Quilting Sutures After Mastectomy
BE-Quilt
Comparison of 'Quilting Sutures' With 'Conventional Sutures and Drain Placement' After Mastectomy: a Multicentre, Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
296
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of wound drains after mastectomy is common practice in Belgium. However, placement of suction drainage has several disadvantages. Skin bacteria can enter via the drain and cause infection, or the drain itself can cause discomfort and a need for daily nursing. After drain removal, seroma is the most common complication following breast cancer surgery. Seromas are collections of serous fluid that frequently develop under the skin or in the axillary space formed after mastectomy and/or axillary lymph node dissection, resulting from surgical trauma to blood/lymphatic vessels and post-traumatic inflammation. Seroma formation can cause discomfort and limitations in shoulder function. Moreover, it is associated with surgical site infections, often requires treatment and increases healthcare consumption. Wound healing problems might be a cause of postponement of adjuvant therapy. The quilting suture technique, in which the skin is sutured to the pectoralis muscle and drain placement is not needed, may lead to a significant reduction of seroma with a decrease in the number of aspirations and surgical site infections. In this national multicentric study, we will compare mastectomy with placement of suction drains, a standard technique used in the vast majority of Belgian hospitals, with the new quilting suture technique without placement of suction drains. We will focus on 3 distinct primary outcomes:
- Pain of the mastectomy area 6 months after surgery
- Upper limb function 6 months after surgery
- Cosmetic outcome scored by the patient 6 months after surgery. The goal of this study is to demonstrate the absence of long-term negative effects of the quilting suture technique on shoulder function, cosmetic outcome, and pain management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2027
October 21, 2024
October 1, 2024
2.5 years
May 7, 2024
October 17, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain in the mastectomy area scored by VAS
A non-inferiority margin of 10 mm was adopted, which implies that a difference between both arms up to 10 mm in favour of the standard approach would be clinically acceptable
6 months postoperative
Upper limb function scored by QuickDASH
A non-inferiority margin of 10 points was adopted, which implies that a difference between both arms up to 10 points in favour of the standard approach would be clinically acceptable.
6 months postoperative
Cosmetic outcome scored by the patient on a 10-point scale
A non-inferiority margin of 1 point on the 10-point scale was adopted which implies that a difference between both arms up to 1 point in favour of the standard approach would be clinically acceptable
6 months postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Quilting sutures without drain placement
EXPERIMENTALConventional sutures with drain placement
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The nipple-areola complex is removed, and dissection of skin flaps is performed using electrocautery. The breast tissue, including the prepectoral fascia is removed from the pectoral muscle. After the mastectomy, the skin flaps are sutured onto the pectoral muscle using polyfilament absorbable sutures (e.g. Stratafix PDS® 1 CT needle) placed at 4- to 5-cm intervals in two or three rows depending on the extent of the skin flaps. Care is taken to prevent dimpling of the skin. The axillary region is also approximated. Care is taken to prevent damage to nerves and blood vessels. No suction drains are placed. For skin closure, the edges are sutured using absorbable monofilament sutures (e.g. Biosyn l® 3-0, Monocryl® 3-0) depending on the surgeon's preference.
The nipple-areola complex is removed, and dissection of skin flaps is performed using electrocautery. The breast tissue, including the prepectoral fascia is removed from the pectoral muscle. After mastectomy no flap fixation is performed. The skin is closed in a conventional manner using an absorbable skin suture. One or two suction drains are placed before skin closure. The drains are placed in the mastectomy gutter lateral to the pectoral muscle and/or in the prepectoral area. For skin closure, the edges are sutured using absorbable monofilament sutures (e.g. Biosyn l® 3-0, Monocryl® 3-0) depending on the surgeon's preference. Drain output is recorded daily. Drain removal policy varies among participating centres. In some centres drain removal is based on volume of drained fluids while in other centres it depends on the postoperative time
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- capable of giving written informed consent
- age ≥ 18 years
- scheduled for unilateral mastectomy without immediate breast reconstruction with or without axillary surgery (sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection)
You may not qualify if:
- scheduled for mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction
- scheduled for synchronous bilateral breast and/or axillary surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Surgical Oncology, UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ann Smeets, MD,PhD
UZ Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2024
First Posted
May 16, 2024
Study Start
September 23, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Last Updated
October 21, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share