in older people. J Physiother. 2015 Apr;61(2):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2015.02.011. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
PMID: 25797882BACKGROUNDHan JW, Choi H, Jeon YH, Yoon CH, Woo JM, Kim W. The Effects of Forest Therapy on Coping with Chronic Widespread Pain: Physiological and Psychological Differences between Participants in a Forest Therapy Program and a Control Group. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Feb 24;13(3):255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13030255.
PMID: 26927141BACKGROUNDDoll R. Chronic and degenerative disease: major causes of morbidity and death. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 Dec;62(6 Suppl):1301S-1305S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/62.6.1301S.
PMID: 7495224BACKGROUNDSong C, Ikei H, Park BJ, Lee J, Kagawa T, Miyazaki Y. Psychological Benefits of Walking through Forest Areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 10;15(12):2804. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122804.
PMID: 30544682BACKGROUNDDallaire M, Houde-Thibeault A, Bouchard-Tremblay J, Wotto EA, Cote S, Santos Oliveira C, Ngomo S, da Silva RA. Impact of frailty and sex-related differences on postural control and gait in older adults with Parkinson's Disease. Exp Gerontol. 2024 Feb;186:112360. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2024.112360. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
PMID: 38215954BACKGROUNDFried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, Seeman T, Tracy R, Kop WJ, Burke G, McBurnie MA; Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.m146.
PMID: 11253156BACKGROUNDTerra MB, Da Silva RA, Bueno MEB, Ferraz HB, Smaili SM. Center of pressure-based balance evaluation in individuals with Parkinson's disease: a reliability study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020 Jul;36(7):826-833. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1508261. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
PMID: 30118638BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rubens da Silva, PhD
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
- STUDY CHAIR
Marie-Ève Langelier, MD
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
- STUDY CHAIR
Émilie Fortin, PT
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
- STUDY CHAIR
Mireille Cliche, SW
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director and professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2024
First Posted
June 11, 2024
Study Start
August 5, 2024
Primary Completion
October 7, 2024
Study Completion
October 7, 2024
Last Updated
December 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share