Functional Residual Capacity and Alveolar Recruitment in Single-lung Ventilation: a Randomized Study

NCT06446544 | Not Yet Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: 2021/0383/HP
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 44
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

In thoracic surgery, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications is higher than for other surgeries. Indeed, thoracic surgery has the specificity of being carried out with single-lung ventilation and is thus a source of intraoperative atelectasis which persists postoperatively and gives rise to pulmonary complications, particularly infectious ones. During one-lung ventilation, mediastinal and abdominal compression on the ventilated lung leads to a drop in functional residual capacity (FRC) which will in turn lead to collapse of the small airways leading to the formation of atelectasis. Strategies exist to limit the appearance of atelectasis. One of the intraoperative strategies is alveolar recruitment. Alveolar recruitment is a dynamic process that can be defined by a transient increase in transpulmonary pressure beyond the critical opening pressure. Physiologically, alveolar recruitment corresponds to the re-aeration of poorly or non-aerated lung areas. In single-lung ventilation, intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers are not performed systematically to prevent the formation of atelectasis. The General Electric Carescape R860 ventilator allows intraoperative monitoring of end-expiratory closing lung volume (EFVP), which corresponds to the CRF associated with positive expiratory pressure (PEEP). This spirometry incorporated in the ventilator continuously monitors the intraoperative variation of VPFE, thus making it possible to detect any significant decrease which would favor the formation of intraoperative atelectasis. Early detection of VPFE can therefore allow the anesthetist-resuscitator to initiate intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers adapted to the patient. Alveolar recruitment maneuvers are then personalized and based on precise monitoring of the evolution of the VPFE. The effectiveness of recruitment maneuvers can be evaluated and quantified (with the Lung Ultrasound Score (LUS)) postoperatively using pleuropulmonary ultrasound. Thus, early ultrasound detection, from the post-interventional monitoring room (SSPI), would make it possible to undertake rapid therapeutic maneuvers to combat the atelectasis observed. A patient could benefit, for example, from prophylactic NIV from the recovery room, from a stricter postural program in a seated position, or from an earlier and/or more intensive respiratory rehabilitation program with the physiotherapy team.

Conditions

Lung Injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Evaluate the effect of VPFE monitoring with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers compared to VPFE monitoring without intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers on pulmonary aeration of the ventilated lung

  The primary endpoint will be the value of the LUS (Lung Ultrasound Score) score on the ventilated lung at the time of lung ultrasound in SSPI, 30 minutes after extubation (presence of atelectasis with a LUS score \> or = 10/18).

  30 min post-extubation

Study Arms (2)

arm monitoring of the VPFE with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers

EXPERIMENTAL

arm monitoring of the VPFE with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers

Procedure: VPFE monitoring with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers.

VPFE monitoring arm without intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers.

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

VPFE monitoring arm without intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers.

Procedure: VPFE monitoring with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers.

Interventions

VPFE monitoring with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers. PROCEDURE

VPFE monitoring with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers.

arm monitoring of the VPFE with intraoperative alveolar recruitment maneuvers

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 75 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may not qualify if:

• Patients aged 76 and over
• COPD patients (Gold stage 3 or 4 of the 2023 Gold classification)
• Patients with a history of ischemic coronary artery disease
• Patients with a history of pulmonary emphysema bubbles on the ventilated lung
• Tracheostomized patient
• Obese patients (\>30 kg/m²)
• Patients with a history of pulmonary resection
• ASA patients ≥4
• Patient benefiting from a pre-operative rehabilitation protocol with physiotherapy
• Pregnant or parturient or breastfeeding woman or proven absence of contraception
• Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under judicial protection/under guardianship or curatorship
• History of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol or preventing them from giving informed consent
• Patient refusing to give consent.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University Hospital, Rouen: lead

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Lung Injury

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung Diseases; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Thoracic Injuries; Wounds and Injuries

Central Study Contacts

David Mallet

CONTACT

02 32 88 82 65; nell.marty@chu-rouen.fr

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 26, 2024
• First Posted: June 6, 2024
• Study Start: March 1, 2026
• Primary Completion (Estimated): April 1, 2028
• Study Completion (Estimated): April 1, 2028
• Last Updated: February 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share