Aesthetic Outcome of Intra-dermal Versus Transcutaneous Purse-string Closure
1 other identifier
interventional
73
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether intra-dermal versus transcutaneous purse-string closures have similar scar cosmesis and post-operative complications. The investigators will use a split wound model, where half of the wound will be closed with intra-dermal purse-string sutures and the other half will be closed with a transcutaneous purse-string sutures. Three-months post-surgery, the scar will be evaluated via the patient observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), a validated scar instrument, as well as the trace-to-tape method, an objective outcome measure for linear postoperative scars. Any adverse events will also be recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 14, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2027
January 29, 2026
January 1, 2026
1.2 years
June 3, 2024
January 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Observer Scar Assessment as measured by Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
The primary endpoint will be the score of two blinded reviewers independently using the POSAS assessment. The observer scale of the POSAS consists of six items (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface area). All items are scored on a scale ranging from 1 ("like normal skin") to 10 ("worst scar imaginable"). The sum of the six items results in a total score of the POSAS observer scale. Furthermore, an overall opinion is scored on a scale ranging from 1 to 10. All parameters should preferably be compared to normal skin on a comparable anatomic location.
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient Scar Assessment as measured by Patient Observer Scar Assessment Score (POSAS)
3 months
Width of Scar as measured using Trace-to-Tape Method
3 months
Complications or Adverse Events from Treatment
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Intra-dermal purse-string closure on Side A
EXPERIMENTALFor all participants, one wound side half will be labeled as A and the other side as B. Side A will be closed with a intra-dermal purse-string closure, and Side B will be closed with a transcutaneous purse-string closure.
Intra-dermal purse-string closure on Side B
EXPERIMENTALFor all participants, one wound side half will be labeled as A and the other side as B. Side B will be closed with a intra-dermal purse-string closure, and Side A will be closed with a transcutaneous purse-string closure.
Interventions
Sutures are placed below the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and the ends are cinched together like a coin purse.
Sutures are placed through the skin surface around a circular surgical wound, and cinched together like a coin purse.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Able to give informed consent themselves
- Patient scheduled for cutaneous surgical procedure on the head, neck, trunk, or extremities with predicted purse-string closure.
- Willing to return for follow up visit
You may not qualify if:
- Incarceration
- Under 18 years of age
- Pregnant Women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Davis - Dermatology Department
Sacramento, California, 95816, United States
Related Publications (9)
Joo J, Custis T, Armstrong AW, King TH, Omlin K, Kappel ST, Eisen DB. Purse-string suture vs second intention healing: results of a randomized, blind clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Mar;151(3):265-70. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.2313.
PMID: 25372450BACKGROUNDScholl L, Meier NM, Hessam S, Valavanis K, Bechara FG. Subcuticular and cuticular purse-string sutures in dermatologic surgery. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016 Feb;14(2):196-8. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12896. Epub 2016 Jan 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 26788857BACKGROUNDFioramonti P, Sorvillo V, Maruccia M, Lo Torto F, Marcasciano M, Ribuffo D, Cigna E. New application of purse string suture in skin cancer surgery. Int Wound J. 2018 Dec;15(6):893-899. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12941. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
PMID: 29956469BACKGROUNDPark S, Oh Y, Lee JW, Choi S, Nam KA, Roh MR, Chung KY. Various Applications of Purse-String Suture and Its Cosmetic Outcome in Cutaneous Surgical Defects. Ann Dermatol. 2023 Apr;35(2):100-106. doi: 10.5021/ad.21.263.
PMID: 37041703BACKGROUNDCohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR. The cuticular purse string suture: a modified purse string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Jul;46(7):746-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03253.x.
PMID: 17614809BACKGROUNDCohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR. The purse-string suture revisited: a useful technique for the closure of cutaneous surgical wounds. Int J Dermatol. 2007 Apr;46(4):341-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03204.x.
PMID: 17442069BACKGROUNDWeisberg NK, Greenbaum SS. Revisiting the purse-string closure: some new methods and modifications. Dermatol Surg. 2003 Jun;29(6):672-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29160.x.
PMID: 12786718BACKGROUNDLam TK, Lowe C, Johnson R, Marquart JD. Secondary Intention Healing and Purse-String Closures. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Oct;41 Suppl 10:S178-86. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000480.
PMID: 26418684BACKGROUNDRaposio E, Antonacci M, Caruana G. A simple technique for the excision of cutaneous carcinoma: the round block purse-string suture. World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug 20;12:263. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-263.
PMID: 25142636BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniel Eisen, MD
University of California, Davis - Dermatology
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Two blinded observers will record their scores independently using the POSAS instrument.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2024
First Posted
June 7, 2024
Study Start
October 14, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01