Benefits of a Belly Dance Psychomotor Intervention
Effects of Psychomotor Intervention Program Mediated by Belly Dance in Adults Women.
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the present study is to analyze the effects of a psychomotor intervention program mediated by belly dance in adult women. This Quasi-experimental study is a controlled trial with one arm. Participants will be allocated to one group which will be i) control and ii) experimental. That is at first i) will attend a control period without intervention (6 weeks) and at second ii) will attend an intervention period participating on the intervention program mediated by belly dance (12 weeks). Participants will be accessed at a baseline, at post control and at post intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 30, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2024
CompletedJune 4, 2024
May 1, 2024
6 months
May 30, 2024
May 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Balance and Postural Control outcome measure assessed by Modified Star Excursion Balance Test (MSEBT); stand stork test and standing stork test (blind).
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Agility outcome measure assessed by Hexagonal Obstacle Test.
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Rhythm perception and reproduction assessed by Go No Go Test
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Body Awareness outcome measure assessed by the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), ranging an 8-scale state-trait questionnaire with 32 items and the Awareness-Body-Chart test (ABC).
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Body Image outcome measure will assessed using the Body Investment Scale (BIS), ranging with a Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Image of movement outcome measure will accessed using the miq-3 test, made up of three subscales to assess the kinesthetic and visual modalities; and two Likert-type subscales with 7 levels of response, ranging from "very difficult" to "very easy".
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Change from Baseline to post control and to post intervention
Mood States outcome measure will accessed using the Poms Mood Test with a likert scale with a score of 0 "not at all" and 5 "very much".
[ 0, 6 weeks] vs. [0,12 weeks]
Study Arms (1)
Control and Experimental Group
OTHERThe same group, will do the intervention will attend the belly dance program. The control group will maintain the usually daily activities, not attending any exercise program for a month and a half, and than will be a experimental group with 2 sessions / week of 60 minutes on alternated days.
Interventions
All Belly Dance sessions comprised 5 phases: 1) opening ritual (5 min), in which participants will be welcomed and perceived how people were feeling. 2) warm-up (15 min), in which thinking and feeling are integrated during the movements, isolating each part of the body according to Laban's body organization. 3) main phase (30 min), will be proposed individual, pair and group activities, in order to achieve the objectives planned. This phase will end with a choreography composition or a challenge; 4) cool-down (5 min) with stretching and physiological parameters normalization; and 5) ending ritual (5 min), in which the participants will be invented to share their sessions' experience.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Woman aged \> 17 years and \<60 years
- Availability to participate in the program
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination);
- Presence of motor impairment, neurological problems or diseases compromising the program participation;
- Unavailability to participate in the program.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Simone Leara Barroso Pereira
Evora, Portugal
Related Publications (5)
Barranco-Ruiz Y, Paz-Viteri S, Villa-Gonzalez E. Dance Fitness Classes Improve the Health-Related Quality of Life in Sedentary Women. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3771. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113771.
PMID: 32466496RESULTBoing L, Baptista F, Pereira GS, Sperandio FF, Moratelli J, Cardoso AA, Borgatto AF, de Azevedo Guimaraes AC. Benefits of belly dance on quality of life, fatigue, and depressive symptoms in women with breast cancer - A pilot study of a non-randomised clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2018 Apr;22(2):460-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2017.10.003. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
PMID: 29861250RESULTCastrillon T, Hanney WJ, Rothschild CE, Kolber MJ, Liu X, Masaracchio M. The effects of a standardized belly dance program on perceived pain, disability, and function in women with chronic low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017;30(3):477-496. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150504.
PMID: 27858690RESULTHernandes JC, Di Castro VC, Mendonca ME, Porto CC. Quality of life of women who practice dance: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 10;7(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0750-5.
PMID: 29991355RESULTToberna CP, Horter D, Heslin K, Forgie MM, Malloy E, Kram JJF. Dancing During Labor: Social Media Trend or Future Practice? J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2020 Apr 27;7(2):213-217. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1723. eCollection 2020 Spring.
PMID: 32377554RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MS
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 30, 2024
First Posted
June 4, 2024
Study Start
April 1, 2024
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
October 30, 2024
Last Updated
June 4, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share