NCT06419894

Brief Summary

Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an established non-invasive imaging test for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Fully automated quantitative perfusion CMR (QP CMR) is a new technical advancement, which offers measurement of myocardial blood flow in CMR. Additionally, recent innovations have introduced various contrast-agent-free methods for CAD assessment, such as stress T1 mapping reactivity (∆T1) and oxygen-sensitive CMR (OS CMR). These methods might eliminate the necessity for contrast administration in clinical practice, simplifying, reducing time, invasiveness and costs in evaluating patients with suspected obstructive CAD. The ADVOCATE-CMR study aims to validate QP CMR, ∆T1 and OS CMR imaging against invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) for detection of obstructive CAD. The study also aims to head-to-head compare the diagnostic accuracy of these CMR techniques with the conventional visual assessment of stress perfusion CMR and to correlate them to short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
182

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
86mo left

Started Dec 2024

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress17%
Dec 2024Jun 2033

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2024

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2024

Completed
8.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2033

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2033

Last Updated

November 13, 2024

Status Verified

November 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8.5 years

First QC Date

May 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

November 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonanceQuantitative perfusionStress T1 mapping reactivityOxygen-sensitive cardiac magnetic resonance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress myocardial blood flow [MBF], stress relative MBF [rMBF], myocardial perfusion reserve [MPR] and relative MPR [rMPR]) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR

    Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • Diagnostic accuracy of ΔT1 to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • Diagnostic accuracy of OS CMR (breathing-induced myocardial oxygenation reserve; B-MORE) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR, rMPR), ΔT1, OS CMR (B-MORE) and conventional visual assessment of GBCA-based first pass perfusion imaging to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • Diagnostic accuracy of ΔT1 to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (9)

  • Diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR), ΔT1 and B-MORE to detect microvascular dysfunction (MVD), as defined by CFR

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR), ΔT1 and B-MORE to differentiate between MVD (as defined by CFR) and 3-vessel obstructive CAD

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • Change in stress MBF after revascularization

    ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

  • +6 more other outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

182 symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD (without a previous CAD history), scheduled for invasive coronary angiography according to the decision of the treating clinician.

You may qualify if:

  • Suspected obstructive coronary artery disease
  • No documented prior history of coronary artery disease
  • Clinical referral for invasive coronary angiography according to the referring clinician's decision
  • Competent adult (age ≥18 years)
  • Signed informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • History of coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery)
  • History of coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (myocardial infarction, unstable angina)
  • Use of sildenafil or dipyridamole that cannot be terminated
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Allergic reaction to iodized contrast
  • Concurrent or prior (within last 30 days) participation in other research studies using interventional drugs
  • Extensive comorbidities (i.e. cancer, other severe chronic diseases)
  • Contraindication for cardiac magnetic resonance with gadolinium-based contrast agent (including severe claustrophobia, magnetic resonance unsafe implants/devices or MR conditional devices not suitable for 3T scanner, severe renal failure with estimated glomerular filtration rate\<30 mL/min/1,73 m2, known hypersensitivity for gadolinium-based contrast agent)
  • Contraindications for adenosine usage (including hypersensitivity to adenosine/dipyridamole/regadenoson, second or third degree atrio-ventricular block, sick sinus syndrome, sinus bradycardia (heart rate \<40 bpm), long QT syndrome, severe hypertension (\> 220/120 mmHg), systolic blood pressure \<90mmHg, concomitant use of dipyridamole, severe asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Coronary DiseaseMyocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesArteriosclerosisArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Project Leader

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2024

First Posted

May 17, 2024

Study Start

December 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2033

Last Updated

November 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-11