The Case of "Triple" Versus "Double" Therapy for Patients With High Volume Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Lead4Care
Longitudinal Evaluation of Adding Docetaxel to ADT and Novel Hormone Treatment for Patients With High Volume Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer in Order to Assess Relative Effectiveness: the Case of "Triple" Versus "Double" Therapy
1 other identifier
observational
1,400
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Lead4Care is an observational, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the effectiveness, tolerance, and cost-effectiveness of triple against double therapy in matched groups of mHSPC patients with high tumor burden. In addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the triple constitutes of docetaxel and novel hormonal therapy (NHT), and the double of NHT therapy in addition to ADT. Their effectiveness is compared in terms of mortality and morbidity, which is captured by HRQoL, pain, fatigue. Potential side effects are captured by neuropathy, diarrhea, constipation, anxiety, sickness, and dyssomnia. The cost-effectiveness is evaluated within a Markov model from a societal perspective in which the main disease stages are mHSPC, mCRPC and death. In connection with a regular visit in hospital care, prostate cancer patients who in addition to ADT will initiate double or triple therapy are offered participation in the study. If the patient consent on-line, the patient will receive 13 online surveys over a 60-month period. The surveys are sent with an interval of two months for the first six months, quarterly thereafter until two years, and thereafter yearly. Once all participants have been recruited, the baseline data shared by healthcare personnel and patients will be enriched with registry data. This baseline and registry data involves information about the patients' historical and current health- and socioeconomic status. Thereby, Lead4Care will be able to identify comparable groups of patients on triple and double treatments by using advanced matching methods. In order to assure an objective analysis, Lead4Care will not allow any data extraction until Lead4Care has predefined and published all details regarding the comparison. The existing protocol is then complemented with a more detailed description of the comparison groups, the hierarchy of outcomes, and the analysis methods for these outcomes. For these treatments, the main objectives are to:
- Compare mortality and morbidity on triple and double therapy, and their relative side-effects.
- Capture patient preferences for these different treatment outcomes over time.
- Evaluate cost-effectiveness of triple versus double therapy from a societal perspective.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2024
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 20, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2031
March 4, 2025
February 1, 2025
2.2 years
May 31, 2024
February 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mortality
Death due to any causes, i.e., overall survival (OS). captured by the Swedish National Cause of Death Register.
: Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60 and thereafter annually until month 144 (12 years).
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Fatigue
Measured at baseline and month 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60.
Time to progression
Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60.
Time to first line treatment of mCRPC
Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60 and thereafter annually until month 144 (12 years).
Pain intensity
Measured at baseline and month 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60.
Other Outcomes (5)
Skeleton Related Events (SRE)
Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60 and thereafter annually until month 144 (12 years).
General Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL)
Measured at baseline and month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60.
Side effects
Measured at baseline and month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 36, 48 and 60.
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Triple therapy
Patients with mHSPC and high tumour burden receiving treatment with androgen deprivation treatment, new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide) and docetaxel.
Double therapy
Patients with mHSPC and high tumour burden receiving treatment with androgen deprivation treatment and new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide).
Interventions
Lead4Care leaves the treatment choice to the clinicians and the patients, i.e., does not intervene in their choice of treatment. However, Lead4Care proxy a randomized controlled experiment in which the intervention would be to add docetaxel to androgen deprivation treatment, new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide). This involves a comparison of triple and double therapies. This group recives the triple therapy, i.e. ADT, NHT and Docetaxel.
Lead4Care leaves the treatment choice to the clinicians and the patients, i.e., does not intervene in their choice of treatment. However, Lead4Care proxy a randomized controlled experiment in which the intervention would be to add docetaxel to androgen deprivation treatment, new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide). This involves a comparison of triple and double therapies. This group recives double therapy, i.e. they are receiving NHT and ADT, but not Docetaxel.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with mHSPC and high tumor burden initiating treatment with triple or double therapy.
You may qualify if:
- Patients should have initiated triple or double therapy no longer than 3 months from the start of ADT,
- Patients must have mHSPC at the time of enrolment, and high metastatic burden.
- Patients must be ≥ 18 years old at the time of enrolment. Note: NHT could be abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not understand written and/or oral instructions in Swedish.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uppsala Universitylead
- Uppsala University Hospitalcollaborator
- University Hospital, Umeåcollaborator
- Sahlgrenska University Hospitalcollaborator
- Saint Göran Hospitalcollaborator
- Swedish Cancer Societycollaborator
- Uddevalla Hospitalcollaborator
- Östersund Hospitalcollaborator
- Ryhov County Hospitalcollaborator
- Mälarsjukhuset Hospital, Eskilstunacollaborator
- Västmanlands Hospital, Västerås, Swedencollaborator
- Gävle Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Uppsala University Hospital
Uppsala, Region Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden
Uppsala University
Uppsala, Uppsala County, 753 10, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sophie Langenskiöld, SRLECT & PhD
Uppsala University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 31, 2024
First Posted
June 6, 2024
Study Start
October 20, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2031
Last Updated
March 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02