Ciprofol Versus Propofol in Patients Undergoing Painless Hysteroscopy
Efficacy and Safety of Ciprofol Versus Propofol in Patients Undergoing Painless Hysteroscopy
1 other identifier
interventional
188
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Ciprofol exhibits comparable efficacy to that of propofol, and is associated with less injection pain rate, fewer adverse events, higher patient satisfaction, and more stable hemodynamics when used for general anesthesia during the painless hysteroscopy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 10, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2024
CompletedAugust 7, 2024
August 1, 2024
1 month
May 7, 2024
August 6, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Injection pain
The injection pain was defined as the pain reported verbally by patients during the first injection of the investigational drugs (ciprofol or propofol). The Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) was used to evaluate the pain level. The anesthesiologist asks the patient during the first injection of the investigational drug (ciprofol or propofol), "Do you feel arm pain from the injection? Patients who answered "yes" was asked to describe the level of the pain (a score of 0 to 10 indicated "painless" to "unbearable pain"). The pain level was divided into painless (0 points), mild pain (1-3 points), and moderate to severe pain (4-10 points).
24 hours within hysteroscopy
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Sedation success rate
24 hours within hysteroscopy
Anesthesia success rate
24 hours within hysteroscopy
time for successful anesthesia induction
24 hours within hysteroscopy
recovery time
24 hours within hysteroscopy
use of rescue drugs
24 hours within hysteroscopy
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Ciprofol group (ciprofol combined with alfentanil)
EXPERIMENTALPropofol group (propofol combined with alfentanil)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The experimental group was slowly injected with ciprofol for 30 seconds (0.4mg/kg, Haisike Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China, batch number 20220911).
The control group was slowly injected with propofol for 30 seconds (2mg/kg, Guorui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Sichuan, China, batch number 22102914).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age ≥ 18 years old;
- undergoing hysteroscopy examination and requiring intravenous anesthesia;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to II;
- without communication difficulties, and able to cooperate with intervention implementation;
- participating in this trial voluntarily, and signing an informed consent form;
You may not qualify if:
- with contraindications for hysteroscopy examination (such as cervical stenosis, difficulty in cervical dilation, reproductive tract infections such as vaginitis and cervicitis) or allergies to the intended anesthetic drugs;
- with severe cardiac insufficiency, liver and kidney dysfunction, and other major diseases;
- with a history of uterine surgery within the past three months;
- body temperature above 37.5 ℃ before the anesthesia;
- long-term use of sedative or analgesic drugs.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (1)
Li A, Li N, Zhu L, Xu Z, Wang Y, Li J, Zhang G. The efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol in patients undergoing painless hysteroscopy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Nov 12;24(1):411. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02787-0.
PMID: 39533194DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lei Zhu
the First Central Hospital of Baoding
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2024
First Posted
May 14, 2024
Study Start
August 10, 2024
Primary Completion
September 9, 2024
Study Completion
September 10, 2024
Last Updated
August 7, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share