A Comparison of Silicone Versus Polyvinylchloride (PVC) Drains Following VATS Lobectomy
The Impact of Chest Drain Type on Pain, Drainage Efficacy and Short Term Outcome Following VATS Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Silicone Versus PVC Drains
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective randomized clinical trial is to compare the impact of the chest tube type on pain, chest drainage efficacy and early postoperative outcome following VATS lobectomy for lung cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- silicone chest drains are less painful compared to standard PVC drains?
- is there any difference in chest drainage efficacy and short term outcome between the two groups? Researchers will compare silicone chest drain group with PVC chest drain group to see if there is any difference in postoperative pain, chest drainage efficacy and short term outcome.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedMay 22, 2024
May 1, 2024
2.9 years
May 8, 2024
May 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Analgesics consumption
Amount of analgesics used first two days after the surgery was analyzed and reported in milligrams. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
2 days
Need for peroral analgesia after the chest tube removal
Need for peroral analgesia at first, second and fourth week after chest tube removal was assessed and reported as frequency in number. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
2 days
Maximal inspiratory pressure
Post-operative pain during the first two days after the surgery was analyzed by measuring the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) in cmH2O. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
2 days
Maximal expiratory pressure
Post-operative pain during the first two days after the surgery was analyzed by measuring the maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) in cmH2O. Higher scores mean a better outcome.
2 days
Visual analogue scale
Post-operative pain during the first two days after the surgery was analyzed by using the visual analogue scale (VAS). Scale tittle was Visual Analogue Scale. Minimum value on a scale was 0 and maximum value was 10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
2 days
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Duration of chest drainage
1 month
Pneumothorax rate on the day of surgery
First day
Pneumothorax rate after chest tube removal
1 month
Pleural effusion rate on the day of surgery
First day
Pleural effusion rate after chest tube removal
1 month
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Silicone (SIL) group
EXPERIMENTALFor postoperative pleural space drainage a silicone coaxial drain of size French 24 (Redax Coaxial Drain, Redax S.p.A., Poggio Rusco Mantova, Italy) was used
PVC group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor postoperative pleural space drainage a standard polyvinyl chloride drain of size French 24 (Argyle, Covidien, Mansfield, USA) was used
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- primary lung cancer eligible for VATS lobectomy by tumor board meeting
You may not qualify if:
- age under 18 years
- high risk of post-operative complications (ASA \> 3, diffusion capacity for transfer factor (TLCO) or forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) ≤ 40%, cycle ergometry with oxygen consumption (VO2 max) \< 15 ml/kg/min)
- tumors growing in parietal pleura
- extended lung resection diffuse
- previous surgery in the same hemithorax
- chronic pain
- chronic use of analgesics or sedatives
- surgical revision
- inability to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Medical Centre Ljubljana
Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia
Related Publications (1)
Greif B, Zgajnar J, Stupnik T. Impact of chest tube type on pain, drainage efficacy, and short-term treatment outcome following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial comparing coaxial silicone drains and standard polyvinyl chloride drains. J Thorac Dis. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):932-943. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-1489. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
PMID: 40083488DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Boris Greif
UMC Ljubljana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Thoracic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2024
First Posted
May 22, 2024
Study Start
September 30, 2020
Primary Completion
August 10, 2023
Study Completion
August 10, 2023
Last Updated
May 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05