Head-to-Head Comparison of All Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Products for Glabellar Rhytides
Head-to-Head Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of All Five Commercially Available Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A Products for the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytides: A Multicenter, Triple-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Study Type: This is a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Purpose: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness and safety of all five commercially available Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A (BoNT-A) products for treating glabellar rhytides, commonly known as frown lines. This study is designed to provide comprehensive data on how these treatments compare in terms of improving frown lines and the duration of their effects. Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer: Which BoNT-A product provides the longest lasting effect on reducing glabellar rhytides? How do these products compare in terms of safety and the occurrence of side effects? Participant Tasks: Women aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe glabellar lines will participate. Participants will receive injections of a BoNT-A product into specific facial muscles. They will need to take weekly photographs using their smartphones to document changes in their frown lines. These photos will be securely sent to our research team for analysis. Participants will complete questionnaires at the start and end of the study to assess their satisfaction, quality of life, and any changes in their condition. Comparison Group: Researchers will compare participants receiving different types of BoNT-A products to see which one is more effective at reducing frown lines and maintaining these effects over time. The safety profiles of these products will also be compared to determine which has the fewest and least severe side effects. This study aims to fill important gaps in our understanding of Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A treatments, guiding more effective clinical decisions and improving patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
9 months
June 3, 2024
September 3, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of Clinical Efficacy
Period until loss of treatment effect, measured as the percentage of participants who maintain at least a 1-point improvement in glabellar line severity at maximum frown from baseline to week 16, assessed using the "four-point clinical severity score for glabellar frown lines" developed by Honeck.
From baseline to week 16
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Duration of Clinical Efficacy
Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models to analyze the time to complete loss of effect across the entire study duration (From baseline to week 30)
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs)
From baseline to week 16
Quality of Life (FACE-Q)
From baseline to week 16
Social Functioning (FACE-Q)
From baseline to week 16
Satisfaction with the Result (FACE-Q)
From baseline to week 16
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (7)
OnabotulinumtoxinA: 20 units
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 units (4-4-4-4-4) Commercial Name: Botox® Producing Company: Allergan, an AbbVie company Location: Dublin, Ireland Additional Commercial Names: Vistabel® (in some regions, especially Europe)
IncobotulinumtoxinA: 20 units
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 units (4-4-4-4-4) Commercial Name: Xeomin® Producing Company: Merz Pharmaceuticals Location: Frankfurt, Germany Additional Commercial Names: Bocouture® (for aesthetic use in some regions)
AbobotulinumtoxinA: 50 (Speywood) units
ACTIVE COMPARATOR50 units (10-10-10-10-10) Commercial Name: Dysport® Producing Company: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. Location: Paris, France Additional Commercial Names: Azzalure® (for aesthetic use in some regions)
AbobotulinumtoxinA: 60 (Speywood) units
ACTIVE COMPARATOR60 units (12-12-12-12-12) Commercial Name: Dysport® Producing Company: Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. Location: Paris, France Additional Commercial Names: Azzalure® (for aesthetic use in some regions)
PrabotulinumtoxinA 20 units
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 units (4-4-4-4-4) Commercial Name: Jeuveau® Producing Company: Evolus, Inc. Location: Newport Beach, California, USA Additional Commercial Names: Nuceiva® (for aesthetic use in some regions)
Excluded: DaxibotulinumtoxinA 20 units (reason for exclusion: not available in the EU)
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 units (4-4-4-4-4) Commercial Name: Daxxify® Producing Company: Revance Therapeutics, Inc. Location: Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Excluded: LetibotulinumtoxinA-wlbg: 20 units (reason for exclusion: not available in the EU).
ACTIVE COMPARATORArm Description: 20 units (4-4-4-4-4) Commercial Name: Letybo® Producing Company: Hugel Inc. Location: Chuncheon-si, South Korea
Interventions
Head-to-head comparison of all commercially available botulinum neurotoxin type A products
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women aged 18 years or over, with moderate to severe glabellar lines
- Willing to provide written informed consent
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification 1 or 2
You may not qualify if:
- ASA Classification 3 or over
- History of hypersensitivity or adverse reactions to botulinum toxin or any of its components
- Infection at the injection site
- Previous treatment with botulinum toxin (lifetime)
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Neuromuscular disorders or conditions that could interfere with the study assessments
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (19)
Decates T, de Wijs L, Nijsten T, Velthuis P. Numbers on injectable treatments in the Netherlands in 2016. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018 Aug;32(8):e328-e330. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14877. Epub 2018 Mar 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 29444367BACKGROUNDDecates TS, Velthuis P, Zarringam D, Bruin L, Schepers RH, van der Lei B. Upward trend in number of injectable treatments in the Netherlands 2016-2019. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2021 Sep;20(9):3049-3051. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14339. Epub 2021 Jul 19. No abstract available.
PMID: 34403196BACKGROUNDSteenen SA, Bauland CG, de Lange J, van der Lei B. Complications After Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A and Dermal Filler Injections: Data From a Large Retrospective Cohort Study. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Jan 9;43(1):NP56-NP63. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac228. No abstract available.
