Controlled Active Motion vs Early Passive Mobilization for Flexor Tendons Repair
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Controlled Active Motion and Early Passive Mobilization Protocols for Rehabilitation of Repaired Flexor Tendons in Zone II
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
2
Brief Summary
a randomized controlled trial tends to compare 2 rehabilitation approaches - early passive mobilization (EPM) and controlled active motion (CAM) - that are commonly used in the treatment of post-surgical flexor tendon repair of the hand
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2024
CompletedJune 6, 2024
June 1, 2024
5 months
May 14, 2024
June 4, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Total active motion (TAM)
Active range of motion in proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) and the distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) of the injured digits will be measured by manual hand goniometry. Outcome will be expressed by Strickland formula. TAM (%) = (Active flexion of PIP+DIP) - Extension Lag of both joints/175× 100 This formula can determine the percentage of recovery of TAM. The results of TAM (%) are classified in four categories: "Excellent, good, fair, and poor"
at baseline
Total active motion (TAM)
This formula can determine the percentage of recovery of TAM. The results of TAM (%) are classified in four categories: "Excellent, good, fair, and poor" This formula determined the percentage of recovery of TAM. The results of TAM (%) were classified in four categories: "Excellent, good, fair, and poor"
after the 12th week of intervention
handgrip strength
Hand dynamometer (Jammer dynamometer) will be used to evaluate hand grip strength. Measurements will be taken for both hands for three times. The mean of three trials will be taken for every measurement occasion. The mean value in the injured hand will be expressed as percentage of the mean value in the non-injured hand as follows: % of hand grip strength = Mean grip strength in the involved hand/ Mean grip strength in the uninvolved hand × 100.
baseline
handgrip strength
Hand dynamometer (Jammer dynamometer) will be used to evaluate hand grip strength. Measurements will be taken for both hands for three times. The mean of three trials will be taken for every measurement occasion. The mean value in the injured hand will be expressed as percentage of the mean value in the non-injured hand as follows: % of hand grip strength = Mean grip strength in the involved hand/ Mean grip strength in the uninvolved hand × 100.
after the 12th week of intervention
Functional disability
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used to measure the functional disabilities. It is a valid questionnaire used in a number of other disabling conditions of the hand. A DASH-questionnaire score, ranges from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means no difficulties in daily living and a score of 100 means maximum difficulties in performing tasks of daily living
at baseline
Functional disability
The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire will be used to measure the functional disabilities. It is a valid questionnaire used in a number of other disabling conditions of the hand. A DASH-questionnaire score, ranges from 0 to 100. A score of 0 means no difficulties in daily living and a score of 100 means maximum difficulties in performing tasks of daily living
after the 12th week of intervention
Study Arms (2)
Early passive mobilization group
EXPERIMENTALThe modified Kleinert protocol will be used as an EPM procedure. Within 3 to 5 days following surgery, the affected hand will be placed inside the dorsal slab Kleinert splint with the wrist in 30-40 flexion; metacarpophalangeal joint (MP) in 60-70-degree flexion; PIP and DIP joints in extension. Rubber band traction will be directed to the fingernail from the wrist, with a palmar pulley system. All patients will perform passive flexion and active extension exercises with an active hold for 2-3 seconds 10 times per hour. Traction will be removed at the end of 3rd week and very gentle active flexion will start at the 4th week. The splint will be removed in the 5th-6th weeks. Blocking exercises will be started at 7th-8th weeks and resisted exercises will be started after the 8th week with the full function permitted by week 12th week .
Controlled active motion group
EXPERIMENTALA modified CAM protocol will be used. Exercises will be performed hourly for 10 repetitions in the form of passive flexion and active extension exercises with an active hold of the fingers in the flexed position for 2-3 seconds.
Interventions
a rehabilitation protocol for post-surgical repair of flexor tendons of the hand
a rehabilitation protocol for post-surgical repair of flexor tendons of the hand
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- males or females
- between 25-50 years
- Post-surgical repair of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) and superficialis (FDS) tendons of a single-digit
- the case should be recent (2-3 days post-surgical)
You may not qualify if:
- age below 25 or above 50
- a systemic disease affecting hand joints such as rheumatic arthritis
- thumb flexor tendon repair will be excluded
- chronic cases
- concurrent injuries such as phalangeal fractures, joint injuries, or significant skin loss
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Hail University Poly Clinic
Hail, 2442, Saudi Arabia
Hisham Hussein
Hail, 3994, Saudi Arabia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2024
First Posted
May 20, 2024
Study Start
June 4, 2024
Primary Completion
October 30, 2024
Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Last Updated
June 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
data will be available with the senior author upon request