Changes of Various Structures After Lisfranc Injury Compared to Healthy Individuals.

NCT06420856 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: SBU-FTR-AI-02
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 23
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The effect of muscular strength deficits on postural control after Lisfranc injury has been explained in relation to stance duration and strength. However, the relationship between protective sole sensation and changes in ankle proprioception, balance, ankle mobility and Achilles tendon structural properties has been shown in previous studies. The aim of our study was to determine the possible changes in protective sole sensation, ankle proprioception, balance and functional capacity after Lisfranc injury and to analyse the relationship between these variables.

Conditions

Lisfranc Injury

Keywords

Proprioception; Postural Balance; Foot Injuries

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Difference in plantar sensation in people with Lisfranc injuries compared to healthy people

  Our primary outcome is to determine the difference in plantar sensation changes in people with Lisfranc injuries after treatment compared to healthy volunteers with similar demographic characteristics. According to the monofilament test results, increasing numerical values indicate that proprioception is negatively affected.

  2 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• AOFAS (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society) midfoot Score

  1 months

• FAOS (Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) Score

  1 months

• Modified Star Excursion Test

  1 months

Study Arms (2)

Lisfranc injury patients

Sense of light touch will be used with the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament test, Proprioception evaluation will be used with the Dr.Goniometer application, Muscular strength and endurance will be evaluated with the cybex isokinetic device, Weight-Bearing Lunge test will be used to evaluate ankle mobility and Modified Star Excursion Balance Test will be used to evaluate dynamic balance. Patients' functional levels will be evaluated under two headings: 1. Questionnaire-based functional evaluation: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and foot and ankle functions Rating Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) will be used and will be evaluated. 2. Physical performance evaluation: Heel raise test would be used

Other: Assessment of the musculoskeletal system and its functions

Healthy Volunteers

Sense of light touch will be used with the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament test, Proprioception evaluation will be used with the Dr.Goniometer application, Muscular strength and endurance will be evaluated with the cybex isokinetic device, Weight-Bearing Lunge test will be used to evaluate ankle mobility and Modified Star Excursion Balance Test will be used to evaluate dynamic balance. Patients' functional levels will be evaluated under two headings: 1. Questionnaire-based functional evaluation: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) midfoot score and foot and ankle functions Rating Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) will be used and will be evaluated. 2. Physical performance evaluation: Heel raise test would be used

Other: Assessment of the musculoskeletal system and its functions

Interventions

Assessment of the musculoskeletal system and its functions OTHER

Measurement of sub sole pressure sense, light touch sense, vibration sense and two-point discrimination sense. will be evaluated with. For the evaluation of proprioception, active joint position sense technique was used in plantar flexion (PF): 7°, 14° and 21°; In dorsiflexion (DF), 7° target angles will be used. An Dr. Goniometer will be used to determine target angles. To measure plantarflexion and dorsiflexion muscular strength and endurance will be used with the isokinetic system. Weight-Bearing Lunge test will be used to evaluate ankle mobility. For balance assessment, the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test will be measured using the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral directions. American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society midfoot score and foot and ankle functions Rating Foot and Ankle Outcome Score , which are subjective evaluation methods, will be used to determine the functional level. A heel lift test will be performed to evaluate physical performance.

Healthy Volunteers; Lisfranc injury patients

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 24 people will be included in our study. It will be conducted with 12 Lisfranc injury patients and 12 healthy volunteer participants. All participants will be over 18 years of age.

You may qualify if:

• Having had a Lisfranc injury
• Having only one extremity injured
• Having received surgical treatment
• Being over 18 years old

You may not qualify if:

• Having a neurological problem,
• diabetes
• smoking
• untreated Lisfranc injury
• incomplete medical record
• not wanting to participate in the study
• having a neurovascular injury
• Being healthy
• Any foot pain, history of fractures, etc. Absence of circumstances
• Being over 18 years of age
• Not being healthy
• Any foot pain, history of fractures, etc.
• Not being over 18 years of age

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University: lead

Study Sites (1)

İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilimdalı

Istanbul, Fatih, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Foot Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg Injuries; Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

• ALİ İLEZ

  Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: OTHER
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Research Assistant

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 15, 2024
• First Posted: May 20, 2024
• Study Start: January 2, 2024
• Primary Completion: May 17, 2024
• Study Completion: June 8, 2024
• Last Updated: June 21, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

TU (1)