Prostate Cancer Awareness and Initiative for Screening in the European Union
PRAISE-U
1 other identifier
observational
20,000
4 countries
5
Brief Summary
PRAISE-U was initiated on the 1st of April 2023 and is set to last for three years. This collaborative effort involves 25 institutions across 12 countries, all driven by a shared objective: to rationalize prostate cancer screening in Europe and enhance patient outcomes. PRAISE-U advocates for EU member states to offer exceptional clinical standards, incorporating cutting-edge personalized approaches to enable timely detection of prostate cancer in individuals who can benefit from early treatment. To assess the functionality, feasibility, and long-term viability of a risk-based algorithm, the consortium will collaborate with pilot sites in Spain, Poland, Ireland, and Lithuania.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2024
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedAugust 15, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.8 years
May 16, 2024
August 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (24)
Incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in each pilot site (with clinically significant prostate cancer defined as ISUP grade group ≥2).
1 year
Invitation coverage
The proportion of eligible individuals from the target population personally invited for screening within a given time frame.
1 year
Examination coverage
The proportion of eligible individuals from the target population who had the recommended screening test within a given time frame
1 year
Participation rate
The proportion of invited individuals who have undergone a screening test within a given time- frame following an active invitation.
1 year
Retention rate
The proportion of eligible individuals re-screened after a negative screening within a specified interval.
1 year
Test result
The results of the screening test.
1 year
PPV of screening test to detect any prostate cancer (6.1) and clinically significant prostate cancers (6.2)
The proportion of individuals who have histopathology confirmed PCa to all those who had positive test results (with PSA result of \>3 ng/ml) (including healthy subjects who were incorrectly diagnosed to have prostate cancer)
1 year
PPV of screening test to detect any prostate cancer (6.1) and clinically significant prostate cancers (6.2)
The proportion of individuals who have histopathologically confirmed clinically significant PCa to all those who had positive test results (with PSA result of \>3 ng/ml) (including healthy subjects who were incorrectly diagnosed as clinically significant PCa).
1 year
False positive rate to detect any PCa (7.1) and clinically significant PCa (7.2)
The proportion of screened individuals who received a positive screening result in which no cancer was detected after workup and diagnostic procedures.
1 year
False positive rate to detect any PCa (7.1) and clinically significant PCa (7.2)
The proportion of screened individuals who received a positive screening result in which no clinically significant cancer was detected after workup and diagnostic procedures.
1 year
Compliance with risk assessment
The proportion of individuals from the screened population undergoing risk assessment (as per protocol of the programme).
1 year
Compliance with further assessment
The proportion of individuals referred for diagnostic work up based on elevated PSA and risk assessment (as per protocol of the programme) attending all workup and diagnostic procedures assigned.
1 year
Detection rate of PCa
The proportion of individuals with a screen positive test who underwent further assessment with histopathologically proven cancer detected \[expressed per 1,000 individuals screened\].
1 year
Compliance with treatment
The proportion of individuals with cancer diagnosed within the screening program referred for treatment who initiated treatment (including active surveillance, when applicable).
1 year
Complications in screening procedure
The proportion of individuals reporting at least one complication incurred during the screening procedure.
1 year
Opportunistic testing
The proportion of individuals screened outside the population-based screening programme.
1 year
Cause-specific mortality
The mortality from prostate cancer (primary cause of death only) per 100,000 target population in a defined 12-month period
1 year
Crude Incidence rate
The number of new cases of PCa arising in a specified population (expressed per 100,000) within a time frame of 12-months.\]
1 year
Interval cancer rate
The proportion of individuals with a negative screening test or a positive screening test but negative further assessment results who were diagnosed with prostate cancer prior to the next screening round.
1 year
Delay time
Time from PSA test sample collection to histopathological confirmation of a malignant diagnosis (further disaggregated by different procedures) to treatment initiation
1 year
Radiologist's assessment of MRI
Radiologist's assessment of MRI
1 year
Compliance with biopsy
Proportion of eligible men who underwent biopsy
1 year
Active surveillance
The proportion of patients recommended AS due to low/low-intermediate risk PCa who accepted and initiated AS.
1 year
Tumour grade distribution
Proportion of prostate cancers detected after positive screening test reported as ISUP grade (group) 1, 2, 3 and 4-5.
1 year
Study Arms (5)
Manresa, Spain
The pilot is run by the Althaia Foundation, driven by the director of primary care.
Region Galicia, Spain
The pilot is run by the Galician Healthcare Service (SERGAS), publicly funded healthcare system of Galicia, Spain.
Ireland
The pilot is run by the Health Service Executive, with University College Dublin as the academic institutional partner, in full support of the National Cancer Control programme (NCCP) and the National Screening Service (NSS) in Ireland
Poland
The pilot is run by the Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Haematology Center. Subdivision of Urology with support from the National Institute of Public Health.
Lithuania
The pilot is run by the National Cancer Institute, where residents of the capital Vilnius region are served.
Interventions
Risk-based screening algorithm
Eligibility Criteria
Healthy men aged 50-69 years old.
You may qualify if:
- Age 50-69 years old.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous diagnosis of prostate cancer.
- Unable to provide written informed consent.
- Had prostate biopsy or MRI within the past six months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- European Association of Urology Research Foundationlead
- Erasmus Medical Centercollaborator
- European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancercollaborator
- Region MidtJylland Denmarkcollaborator
- Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republiccollaborator
- UMC Utrechtcollaborator
- EUROPEAN CANCER ORGANISATIONcollaborator
- Dolnośląskie Centrum Onkologii, Pulmonologii i Hematologiicollaborator
- Narodowy Instytut Zdrowia Publicznegocollaborator
- Conselleria de Sanidade de Galiciacollaborator
- Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresacollaborator
- Vastra Gotaland Regioncollaborator
- Region Skanecollaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- University Ghentcollaborator
- Health Service Executive, Irelandcollaborator
- Estonian Urological Associationcollaborator
- University College Dublincollaborator
- WONCA Europecollaborator
- Movember Foundationcollaborator
- International Agency for Research on Cancercollaborator
- European Society of Urogenital Radiologycollaborator
- Europa UOMOcollaborator
- Czech Urological Societycollaborator
Study Sites (5)
University College Dublin
Dublin, Ireland
National Cancer Institute
Vilnius, Lithuania
Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
Public Health Directorate, SERGAS
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain
Althaia Foundation
Manresa, Spain
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hendrik Van Poppel, Prof
European Association of Urology and KULeuven
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Monique J Roobol, Prof
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Dep of Urology and European Association of Urology
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 16, 2024
First Posted
May 22, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 1, 2026
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual Patient Data data sharing is not foreseen in the informed consent form, however, de-identified patient data will be shared for research purposes.