Comparison Between Propess and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming
Comparison Between Propess (Dinoprostone Controlled Release Pessary) and Cook Double-balloon Catheter for Cervical Priming: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators aimed to compare efficacy and safety of Propess versus Cooks double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening with an unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Jun 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 26, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJuly 24, 2024
May 1, 2024
1 year
May 26, 2024
July 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Priming to delivery interval
Time for priming (device placement) to delivery interval
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Vaginal delivery within 24 hours after priming
1 year
Caesarean section rate
1 year
Vaginal delivery rate
1 year
Priming to induction interval
1 year
Need of induction with oxytocin
1 year
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cook double-balloon catheter
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipant is placed in lithotomy position, then to clean vulval and vaginal area, followed by inserting vaginal speculum. Cook double-balloon catheter will be inserted under standard technique. Doctor or midwife guide the cervical ripening balloon with stylet to pass through the cervix. Uterine balloon should be place above level of internal os, then to remove the stylet before further advancing the catheter. Cook double-balloon catheter is further advancing through the cervix until both balloons entered cervical canal. Uterine and vaginal balloons are both inflated with up to 80ml normal saline according to manufacturer recommendation. Maximal duration of balloon placement will be 12 hours. If cervix remains unfavorable after Cook double-catheter balloons, she will be given another Cook double-catheter balloons priming the next day. If cervix remains unfavourable after two balloon priming, elective Caesarean section will be advised.
Propess
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipant will be firstly confirmed reactive tracing and without regular contraction by non-stress test for 20mins. Propess will be checked its integrity and applied with lubricating jelly before insertion. Propess is inserted to the posterior vaginal fornix. Woman should inform medical staff if they have leaking sensation. After insertion, woman will be advised to lie down and perform non-stress test for 2 hours. Propess will be removed after 24 hours post insertion. Cervical assessment is performed the next day after removal of Propess. Patient with favourable cervix, i.e. Bishop score \>= 7, will start artificial rupture of membrane and syntocinon infusion. Patient with unfavorable cervix, i.e. Bishop score \<7 is arranged another day of priming by PGE2. If the cervix remains unfavorable after 2 days of pharmacological priming, women will be given a rest day or continued priming by Cook double-balloon catheter.
Interventions
To compare whether Cook double-balloon catheter or Propess able to achieve vaginal delivery with a shorter priming to delivery interval
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Viable singleton pregnancy
- Cephalic presentation
- Bishop score \<7
- At term (\>=37+0 weeks of gestation)
- Nulliparous women
You may not qualify if:
- Gestation \<37weeks
- Multiple pregnancy
- Bishop score \<7
- Malpresentation
- Contraindication to vaginal delivery
- Previous Caesarean section
- History of myomectomy
- Maternal fever
- Suspected infection
- Abnormal fetal heart-rate patterns
- Rupture of membranes
- Intrauterine growth restriction
- Not fit for giving consent
- Allergic to Propess or PGE2
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yin Fong Leung, MBBS
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2024
First Posted
May 31, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
July 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share