Evaluation of Visual Training System in Patients With Glaucoma
Assessing the Effectiveness of Visual Perception Training Based on Lateral Masking Paradigm in Glaucoma Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study intends to conduct visual function examinations and follow-ups on two groups of glaucoma patients, one receiving visual perceptual training and the other serving as a control without training. The aim of this study is to explore the effects of visual perceptual training based on the lateral masking paradigm on patients' visual function. Additionally, synchronized EEG-fNIRS signals will be collected to investigate whether changes in patients' visual function are accompanied by corresponding alterations in brain function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedMay 29, 2024
February 1, 2024
11 months
May 22, 2024
May 22, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Contrast sensitivity function
Contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was assessed using the qCSF method at baseline, and at 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months after the intervention. The qCSF method employed a Bayesian adaptive learning procedure. Data collected for analysis included contrast sensitivity at 19 spatial frequencies, the area under the log CSF (AULCSF), and the cutoff spatial frequency.
6 months after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Visual field
6 months after intervention
Visual acuity
6 months after intervention
Stereoacuity
6 months after intervention
Glaucoma Visual Functioning Questionnaire-40 (GVFQ-40)
6 months after intervention
National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25)
6 months after intervention
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
the training group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group received visual perceptual training based on the lateral masking paradigm every other day for 35 to 45 minutes, with each cycle consisting of 40 sessions, lasting approximately 3 months. The training began in the hospital during the first week and continued at home using personal computers thereafter. The personal computers were connected to a central server via the internet.
the control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group maintained the original treatment plan without any additional interventions.
Interventions
Visual perceptual training is a novel rehabilitation approach aimed at enhancing visual performance through practice of visual tasks. Patients received visual perceptual training based on the lateral masking paradigm every other day. Each training session consisted of 9 stages, totaling 900 trials, lasting 35 to 45 minutes. The stimuli consisted of a central Gabor patch with relatively low contrast positioned in the central fixation area, along with co-linear high-contrast Gabor patches distributed above and below the central stimulus. These stimuli were presented on a Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) monitor, with a training distance of 150 cm.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥ 10 years old
- diagnosed with primary glaucoma or developmental glaucoma
- the best corrected visual acuity ≥0.1 and the mean deviation of the visual field worse or equal to -6 dB
- visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and other eye conditions have been stable for more than 3 months
- participants capable of understanding the purpose of the study and providing informed consent
- participants capable of cooperating with relevant examinations.
You may not qualify if:
- a history of eye surgery or eye laser within three months
- complicated with other ophthalmopathy affecting visual function (except cataract, ametropia), such as age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, optic nerve disease, retinal vascular disease, etc.
- serious systemic diseases, such as neurological diseases, cardiovascular diseases, psychological diseases, malignant tumors, etc
- pregnant or lactating women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zhongshan Opthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Related Publications (5)
Foster PJ, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in China: how big is the problem? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Nov;85(11):1277-82. doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1277.
PMID: 11673287BACKGROUNDFontenot JL, Bona MD, Kaleem MA, McLaughlin WM Jr, Morse AR, Schwartz TL, Shepherd JD, Jackson ML; American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Vision Rehabilitation Committee. Vision Rehabilitation Preferred Practice Pattern(R). Ophthalmology. 2018 Jan;125(1):P228-P278. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.09.030. Epub 2017 Nov 4. No abstract available.
PMID: 29108747BACKGROUNDMatteo BM, Vigano B, Cerri CG, Perin C. Visual field restorative rehabilitation after brain injury. J Vis. 2016 Jul 1;16(9):11. doi: 10.1167/16.9.11.
PMID: 27472498BACKGROUNDPolat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D. Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27;101(17):6692-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401200101. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
PMID: 15096608BACKGROUNDZhong J, Wang W, Li J, Wang Y, Hu X, Feng L, Ye Q, Luo Y, Zhu Z, Li J, Yuan J. Effects of Perceptual Learning on Deprivation Amblyopia in Children with Limbal Dermoid: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 28;11(7):1879. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071879.
PMID: 35407483BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The technical staff and research assistants involved in subject enrollment, outcome measurement, and data collection are blinded to the intervention allocation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 22, 2024
First Posted
May 29, 2024
Study Start
June 3, 2024
Primary Completion
April 26, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
May 29, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share