NCT06437262

Brief Summary

The objective of this project was to compare the immediate antimicrobial effect and in situ substantivity of a new 0.20% chlorhexidine (CHX) gel and cymenol with the current CHX gel formulation on dental plaque biofilm and salivary flora up to 7 hours after a single application.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_1 healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Longer than P75 for phase_1 healthy

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2023

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 25, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

May 25, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 25, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (15)

  • Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 5 minutes

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 5 minutes

    Baseline, 5 minutes

  • Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 1 hour

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 1 hour

    Baseline, 1 hour

  • Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 3 hours

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 3 hours

    Baseline, 3 hours

  • Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 5 hours

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 5 hours

    Baseline, 5 hours

  • Intragel bacterial viability: baseline vs 7 hours

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: baseline vs 7 hours

    Baseline, 7 hours

  • Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 1 hour

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 1 hour

    5 minutes, 1 hour

  • Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 3 hours

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 3 hours

    5 minutes, 3 hours

  • Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 5 hours

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 5 hours

    5 minutes, 5 hours

  • Intragel bacterial viability: 5 minutes vs 7 hours

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) with either 0.20% CHX gel or 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel: 5 minutes vs 7 hours

    5 minutes, 7 hours

  • Intergel bacterial viability at baseline: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) at baseline: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.

    Baseline

  • Intergel bacterial viability after 5 min: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 5 minutes: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.

    5 minutes

  • Intergel bacterial viability after 1 hour: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 1 hour: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.

    1 hour

  • Intergel bacterial viability after 3 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 3 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.

    3 hours

  • Intergel bacterial viability after 5 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 5 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.

    5 hours

  • Intergel bacterial viability after 7 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel

    Percentage of bacterial viability (Ratio of viable bacteria to total bacteria -viable + non-viable- multiplied by 100) after 7 hours: 0.20% CHX gel vs 0.20% CHX and cymenol gel.

    7 hours

Study Arms (2)

0.20% CHX gel

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants underwent a single application of the 0.20% CHX gel. Samples were collected in basal conditions (i.e., before application) and at 5 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 5 hours and 7 hours after application.

Drug: 0.20% CHX gel on salivaDrug: 0.20% CHX gel on oral biofilm

0.20% CHX and Cymenol gel

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants underwent a single application of the 0.20% CHX + Cymenol gel. Samples were collected in basal conditions (i.e., before application) and at 5 minutes, 1 hour, 3 hours, 5 hours and 7 hours after application.

Drug: 0.20% CHX and Cymenol gel on salivaDrug: 0.20% CHX and Cymenol gel on oral biofilm

Interventions

In vivo application of a gel on the vestibular and palatal/lingual gingival mucosa of both arches at minute 0 for posterior saliva collection at different time-points.

0.20% CHX gel

In vivo application of a gel on the vestibular and palatal/lingual gingival mucosa of both arches at minute 0 for posterior saliva collection at different time-points.

0.20% CHX and Cymenol gel

Ex vivo application of a gel on the glass disks of the removable intraoral appliance at minute 0 for subsequent one-by-one disk removal from the device at different time-points.

0.20% CHX gel

Ex vivo application of a gel on the glass disks of the removable intraoral appliance at minute 0 for subsequent one-by-one disk removal from the device at different time-points.

0.20% CHX and Cymenol gel

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Systemically healthy volunteers
  • Age between 20-45 years
  • Presence of minimum 24 permanent teeth
  • No evidence of gingivitis or periodontitis (CPITN= 0)
  • No presence of untreated caries at the start of the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Smoker or ex-smoker
  • Presence of dental protheses or orthodontic appliances
  • Antibiotic treatment and/or routine use of oral antiseptics in the previous three months
  • Presence of any systemic disease that could alter saliva production or composition

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Santiago de Compostela

Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, 15782, Spain

Location

Study Officials

  • Inmaculada Tomás, Prof

    University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2024

First Posted

May 31, 2024

Study Start

September 1, 2022

Primary Completion

June 30, 2023

Study Completion

July 31, 2023

Last Updated

July 29, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations