Cancer Prevention Among Individuals with Mental Ill-health: Patient Navigation for Primary Cancer Prevention
CO-CAPTAIN
1 other identifier
interventional
1,240
4 countries
9
Brief Summary
Prevention is essential for reducing cancer-related mortality. However, people with mental ill-health often face difficulties in accessing cancer prevention services. The EU-funded CO-CAPTAIN project aims to co-adapt and implement the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in this underserved population. This evidence-based and patient-centred intervention aims to support patient empowerment through removal of systemic barriers, provide social support and promote timely access to primary prevention services.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer
Started Jun 2024
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedFebruary 19, 2025
May 1, 2024
1.2 years
March 28, 2024
February 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (26)
Health data of participants as assessed by self-report or electronic health reports
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in health outcomes and socio-economic risk factors in the course of study participation. Next to socio-demographic data, participants will indicate their health status, alcohol consumption, sexual risk behavior, sun exposure, and vaccination status by self-report or electronic health reports.
18 months
Nutritional intake of participants as assessed by the Rapid Prime Diet Quality Score Screener (rPDQS)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome nutritional intake. Nutritional intake will be assessed by the Rapid Prime Diet Quality Score Screener (rPDQS; range: 0-52, where higher values indicate healthier nutritional intake).
18 months
Smoking behavior of participants as assessed by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FND)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome smoking behavior. Smoking behavior will be assessed by the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FND; range: 0-10, where higher values indicate higher nicotine dependence).
18 months
Physical activity of participants as assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome physical activity. Physical activity will be assessed by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; range: 0-19278 MET minutes per week, where higher values indicate more time spent on physical activity).
18 months
Depressive symptoms of participants as assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome depressive symptoms. Depressive symptoms will be assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; range: 0-27, where a higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms).
18 months
Generalized anxiety of participants as assessed by the 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome generalized anxiety. Generalized anxiety will be assessed by the 7-item anxiety scale (GAD-7; range: 0-21, where higher values indicate more severe anxiety symptoms).
18 months
Health-related anxiety of participants as assessed by the Whiteley Index (Whiteley-6-R)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the health outcome health-related anxiety. Health-related anxiety will be assessed by items from the Whiteley Index (Whiteley-6-R; range: 0-24, where higher values indicate more health anxiety symptoms).
18 months
(Health-related) Quality of life of participants as assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHO-QOL-BREF)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in (health-related) quality of life. (Health-related) Quality of life will be assessed by items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHO-QOL-BREF; range: 4-20, where higher values indicate higher quality of life).
18 months
(Health-related) Quality of life of participants as assessed by the descriptive system of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in (health-related) quality of life. (Health-related) Quality of life will be assessed by items from the descriptive system of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L, where each dimension has a range from 1-5, where a higher value indicates more severe problems).
18 months
(Health-related) Quality of life of participants as assessed by the EQ visual analogue scale of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in (health-related) quality of life. (Health-related) Quality of life will be assessed by items from the EQ visual analogue scale of the EuroQol - 5 Dimensions - 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L, range: 0-100, where higher values indicate better subjective health).
18 months
Self-efficacy of participants as assessed by the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in self-efficacy. Self-efficacy will be assessed by items from the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES; range: 10-40, where higher values indicate higher perceived self-efficacy).
18 months
Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers (HPS) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers (HPS) as part of health literacy. HPS as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the HPS scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived HPS).
18 months
Having sufficient information to manage one's own health as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Having sufficient information to manage my health (HSI) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in having sufficient information to manage one's own health as part of health literacy. Having sufficient information to manage my health (HSI) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the HSI scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived HSI).
18 months
Actively managing one's own health as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Actively managing my health (AMH) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in actively managing one's own health as part of health literacy. Actively managing my health (AMH) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the AMH scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived AMH).
18 months
Social support as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Social support of health scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in social support as part of health literacy. Social support as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the social support of health scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived social support for health).
18 months
Appraisal of health information as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Appraisal of health information (CA) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in appraisal of health information as part of health literacy. Appraisal of health information (CA) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the CA scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-4, where higher values indicate higher perceived CA).
18 months
Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (AE) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to actively engage with healthcare providers as part of health literacy. Ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (AE) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the AE scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived AE).
18 months
Navigating the healthcare system as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Navigating the healthcare system (NHS) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to navigate the healthcare system as part of health literacy. Navigating the healthcare system (NHS) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the NHS scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived NHS).
18 months
Ability to find good health information as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Ability to find good health information (FHI) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to find good health information as part of health literacy. Ability to find good health information (FHI) as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the FHI scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived FHI).
18 months
Understand health information well enough to know what to do as part of health literacy of participants as assessed by the Understand health information well enough to know what to do (UHI) scale of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in the ability to understand health information well enough to know what to do as part of health literacy. Understanding health information well enough to know what to do as part of health literacy will be assessed by items of the Understand health information well enough to know what to do (UHI) scale from the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher values indicate higher perceived UHI).
