EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing CarE
EXPEDITE
1 other identifier
observational
500,000
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study seeks to understand the impact of Canada's adult day program on attendees and non-attendees, especially those with dementia and other co-morbidities. A retrospective cohort study will be conducted, including older adults in the community who do or do not attend adult day programs in Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba, Canada. The objectives are to (1) compare patterns of day program use (including non-use) by Canadian province (Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba), and time, (2) compare characteristics of older adults by day program use pattern (including non-use), province, and time, and (3) to examine whether those who are exposed to day programs, compared to a propensity-score matched comparison group of non-exposed older adults in the community, enter long-term care homes at later times (primary outcome), are less likely to have depressive symptoms, physical and cognitive change, and have lower use of primary, acute, and emergency care (secondary outcomes).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2025
Typical duration for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 3, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2027
January 24, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.3 years
May 16, 2024
January 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time to admission to a long-term care homes
Data will come from provincial continuing care registries, which document the start date of any publicly funded continuing care service a person receives, the end date of this service, and the type of service. The outcome will be the time between a person's first RAI-HC assessment and admission to a long-term care home (i.e., an assisted living home or nursing home).
From date of home care admission until the date of admission to a long-term care home or loss to follow up (i.e., death, move out of province), whichever came first, assessed up to 12 years (between Jan 31, 2012 and Dec 31, 2024)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Symptoms of depression
Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first
Presence or absence of physical decline
Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first
Presence or absence of cognitive decline
Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first
Emergency room registrations
Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first
Hospital stays
Baseline (date of home care admission) and annually until study end (Dec 31, 2024) or loss to follow up, whichever came first
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Day program attendees
Older adults (65+ years) attending an adult day program in Alberta, British Columbia, or Manitoba
Non-attendees
Older adults with an initial Resident Assessment Instrument - Home Care (RAI-HC), who are not attending a day program in Alberta, British Columbia, or Manitoba
Interventions
Day program use patterns will be determined, using Latent Class Analysis. Three continuous variables will be categorized as low, low-moderate, high-moderate, high, using sample distribution quartiles: (1) Time between first RAI-HC assessment and first attendance of a day program, (2) average number of hours of day program attendance (i.e., total number of hours spent in a day program divided by the number of times attended), and (3) total number of days a person attended a day program.
Any publicly funded continuing care services in the community, other than adult day programming (e.g., home care, in-home respite). Community care participants will be propensity score matched with day program participants, using RAI-HC variables on day program eligibility (to ensure similarity of non-attendees to day program attendees). Matching variables will include: physical functioning, cognition, behavioural symptoms, bladder/bowel continence, availability of a caregiver, and caregiver distress. The investigators will also include variables on health and social characteristics (e.g., age, sex, type/duration of publicly funded community care received before the matching index date, deprivation indices).
Eligibility Criteria
The study focuses on community care systems in Alberta, British Columbia, and Manitoba, all of which assess day program eligibility using comparable processes, criteria, and assessments (i.e. RAI-HC). The yearly average number of completed RAI-HC assessments is \~20,000-30,000 in Alberta, \~34,000-39,000 in British Columbia, and \~10,000 in Manitoba. The estimated number of day program attendees is \>20,000/year (\>200,000 within the study period), each with multiple assessments.
You may qualify if:
- Persons aged 65 years and over
- Initial RAI-HC assessment completed
- Attendance of an adult day program (for cohort 1)
- Receipt of any community-based continuing care services, other than adult day program (cohort 2)
You may not qualify if:
- \- No receipt of any community-based continuing care service
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- York Universitylead
- Carswell Family Foundationcollaborator
- Alzheimer Society of York Regioncollaborator
Related Publications (26)
European Commission. The 2018 ageing report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU member states (2016-2070). Luxembourg: European Commission; 2018. Report No.: 79. Available from: https://economy-finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/2018-ageing-report-economic-and-budgetary-projections-eu-member-states-2016-2070_en#files [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDFederal/provincial/territorial ministers responsible for seniors. Core community supports to age in community. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2019. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/corporate/seniors/forum/core-community-supports.html [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDMacDonald B-J, Wolfson M, Hirdes JP. The future co$t of long-term care in Canada. Toronto, ON: National Institute on Aging; 2019. Available from: https://www.nia-ryerson.ca/reports [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDThomas KS, Applebaum R. Long-term services and supports (LTSS): A growing challenge for an aging America. Public Policy & Aging Report 2015;25(2):56-62. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prv003
BACKGROUNDWhitman DB. Unsolved mysteries in aging policy. Public Policy & Aging Report 2015;25(2):67-73. doi: 10.1093/ppar/prv006
BACKGROUND2022 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789. doi: 10.1002/alz.12638. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
PMID: 35289055BACKGROUNDPrince MJ, Wimo A, Guerchet MM, Ali GC, Wu Y-T, Prina M. World Alzheimer Report 2015 - The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. London: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2015. Available from: https://www.alzint.org/resource/world-alzheimer-report-2015/ [accessed Sep 2, 2022
BACKGROUNDPublic Health Agency of Canada. Dementia in Canada. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada; Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/publications/diseases-conditions/dementia.html [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDNguyen H, Manolova G, Daskalopoulou C, Vitoratou S, Prince M, Prina AM. Prevalence of multimorbidity in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Comorb. 2019 Aug 22;9:2235042X19870934. doi: 10.1177/2235042X19870934. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
PMID: 31489279BACKGROUNDThe Academy of Medical Sciences. Multimorbidity: a priority for global health research. London: The Academy of Medical Sciences; 2018. Available from: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/policy/policy-projects/multimorbidity [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDCanadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Quick stats - Home Care Reporting System (HCRS) profile of clients in home care 2020-2021. Available from: https://www.cihi.ca/en/quick-stats [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDMorgan T, Ann Williams L, Trussardi G, Gott M. Gender and family caregiving at the end-of-life in the context of old age: A systematic review. Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;30(7):616-24. doi: 10.1177/0269216315625857. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
PMID: 26814213BACKGROUNDQuesnel-Vallée A, Willson A, Reiter-Campeau S. Health inequalities among older adults in developed countries: Reconciling theories and policy approaches. In: George L, Ferraro K, editors. Handbook of aging - social sciences 8th ed. London: Elsevier; 2016.
BACKGROUNDQuesnel-Vallée A, Farrah J-S, Jenkins T. Population aging, health systems, and equity: Shared challenges for the United States and Canada. In: Settersten Jr. RA, Angel JL, editors. Handbook of sociology of aging New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer; 2011.
BACKGROUNDMcGrail K. Long-term care as part of the continuum. Healthc Pap. 2011;10(4):39-43; discussion 58-62. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2011.22190.
PMID: 21593615BACKGROUNDSinha S, Dunning J, Wong I, Nicin M, Nauth S. Enabling the future provision of long-term care in Canada. Toronto, ON: National Institute on Aging; 2019. Available from: https://www.nia-ryerson.ca/reports [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDFederal/provincial/territorial ministers responsible for seniors. Report on housing needs of seniors. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2019. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/employment-social-development/corporate/seniors/forum/report-seniors-housing-needs.html [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDSpasova S, Baeten R, Coster S, Ghailani D, Peña-Casas R, Vanhercke art. Challenges in long-term care in Europe - A study of national policies 2018. Brussels: European Commission; 2018. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=1135&newsId=9185&furtherNews=yes [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDGoncalves J, Weaver F, Konetzka RT. Measuring State Medicaid Home Care Participation and Intensity Using Latent Variables. J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jul;39(7):731-744. doi: 10.1177/0733464818786396. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
PMID: 29978735BACKGROUNDWysocki A, Butler M, Kane RL, Kane RA, Shippee T, Sainfort F. Long-Term Services and Supports for Older Adults: A Review of Home and Community-Based Services Versus Institutional Care. J Aging Soc Policy. 2015;27(3):255-79. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2015.1024545.
PMID: 25942005BACKGROUNDRoyal Bank of Canada. 2013 RBC retirement myths & realities poll: most appealing living arrangements for boomers. 2013. Available from: http://www.rbc.com/newsroom/news/2013/20131024-myths-realities.html [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDAmerican Association of Retired Persons (AARP). 2018 home and community preferences: A national survey of adults age 18-plus. Washington, DC: AARP Research; 2018. Available from: https://www.aarp.org/research/topics/community/info-2018/2018-home-community-preference.html [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDEuropean Commission. Health and long-term care in the European Union. Luxembourg: European Commission; 2007. Available from: https://sid-inico.usal.es/idocs/F8/FDO22761/health_european_union.pdf [accessed Sep 2, 2022]
BACKGROUNDGutman GM, Milstein S, Killam J, Lewis D, Hollander MJ. Adult Day Care centres in British Columbia: models, characteristics and services. Health Rep. 1993;5(2):189-207. English, French.
PMID: 8292758BACKGROUNDGutman GM, Milstein S, Killam J, Lewis D, Hollander MJ. Adult day care centres in British Columbia: client characteristics, reasons for referral and reasons for non-attendance. Health Rep. 1993;5(3):321-33. English, French.
PMID: 8199334BACKGROUNDHoben M, Maxwell CJ, Ubell A, Doupe MB, Goodarzi Z, Allana S, Beleno R, Berta W, Bethell J, Daly T, Ginsburg L, Rahman AS, Nguyen H, Tate K, McGrail K. EXploring Patterns of Use and Effects of Adult Day Programs to Improve Trajectories of Continuing Care (EXPEDITE): Protocol for a Retrospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 30;13:e60896. doi: 10.2196/60896.
PMID: 39213024DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthias Hoben, PhD
York University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Helen Carswell Chair in Dementia Care
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2024
First Posted
June 3, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2027
Last Updated
January 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The health administrative data used in this study are owned by the respective provincial health authorities. Provincial data policies do not allow public sharing of these data. The research team will work with an in-house health system data analyst in each of the provinces to carry out the analyses. Data are required to stay within the respective province and within the province's protected and secure data repository.