NCT06418308

Brief Summary

Several studies have shown that adding dexmedetomidine or epinephrine to single-dose spinal analgesia preparations improves the length and/or speed of onset of the sensory block and post-operative pain management without increased negative side effects. To date, however, no study has compared adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in single-dose spinal analgesia. The purpose of this study is to determine if adjunctive intrathecal dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to adjunctive intrathecal epinephrine in providing better single-dose spinal analgesia during cesarean section.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
62

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 13, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 17, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 7, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

May 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

January 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Cesarean SectionSpinal AnesthesiaIntrathecal adjunctsDexmedetomidineEpinephrine

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time required for sensory recovery

    Investigate the efficacy of intrathecal epinephrine versus dexmedetomidine as adjuvant agents in cesarean section. Once the sensory block to pinprick has receded to a T10 level, the spinal is no longer as effective for surgical level pain relief. This is a measure of the duration of the spinal as an effective analgesic. Sensory recovery will be a T10 level. This will be measured in minutes.

    270 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (26)

  • Time to Bromage Score 1

    270 minutes

  • Blood Pressure

    30 minutes

  • Phenylephrine Infusion Rate

    2 to 30 minutes

  • Total Phenylephrine Infusion

    during surgery which can go up to 150 minutes

  • Number of Phenylephrine Boluses

    during surgery which can go up to 150 minutes

  • +21 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Dexmedetomidine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

receiving the addition of 5 mcg of dexmedetomidine to the standard spinal medication mixture.

Drug: DexmedetomidineDrug: Standardized Spinal Mixture

Epinephrine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

receiving the addition of 200 mcg of epinephrine to the standard spinal medication mixture

Drug: EpinephrineDrug: Standardized Spinal Mixture

Interventions

5 mcg of dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine

200 mcg of epinephrine

Epinephrine

Standardized spinal mixture of 10.25 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, and 0.125 mg morphine.

DexmedetomidineEpinephrine

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant patients
  • aged 18-55 years
  • presenting for scheduled primary or secondary cesarean section
  • candidates for single shot spinal anesthesia singleton pregnancy

You may not qualify if:

  • patient refusal of spinal anesthetic
  • if patient is not a candidate for spinal anesthesia due to history of coagulopathy, elevated intracranial pressure, infection at site of injection, etc.
  • emergency cesarean section
  • preexisting motor or sensory deficit
  • suspected pre-eclampsia
  • patient receiving combined spinal-epidural as anesthetic technique
  • BMI \> 40

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mount Sinai Hospital

New York, New York, 10029, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

DexmedetomidineEpinephrine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsEthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAminesBiogenic MonoaminesBiogenic AminesCatecholaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Study Officials

  • Daniel Katz, MD

    Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Patients will be assigned a group by picking from a stack of envelopes. The interventional drug which the envelope contains will be assigned by a random number generator. The interventional drug will be drawn up by an anesthesiologist not involved in the patient's care and the syringe given to the anesthesiologist performing the spinal anesthetic.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomized to either receiving the addition of epinephrine or dexmedetomidine to the standard spinal medication mixture of 10.25 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine, and 0.125 mg morphine.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Vice Chair of Education Department of Anesthesiology, Pain, & Perioperative Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2024

First Posted

May 17, 2024

Study Start

September 17, 2024

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion

March 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan in place to share IPD.

Locations