18 months
Use of healthcare services of participants as assessed by self-reports
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in use of healthcare services. Use of healthcare services will be assessed by self-reports.
18 months
Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health as assessed by an economic evaluation
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by evaluating cost-effectiveness and cost-utility. To assess cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, an economic evaluation will be carried out by analyzing health outcomes and costs (healthcare costs, cancer costs, burden).
18 months
Satisfaction with care of participants as assessed by self-reports and items from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in satisfaction with care. Satisfaction with care will be assessed by self-reports and items from the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18, range of the mean score: 1-5, where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction with medical care).
18 months
Discrimination experiences of participants as assessed by self-reports
To evaluate the clinical utility/effectiveness of the Patient Navigation Model for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health, the extent to which people with mental ill-health benefitted from the intervention will be assessed by investigating changes in discrimination experiences. Discrimination experiences will be assessed by self-reports.
18 months
Facilitators of the Patient Navigation Model as experienced by participants and assessed by qualitative semi-structured interviews
The co-adapted Patient Navigation Model will be evaluated by assessing facilitators of the intervention to determine its effectiveness. Experiences of people with mental ill-health, navigators, and healthcare professionals involved in care of people with mental ill-health will be considered. Qualitative data will be gathered using semi-structured interviews.
18 months
Barriers of the Patient Navigation Model as experienced by participants and assessed by qualitative semi-structured interviews
The co-adapted Patient Navigation Model will be evaluated by assessing barriers of the intervention to determine its effectiveness. Experiences of people with mental ill-health, navigators, and healthcare professionals involved in care of people with mental ill-health will be considered. Qualitative data will be gathered using semi-structured interviews.
18 months
Study Arms (1)
People with mental ill-health
OTHERAll people with mental ill-health aged 18 or older who visit one of the recruitment sites will be asked to participate. Further participants will be recruited through partner organizations (non-governmental organisations, patient groups and professional organisations) involved in care for individuals with mental ill-health, as well as personal contacts. Additionally, healthcare professionals involved in care of people with mental ill-health will be asked to participate in the qualitative part of the study.
Interventions
CO-CAPTAIN focuses on co-designing and piloting and evaluating the implementation of patient navigation (PN) for primary cancer prevention in people with mental ill-health. Patient Navigators, trained professionals with experience working with people with mental ill-health, will assist people with mental ill-health in gaining access to and utilizing appropriate primary cancer prevention measures offered within the respective healthcare and social system (including smoking cessation and physical activity and nutritional interventions). For this purpose, Patient Navigators will offer regular appointment with participants, apply motivational interviewing and aid in accessing appropriate materials while aiming at empowering participants in taking an active role and making better and more informed decisions regarding their health.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- Individuals who have been diagnosed with one or more mental disorders OR healthcare professionals involved in care of individuals with mental ill-health
- Sufficient knowledge of language
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals unable to give consent due to diminished capacity
- Individuals who do not provide consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Medical University of Viennalead
- Senior Europa Sociedad Limitadacollaborator
- Prolepsis Institute for Preventive, Environmental and Occupational Medicinecollaborator
- Universitat Politècnica de Valènciacollaborator
- STICHTING INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR INTEGRATED CAREcollaborator
- Medical University of Lodzcollaborator
- Consejería de Familia, Juventud y Política Social, Comunidad de Madridcollaborator
- Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spaincollaborator
- Fundacion para la Investigacion e Innovacion Biosanitaria de Atencion Primariacollaborator
- Mental Health Europe - Sante Mentale Europecollaborator
- University Mental Health Research Institute, Athens, Greececollaborator
- Fundacion para el Fomento en Asturias de la Investigacion Cientifica Aplicada y Tecnologiacollaborator
- Consejeria de Salud - Principado de Asturiascollaborator
- Servicio de Salud del Principado de Asturiascollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Hietzing Hospital
Vienna, Austria
LOGIN - Verein zur Gesundheitsförderung und sozialen Integration
Vienna, Austria
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, Austria
Mental Health Clinic
Athens, Greece
The Day Hospital
Athens, Greece
The Guest House / Protected apartments
Athens, Greece
The Association of Youth and People with Mental Problems, Their Families and Friends POMOST
Lodz, Poland
General Directorate of Social Services, council of family, youth and social affairs, community of Madrid (DGSSI-CM)
Madrid, Spain
Servicio Madrileño de Salud (SERMAS)
Madrid, Spain
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Igor Grabovac, MD, PhD
Medical University of Vienna
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Project coordinator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2024
First Posted
May 30, 2024
Study Start
June 24, 2024
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
February 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Accessibility is expected after completion of the study as well as of related publications. Only data that does not allow identification of participants will be made available.
- Access Criteria
- Upon request
Upon request from other researchers, the principal investigator may provide study materials and data in an anonymised and limited form, while adhering to the Data Security Department of the Medical University of Vienna.