NCT06446401

Brief Summary

Lead4Care is an observational, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the effectiveness, tolerance, and cost-effectiveness of triple against double therapy in matched groups of mHSPC patients with high tumor burden. In addition to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the triple constitutes of docetaxel and novel hormonal therapy (NHT), and the double of NHT therapy in addition to ADT. Their effectiveness is compared in terms of mortality and morbidity, which is captured by HRQoL, pain, fatigue. Potential side effects are captured by neuropathy, diarrhea, constipation, anxiety, sickness, and dyssomnia. The cost-effectiveness is evaluated within a Markov model from a societal perspective in which the main disease stages are mHSPC, mCRPC and death. In connection with a regular visit in hospital care, prostate cancer patients who in addition to ADT will initiate double or triple therapy are offered participation in the study. If the patient consent on-line, the patient will receive 13 online surveys over a 60-month period. The surveys are sent with an interval of two months for the first six months, quarterly thereafter until two years, and thereafter yearly. Once all participants have been recruited, the baseline data shared by healthcare personnel and patients will be enriched with registry data. This baseline and registry data involves information about the patients' historical and current health- and socioeconomic status. Thereby, Lead4Care will be able to identify comparable groups of patients on triple and double treatments by using advanced matching methods. In order to assure an objective analysis, Lead4Care will not allow any data extraction until Lead4Care has predefined and published all details regarding the comparison. The existing protocol is then complemented with a more detailed description of the comparison groups, the hierarchy of outcomes, and the analysis methods for these outcomes. For these treatments, the main objectives are to:

  • Compare mortality and morbidity on triple and double therapy, and their relative side-effects.
  • Capture patient preferences for these different treatment outcomes over time.
  • Evaluate cost-effectiveness of triple versus double therapy from a societal perspective.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
69mo left

Started Oct 2024

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress22%
Oct 2024Dec 2031

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 6, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 20, 2024

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2026

Expected
5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2031

Last Updated

March 4, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Prostate cancermHSPCComparative effectiveness evaluationTriple therapyDouble therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mortality

    Death due to any causes, i.e., overall survival (OS). captured by the Swedish National Cause of Death Register.

    : Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60 and thereafter annually until month 144 (12 years).

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Fatigue

    Measured at baseline and month 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60.

  • Time to progression

    Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60.

  • Time to first line treatment of mCRPC

    Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60 and thereafter annually until month 144 (12 years).

  • Pain intensity

    Measured at baseline and month 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48, and 60.

Other Outcomes (5)

  • Skeleton Related Events (SRE)

    Measured at month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48, 60 and thereafter annually until month 144 (12 years).

  • General Health-Related Quality of life (HRQoL)

    Measured at baseline and month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 and 60.

  • Side effects

    Measured at baseline and month 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24 36, 48 and 60.

  • +2 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Triple therapy

Patients with mHSPC and high tumour burden receiving treatment with androgen deprivation treatment, new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide) and docetaxel.

Drug: ADT + NHT + Docetaxel

Double therapy

Patients with mHSPC and high tumour burden receiving treatment with androgen deprivation treatment and new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide).

Drug: ADT + NHT

Interventions

Lead4Care leaves the treatment choice to the clinicians and the patients, i.e., does not intervene in their choice of treatment. However, Lead4Care proxy a randomized controlled experiment in which the intervention would be to add docetaxel to androgen deprivation treatment, new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide). This involves a comparison of triple and double therapies. This group recives the triple therapy, i.e. ADT, NHT and Docetaxel.

Triple therapy

Lead4Care leaves the treatment choice to the clinicians and the patients, i.e., does not intervene in their choice of treatment. However, Lead4Care proxy a randomized controlled experiment in which the intervention would be to add docetaxel to androgen deprivation treatment, new hormone therapy (abiraterone, apalutamide, enzalutamide or darolutamide). This involves a comparison of triple and double therapies. This group recives double therapy, i.e. they are receiving NHT and ADT, but not Docetaxel.

Double therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with mHSPC and high tumor burden initiating treatment with triple or double therapy.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients should have initiated triple or double therapy no longer than 3 months from the start of ADT,
  • Patients must have mHSPC at the time of enrolment, and high metastatic burden.
  • Patients must be ≥ 18 years old at the time of enrolment. Note: NHT could be abiraterone acetate, apalutamide, darolutamide or enzalutamide.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who do not understand written and/or oral instructions in Swedish.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Uppsala University Hospital

Uppsala, Region Uppsala, 751 85, Sweden

NOT YET RECRUITING

Uppsala University

Uppsala, Uppsala County, 753 10, Sweden

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Interventions

Androgen AntagonistsDocetaxel

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hormone AntagonistsHormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone AntagonistsPhysiological Effects of DrugsPharmacologic ActionsChemical Actions and UsesTaxoidsCyclodecanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsDiterpenesTerpenes

Study Officials

  • Sophie Langenskiöld, SRLECT & PhD

    Uppsala University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Sophie Langenskiöld, SRLECT & PhD

CONTACT

Vincent Nordgren, PhD-student

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Posted

June 6, 2024

Study Start

October 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2031

Last Updated

March 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations