Effects of FMS Functional Movement Training on Body Posture Control in College Female Aerobics Athletes

NCT06417164 | Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: LLi
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 40
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

For this experiment, it was planned to randomly assign 40 female college aerobics athletes to two groups: a traditional physical training group (control group, T, N=20) and a functional training group (experimental group, F, N=20). The control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on the FMS functional movement design. The experimental group was scheduled to undergo a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. Before and after the experiment, the subjects' FMS scores, body posture control, and competition performance will be measured.

Conditions

Postural Balance

Keywords

Posture control; Functional movement training; Randomized controlled trial,

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• FMS Score

  FMS test scores( in points)

  90days

• Eight-stage abdominal bridge

  Control of body posture stability under static conditions, ( in points)

  90days

• five-step lateral bridge

  Control of frontal body posture stability under static conditions (in points)

  90days

• six supine bridge

  Control of back and hip stability under static conditions (in points)

  90days

Secondary Outcomes (3)

• T-type running

  90days

• Y-type jumping

  90days

• Aerobics competitive performance

  90days

Study Arms (2)

Control, Traditional Physical Training Group

NO INTERVENTION

The control group will use traditional physical training methods.

Intervention, Functional Training Group,

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention, Functional Training Group will use functional movement training methods based on FMS.

Behavioral: Functional Movement Training Group

Interventions

Functional Movement Training Group BEHAVIORAL

The program control group will use traditional physical training methods, while the experimental group will use a training program based on FMS functional movement design. The experimental group will receive a 12-week FMS functional movement training intervention, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The experimental group will be divided into two phases, a corrective intervention phase and a capacity enhancement phase, and the main assessment criteria will include the seven movements of the FMS Functional Movement Test (squat, hurdle step, deep squat, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, trunk stabilizing push-ups, and trunk rotational stabilization), as well as the ability to control the body's dynamic and static postures during aerobic exercise.

Intervention, Functional Training Group,

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 23 Years
• Sex: female
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• ① Must be able to understand and comply with the study regulations and sign an informed consent form.
• ② Have a stable summer training schedule with no plans to return home during the summer.
• ③ No serious diseases or complications.

You may not qualify if:

• Athletes with recent sports injuries who may not participate in the training program.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Lan Li: lead

Study Sites (1)

ZhengZhouU

Zhengzhou, Henan, 450001, China

RECRUITING

Study Officials

• Zijian Zhao

  Zhengzhou University

  STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Lan Li, 2024

CONTACT

+8615038217255; 1096242208@qq.com

Qinghe Wang, 2024

CONTACT

01079286663; 20222102103@kyonggi.ac.kr

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: TRIPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Masking Details: 1. Participants do not know which group they have been assigned to (treatment or control). This can be done by providing all participants with the same information after grouping, without revealing which group they are in, to ensure that they do not know which intervention they are receiving. 2. Trainer blinding is when the trainer does not know which group the participant is in. This can be done by assigning participants to groups by another researcher or by a randomization system to avoid the trainer knowing the participant's group. 3. Outcome assessment is performed by a researcher who does not know the group the participant is in, hiding information about the participant's group, and using a researcher who is independent of the intervention assignment to perform the outcome assessment.
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: lecturers

Model Details: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 7, 2024
• First Posted: May 16, 2024
• Study Start: May 25, 2024
• Primary Completion: August 1, 2024
• Study Completion: September 1, 2024
• Last Updated: May 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
• Time Frame: October 2024

Locations

CN (1)