NCT06425874

Brief Summary

Breast-conserving surgery is the standard treatment for young breast cancer patients, while mastectomy with breast reconstruction is an alternative for those who are not eligible for Breast-conserving surgery. Several studies have compared the quality of life and patient satisfaction among individuals receiving different types of surgery (Breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction). For example, Meghan R. demonstrated that patients undergoing Breast-conserving surgery experience a higher quality of life compared to those undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction, whereas J. Dauplat's study showed that patients who undergo mastectomy with breast reconstruction report a higher quality of life than those who undergo mastectomy alone. However, the investigators hypothesize that the advantages of a specific type of surgery over another, such as Breast-conserving surgery versus breast reconstruction, may vary among patients with different socioeconomic factors. For instance, the benefits of breast reconstruction over Breast-conserving surgery might be more pronounced in young patients who require a more socially active lifestyle. Additionally, the benefits of one type of surgery over another may also vary at different time points during post-operative follow-up. Furthermore, it is worth noting that most current studies have been conducted in Caucasian populations. In contrast to Caucasians, Asians typically have smaller breast volumes, potentially leading to more significant defects after Breast-conserving surgery and possibly poorer aesthetic outcomes. Therefore, a study focusing on Asian young breast cancer populations is necessary.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
116mo left

Started Feb 2024

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress19%
Feb 2024Dec 2035

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 29, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 29, 2024

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2024

Completed
11.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2035

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2035

Last Updated

May 22, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

11.8 years

First QC Date

April 29, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 21, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Participant's breast satisfaction assessed by BREAST-Q questionnaire version 2.0

    Utilizing the BREAST-Q questionnaire, this measure assesses women's self-reported satisfaction with their breasts and associated quality of life, encompassing psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores indicating a more favorable outcome.Assessment is conducted preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively.

    Pre-operation and 10 years

  • Participant's health-related quality of life assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Assessed through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), this self-administered questionnaire consists of 30 items designed to evaluate the health-related quality of life among cancer patients. For questions 1 to 28, a 4-point scale is used, ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"), with lower scores indicating a more positive outcome. Questions 29 and 30 employ a 7-point scale, with scores ranging from 1 ("Very poor") to 7 ("Excellent"), where higher scores signify a better outcome.Assessment is conducted 10 years postoperatively.

    10 years

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Participant's decisional conflict assessed by Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire

    Pre-Operative

  • Participant's decision regret assessed by Decision Regret Scale questionnaire

    10 years

  • Participant's anxiety and depression assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire

    Pre-operation and 10 years

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Influence of Socioeconomic, Psychological, and Clinicopathological Factors on Outcomes

    Pre-operation and 10 years

Study Arms (3)

Breast-conserving surgery

Procedure: Breast-conserving surgery

Mastectomy

Procedure: Mastectomy

Mastectomy with reconstruction

Procedure: Mastectomy with reconstruction

Interventions

Breast-conserving surgery

Breast-conserving surgery
MastectomyPROCEDURE

Mastectomy without reconstruction

Mastectomy

Any type of reconstruction(include implant and autologous)

Mastectomy with reconstruction

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 50 Years
Sexfemale
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Young breast cancer women.

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 50 years old.
  • The surgery time and procedure have been confirmed, and the surgical informed consent and research informed consent forms have been signed.
  • Informed consent obtained from patient.
  • Unilateral Breast Cancer.
  • Good health,the patient is able to tolerate general anesthesia and surgery, with an ECOG performance status of ≤2 points.
  • No history of breast/axillary radiation therapy.
  • Willing and capable of complying with the study protocol visits, treatment plans, and other research procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Bilateral breast cancer.
  • Inflammatory breast cancer.
  • Stage IV breast cancer.
  • Physical examination and imaging suggest tumor infiltration into the skin, pectoralis major muscle, and other adjacent tissues.
  • Patients unable to tolerate surgery due to coagulation abnormalities.
  • In patients without evidence of breast cancer in the contralateral breast, requesting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
  • In patients who have undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer (including mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, and mastectomy with implant reconstruction), requesting secondary breast surgery.
  • Patients with a history or current diagnosis of other malignancies, excluding thyroid cancer.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Dominici L, Hu J, Zheng Y, Kim HJ, King TA, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Wong JS, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Association of Local Therapy With Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Young Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):e213758. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3758. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

    PMID: 34468718BACKGROUND
  • Hanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, DeSnyder SM, Caudle AS, Shaitelman SF, Hoffman KE, Smith GL, Jagsi R, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Long-term Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy and Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):e220631. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

    PMID: 35416926BACKGROUND
  • Diao K, Lei X, He W, Jagsi R, Giordano SH, Smith GL, Caudle A, Shen Y, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Patient-reported Quality of Life After Breast-conserving Surgery With Radiotherapy Versus Mastectomy and Reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e1096-e1102. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005920. Epub 2023 May 26.

    PMID: 37232937BACKGROUND
  • Rosenberg SM, Dominici LS, Gelber S, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Wong JS, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Peppercorn JM, Borges VF, Partridge AH. Association of Breast Cancer Surgery With Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being in Young Breast Cancer Survivors. JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov 1;155(11):1035-1042. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3325.

    PMID: 32936216BACKGROUND
  • Riba LA, Gruner RA, Alapati A, James TA. Association between socioeconomic factors and outcomes in breast cancer. Breast J. 2019 May;25(3):488-492. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13250. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

    PMID: 30983100BACKGROUND
  • Flanagan MR, Zabor EC, Romanoff A, Fuzesi S, Stempel M, Mehrara BJ, Morrow M, Pusic AL, Gemignani ML. A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3133-3140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07548-9. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

    PMID: 31342397BACKGROUND
  • Dauplat J, Kwiatkowski F, Rouanet P, Delay E, Clough K, Verhaeghe JL, Raoust I, Houvenaeghel G, Lemasurier P, Thivat E, Pomel C; STIC-RMI working group. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1197-1206. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10537. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

    PMID: 28401542BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Interventions

Mastectomy, SegmentalMastectomyPlastic Surgery Procedures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsBreast DiseasesSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Surgical Procedures, Operative

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2024

First Posted

May 22, 2024

Study Start

February 29, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2035

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2035

Last Updated

May 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The study protocol and the raw and clean data for analysis will be shared among the participated researchers. Non-researchers could obtain relevant informations from the researchers upon reasonable requests.

Locations