No Code Artificial Intelligence to Detect Radiographic Features Associated With Unsatisfactory Endodontic Treatment
Implementing a Corrective Annotation No Code Artificial Intelligence-based Software to Detect Several Radiographic Features Associated With Unsatisfactory Endodontic Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Developing neural network-based models for image analysis can be time-consuming, requiring dataset design and model training. No-code AI platforms allow users to annotate object features without coding. Corrective annotation, a "human-in-the-loop" approach, refines AI segmentations iteratively. Dentistry has seen success with no-code AI for segmenting dental restorations. This study aims to assess radiographic features related to root canal treatment quality using a "human-in-the-loop" approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 13, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 13, 2024
CompletedJune 25, 2024
June 1, 2024
4 months
May 25, 2024
June 24, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Accuracy
Accuracy represents how closely a result aligns with the true value or standard. Accuracy of participants at experiment and control group in correctly finding the radiographic features and predicting the outcomes is one of our primary outcomes. the reference for the comparison is the consensus of three experts in dentistry.
through data collection, an average of 6 months
Sensitivity
This measure quantifies the proportion of true positive results (correctly identified cases) out of all positive cases. High sensitivity indicates that one is good at detecting the condition. Sensitivity of participants at experiment and control group in correctly finding the radiographic features and predicting the outcomes is one of our primary outcomes. The comparison is made against the consensus judgment of three experts in dentistry.
through data collection, an average of 6 months
Specificity
Specificity measures the proportion of true negative results out of all negative cases. Specificity of participants at experiment and control group in correctly finding the radiographic features and predicting the outcomes is one of our primary outcomes. The comparison is made against the consensus judgment of three experts in dentistry.
through data collection, an average of 6 months
Study Arms (2)
participants using guidance from artificial Intelligence
EXPERIMENTALthe experimental arm refers to the group of participants who have access to the AI-based platform for detecting features associated with the technical quality of endodontic treatment. These participants will utilize the AI assistance during the study.
Control arm without any guidance from artificial Intelligence
NO INTERVENTIONthe control arm consists of participants who do not have access to the AI-based platform. They will perform the same tasks or assessments as those in the experimental arm but without the assistance of AI.
Interventions
A secured website was made for the trial in which each student could log in using the assigned number. All the image datasets were uploaded to this website. The students will be randomly assigned to the experiment and control group. Both students were asked to segment the features associated with the quality of root canal treatment and predict the prognosis of treatment while the experiment group had access to AI guidance and the control group didn't.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being a last year dental student at the university of Copenhagen
You may not qualify if:
- Having any previous AI-related experiences
- Not accepting to sign the informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Copenhagenlead
- Queen Mary University of Londoncollaborator
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lars Bjørndal, Prof.
University of Copenhagen Department of Odontology Cariology and Endodontics
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 25, 2024
First Posted
June 10, 2024
Study Start
July 30, 2024
Primary Completion
November 13, 2024
Study Completion
December 13, 2024
Last Updated
June 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share