The Impact of Socioeconomic Determinants on the Patient Reported Outcomes in Young Breast Cancer Patients After Breast Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast-conserving surgery is the standard treatment for young breast cancer patients, while mastectomy with breast reconstruction is an alternative for those who are not eligible for Breast-conserving surgery. Several studies have compared the quality of life and patient satisfaction among individuals receiving different types of surgery (Breast-conserving surgery, mastectomy alone, or mastectomy with reconstruction). For example, Meghan R. demonstrated that patients undergoing Breast-conserving surgery experience a higher quality of life compared to those undergoing mastectomy with breast reconstruction, whereas J. Dauplat's study showed that patients who undergo mastectomy with breast reconstruction report a higher quality of life than those who undergo mastectomy alone. However, the investigators hypothesize that the advantages of a specific type of surgery over another, such as Breast-conserving surgery versus breast reconstruction, may vary among patients with different socioeconomic factors. For instance, the benefits of breast reconstruction over Breast-conserving surgery might be more pronounced in young patients who require a more socially active lifestyle. Additionally, the benefits of one type of surgery over another may also vary at different time points during post-operative follow-up. Furthermore, it is worth noting that most current studies have been conducted in Caucasian populations. In contrast to Caucasians, Asians typically have smaller breast volumes, potentially leading to more significant defects after Breast-conserving surgery and possibly poorer aesthetic outcomes. Therefore, a study focusing on Asian young breast cancer populations is necessary.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2035
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2035
May 22, 2024
May 1, 2024
11.8 years
April 29, 2024
May 21, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Participant's breast satisfaction assessed by BREAST-Q questionnaire version 2.0
Utilizing the BREAST-Q questionnaire, this measure assesses women's self-reported satisfaction with their breasts and associated quality of life, encompassing psychosocial, sexual, and physical well-being. Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best), with higher scores indicating a more favorable outcome.Assessment is conducted preoperatively and 10 years postoperatively.
Pre-operation and 10 years
Participant's health-related quality of life assessed by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Assessed through the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), this self-administered questionnaire consists of 30 items designed to evaluate the health-related quality of life among cancer patients. For questions 1 to 28, a 4-point scale is used, ranging from 1 ("Not at all") to 4 ("Very much"), with lower scores indicating a more positive outcome. Questions 29 and 30 employ a 7-point scale, with scores ranging from 1 ("Very poor") to 7 ("Excellent"), where higher scores signify a better outcome.Assessment is conducted 10 years postoperatively.
10 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Participant's decisional conflict assessed by Decisional Conflict Scale questionnaire
Pre-Operative
Participant's decision regret assessed by Decision Regret Scale questionnaire
10 years
Participant's anxiety and depression assessed by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire
Pre-operation and 10 years
Other Outcomes (1)
Influence of Socioeconomic, Psychological, and Clinicopathological Factors on Outcomes
Pre-operation and 10 years
Study Arms (3)
Breast-conserving surgery
Mastectomy
Mastectomy with reconstruction
Interventions
Any type of reconstruction(include implant and autologous)
Eligibility Criteria
Young breast cancer women.
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 50 years old.
- The surgery time and procedure have been confirmed, and the surgical informed consent and research informed consent forms have been signed.
- Informed consent obtained from patient.
- Unilateral Breast Cancer.
- Good health,the patient is able to tolerate general anesthesia and surgery, with an ECOG performance status of ≤2 points.
- No history of breast/axillary radiation therapy.
- Willing and capable of complying with the study protocol visits, treatment plans, and other research procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral breast cancer.
- Inflammatory breast cancer.
- Stage IV breast cancer.
- Physical examination and imaging suggest tumor infiltration into the skin, pectoralis major muscle, and other adjacent tissues.
- Patients unable to tolerate surgery due to coagulation abnormalities.
- In patients without evidence of breast cancer in the contralateral breast, requesting contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.
- In patients who have undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer (including mastectomy, breast-conserving surgery, and mastectomy with implant reconstruction), requesting secondary breast surgery.
- Patients with a history or current diagnosis of other malignancies, excluding thyroid cancer.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital,Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Related Publications (7)
Dominici L, Hu J, Zheng Y, Kim HJ, King TA, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn J, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Wong JS, Partridge AH, Rosenberg SM. Association of Local Therapy With Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Young Women With Breast Cancer. JAMA Surg. 2021 Oct 1;156(10):e213758. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.3758. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
PMID: 34468718BACKGROUNDHanson SE, Lei X, Roubaud MS, DeSnyder SM, Caudle AS, Shaitelman SF, Hoffman KE, Smith GL, Jagsi R, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Long-term Quality of Life in Patients With Breast Cancer After Breast Conservation vs Mastectomy and Reconstruction. JAMA Surg. 2022 Jun 1;157(6):e220631. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.0631. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
PMID: 35416926BACKGROUNDDiao K, Lei X, He W, Jagsi R, Giordano SH, Smith GL, Caudle A, Shen Y, Peterson SK, Smith BD. Patient-reported Quality of Life After Breast-conserving Surgery With Radiotherapy Versus Mastectomy and Reconstruction. Ann Surg. 2023 Nov 1;278(5):e1096-e1102. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005920. Epub 2023 May 26.
PMID: 37232937BACKGROUNDRosenberg SM, Dominici LS, Gelber S, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ, Wong JS, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Come S, Peppercorn JM, Borges VF, Partridge AH. Association of Breast Cancer Surgery With Quality of Life and Psychosocial Well-being in Young Breast Cancer Survivors. JAMA Surg. 2020 Nov 1;155(11):1035-1042. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.3325.
PMID: 32936216BACKGROUNDRiba LA, Gruner RA, Alapati A, James TA. Association between socioeconomic factors and outcomes in breast cancer. Breast J. 2019 May;25(3):488-492. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13250. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
PMID: 30983100BACKGROUNDFlanagan MR, Zabor EC, Romanoff A, Fuzesi S, Stempel M, Mehrara BJ, Morrow M, Pusic AL, Gemignani ML. A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Mastectomy with Implant Breast Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(10):3133-3140. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07548-9. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
PMID: 31342397BACKGROUNDDauplat J, Kwiatkowski F, Rouanet P, Delay E, Clough K, Verhaeghe JL, Raoust I, Houvenaeghel G, Lemasurier P, Thivat E, Pomel C; STIC-RMI working group. Quality of life after mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Br J Surg. 2017 Aug;104(9):1197-1206. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10537. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
PMID: 28401542BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2024
First Posted
May 22, 2024
Study Start
February 29, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2035
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2035
Last Updated
May 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study protocol and the raw and clean data for analysis will be shared among the participated researchers. Non-researchers could obtain relevant informations from the researchers upon reasonable requests.