PMID: 35953448BACKGROUNDJia Z, Lu H, Yang X, Jin X, Wu R, Zhao J, Chen L, Qi Z. Adverse Events of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Facial Rejuvenation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;40(5):769-77. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0682-1. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
PMID: 27495260BACKGROUNDZargaran D, Zoller FE, Zargaran A, Mosahebi A. Complications of facial cosmetic botulinum toxin A injection: analysis of the UK Medicines & Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency registry and literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):392-401. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.05.074. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
PMID: 34456155BACKGROUNDGostimir M, Liou V, Yoon MK. Safety of Botulinum Toxin A Injections for Facial Rejuvenation: A Meta-Analysis of 9,669 Patients. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb 01;39(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002169. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
PMID: 35353777BACKGROUNDZargaran D, Zoller F, Zargaran A, Rahman E, Woollard A, Weyrich T, Mosahebi A. Complications of Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin A Injections to the Upper Face: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2022 Apr 12;42(5):NP327-NP336. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjac036.
PMID: 35178552BACKGROUNDLi X, Sui C, Xia X, Chen X. Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Treatment of Glabellar Lines: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Feb;47(1):365-377. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03018-y. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
PMID: 36097079BACKGROUNDKerscher M, Fabi S, Fischer T, Gold M, Joseph J, Prager W, Rzany B, Yoelin S, Roll S, Klein G, Maas C. IncobotulinumtoxinA Demonstrates Safety and Prolonged Duration of Effect in a Dose-Ranging Study for Glabellar Lines. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Oct 1;20(10):1052-1060. doi: 10.36849/JDD.6377.
PMID: 34636520BACKGROUNDPolacco MA, Singleton AE, Barnes CH, Maas C, Maas CS. A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial to Determine Effects of Increasing Doses and Dose-Response Relationship of IncobotulinumtoxinA in the Treatment of Glabellar Rhytids. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 May 18;41(6):NP500-NP511. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa220.
PMID: 32722793BACKGROUNDJoseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Dayan S, Berg AK, Munavalli G. AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines: A Randomized, Dose-Escalating, Double-Blind Study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Sep 1;20(9):980-987. doi: 10.36849/jdd.6263.
PMID: 34491016BACKGROUNDLorenc ZP, Adelglass JM, Avelar RL, Baumann L, Beer KR, Cohen JL, Cox SE, Dayan SH, Dover JS, Downie JB, Draelos ZD, Goldman MP, Gross JE, Joseph JH, Kaufman-Janette J, Moy RL, Nestor M, Schlessinger J, Smith SR, Weiss RA. The Second of Two One-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Repeat-Dose, Phase II Safety Studies of PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients. Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):1423-1438. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaa382.
PMID: 33944913BACKGROUNDTaylor SC, Grimes PE, Joseph JH, Jonker A, Avelar RL. PrabotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Glabellar Lines in Adult Patients With Skin of Color: Post Hoc Analyses of the US Phase III Clinical Study Data. Dermatol Surg. 2021 Apr 1;47(4):516-521. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002864.
PMID: 33165078BACKGROUNDDayan S, Joseph J, Moradi A, Lorenc ZP, Coleman K, Ablon G, Kaufman-Janette J, Cox SE, Campbell A, Munavalli G, Prygova I. Subject satisfaction and psychological well-being with escalating abobotulinumtoxinA injection dose for the treatment of moderate to severe glabellar lines. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022 Jun;21(6):2407-2416. doi: 10.1111/jocd.14906. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
PMID: 35266281BACKGROUNDBertucci V, Solish N, Kaufman-Janette J, Yoelin S, Shamban A, Schlessinger J, Snyder D, Gallagher C, Liu Y, Shears G, Rubio RG. DaxibotulinumtoxinA for Injection has a prolonged duration of response in the treatment of glabellar lines: Pooled data from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies (SAKURA 1 and SAKURA 2). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Apr;82(4):838-845. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.06.1313. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
PMID: 31791824BACKGROUNDSteenen SA, Bauland CG, van der Lei B, Su N, van Engelen MDG, Anandbahadoer-Sitaldin RDRRAL, Koeiman W, Jawidan T, Hamraz Y, Lange J. Head-to-head comparison of 4 hyaluronic acid dermal fillers for lip augmentation: A multicenter randomized, quadruple-blind, controlled clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Apr;88(4):932-935. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Nov 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 36370906BACKGROUNDShome D, Kapoor R, Khare S. Two different types of botulinum toxins: Is there a difference in efficacy and longevity? J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Dec;18(6):1635-1641. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12949. Epub 2019 May 28.
PMID: 31135088BACKGROUNDBohart Z, Dashtipour K, Kim H, Schwartz M, Zuzek A, Singh R, Nelson M. Real-world differences in dosing and clinical utilization of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of upper limb spasticity. Toxicon. 2024 Apr;241:107678. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2024.107678. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
PMID: 38447766BACKGROUNDHoneck P, Weiss C, Sterry W, Rzany B; Gladys study group. Reproducibility of a four-point clinical severity score for glabellar frown lines. Br J Dermatol. 2003 Aug;149(2):306-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05436.x.
PMID: 12932236BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan de Lange, MD DMD PhD
Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Trial participants, data collectors, the statistician, and outcome assessors were blinded to the study-group assignments. Blinded syringes are labeled a sticker containing no information other than the allocated study number. After reconstitution, syringes were stored under hygienic non-sterile conditions between 39-46F in medical refrigerators. The safety related to this sterile transfer is substantiated by several studies.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. dr. Jan de Lange, MD DMD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2024
First Posted
June 7, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09