Multi-modal Training Program to Promote Physical Activity After Stroke
Multi-mOdal Training Program to Promote Physical actIVity After sTrokE: MOTIVATE
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to learn if a behavioral change intervention can improve physical activity in stroke survivors living in the community. The main question it aims to answer is, if a behaviour change intervention and personalised physical activity prescription, are effective in improving the time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity amongst chronic stroke survivors. Researchers will compare the intervention group to a control group, to see if physical activity counselling and a personalized physical activity prescription is more effective in improving moderate to vigorous physical activity, than usual care alone. The study period for each participant is 6 months. Assessments are conducted at month 1 (baseline), 3 and 6. The control group will receive only usual care, which consists of an information sheet on physical activity with the following content: (1) Why be active and (2) How to be active (with URL links to resources and videos). The usual care is delivered at 3-time points during month 1, 3 and 6. The intervention group will receive usual care and a behavioral change intervention. The behavioral change intervention consists of up to 6 individual physical activity counselling sessions and a personalized physical activity prescription. The 6 sessions will take place only during months 1 to 3 and there will be no intervention during months 4 to 6. Of the 6 sessions, 3 are conducted face-to-face and another 3 sessions will take place using telehealth methods such as phone, text messaging and videoconference. Participants can meet the study physiotherapist at their preferred exercise space during the 3 face-to-face sessions. The physical activity counselling sessions consist of goal setting and action planning, and problem-solving barriers around participation in physical activity. The overall aim is to increase time spent in moderate-vigorous physical activity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 7, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2027
April 27, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.6 years
May 7, 2024
April 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of moderate to vigorous physical activity
Average minutes/day, measured by Fitbit Inspire 3 tracker
Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Number of steps per day
Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF)
Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Modified Rankin Scale
Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Functional Ambulation Category
Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
Comfortable gait speed
Initial assessment (month 1), month 3 and 6 follow-up.
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALStudy period: 6 months (1st 3 months intervention, last 3 months no intervention) No. of sessions: up to 6 per participant Mode: 3 sessions are conducted face-to-face and 3 sessions via telehealth methods e.g. phone, text message or video conferencing using virtual platforms like zoom. Where: Face-to-face at the participant's preferred exercise space like home, outdoor fitness zone, parks, gyms etc. Duration of sessions: each face-to-face session will take 60-90 mins Details of intervention: Physical activity counselling on adaptation of exercises, goal setting, action planning, problem solving around barriers to physical activity and provision of study resources
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy period: 6 months No. of sessions: 2 sessions (at month 1 and 3) Mode: Face-to-face Where: At the participant's home Duration of session: 20- 30 minutes Details of control: physical activity information without any other support.
Interventions
Please refer to arm descriptions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 21 years and over
- Haemorrhagic or ischaemic stroke
- At least 6 months post-stroke
- Living at home
- Able to walk independently +/- gait aid short distances (self-reported)
- Have sufficient cognition and/or carer support to engage in the interventions (clinical judgement)
- Agreement to undertake a supported self-management physical activity intervention programme
You may not qualify if:
- Living in residential care
- Unstable cardiac conditions, severe arthritis, or other conditions limiting the ability to exercise
- Advised by GP/consultant not to undertake moderate-intensity exercise for health reason
- Currently already participating in physical activity that meets recommended levels (150mins of moderate-vigorous physical activity)
- Enrolled in another physical activity intervention trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Singapore General Hospitallead
- Singapore Institute of Technologycollaborator
- National Neuroscience Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
Related Publications (15)
Hardie K, Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson C. Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004 Mar;35(3):731-5. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000116183.50167.D9. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
PMID: 14764929BACKGROUNDTuran TN, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, Egan BM, Le NA, Lopes-Virella MF, Hermayer KL, Harrell J, Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Janis LS, Lane B, Montgomery J, Chimowitz MI. Relationship between risk factor control and vascular events in the SAMMPRIS trial. Neurology. 2017 Jan 24;88(4):379-385. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003534. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
PMID: 28003500BACKGROUNDFini NA, Bernhardt J, Said CM, Billinger SA. How to Address Physical Activity Participation After Stroke in Research and Clinical Practice. Stroke. 2021 Jun;52(6):e274-e277. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034557. Epub 2021 May 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 33951930BACKGROUNDWHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566045/
PMID: 33369898BACKGROUNDBillinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng JJ, Franklin BA, Johnson CM, MacKay-Lyons M, Macko RF, Mead GE, Roth EJ, Shaughnessy M, Tang A; American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Clinical Cardiology. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014 Aug;45(8):2532-53. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022. Epub 2014 May 20.
PMID: 24846875BACKGROUNDThilarajah S, Bower KJ, Pua YH, Tan D, Williams G, Larik A, Bok CW, Koh G, Clark RA. Modifiable Factors Associated With Poststroke Physical Activity at Discharge From Rehabilitation: Prospective Cohort Study. Phys Ther. 2020 May 18;100(5):818-828. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa022.
PMID: 31995190BACKGROUNDFini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, Simek J, Bernhardt J. How Physically Active Are People Following Stroke? Systematic Review and Quantitative Synthesis. Phys Ther. 2017 Jul 1;97(7):707-717. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx038.
PMID: 28444348BACKGROUNDThilarajah S, Mentiplay BF, Bower KJ, Tan D, Pua YH, Williams G, Koh G, Clark RA. Factors Associated With Post-Stroke Physical Activity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1876-1889. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.09.117. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
PMID: 29056502BACKGROUNDMoncion K, Biasin L, Jagroop D, Bayley M, Danells C, Mansfield A, Salbach NM, Inness E, Tang A. Barriers and Facilitators to Aerobic Exercise Implementation in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020 Jul;44(3):179-187. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000318.
PMID: 32516297BACKGROUNDCommittee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Points to consider on switching between superiority and non-inferiority. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Sep;52(3):223-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0306-5251.2001.01397-3.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 11560553BACKGROUNDYarnell CJ, Abrams D, Baldwin MR, Brodie D, Fan E, Ferguson ND, Hua M, Madahar P, McAuley DF, Munshi L, Perkins GD, Rubenfeld G, Slutsky AS, Wunsch H, Fowler RA, Tomlinson G, Beitler JR, Goligher EC. Clinical trials in critical care: can a Bayesian approach enhance clinical and scientific decision making? Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Feb;9(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30471-9. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
PMID: 33227237BACKGROUNDChang BH, Pocock S. Analyzing data with clumping at zero. An example demonstration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;53(10):1036-43. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00223-7.
PMID: 11027937BACKGROUNDThorn JC, Coast J, Cohen D, Hollingworth W, Knapp M, Noble SM, Ridyard C, Wordsworth S, Hughes D. Resource-use measurement based on patient recall: issues and challenges for economic evaluation. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Jun;11(3):155-61. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0022-4.
PMID: 23529715BACKGROUNDHodgson TA. Costs of illness in cost-effectiveness analysis. A review of the methodology. Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec;6(6):536-52. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00007.
PMID: 10155283BACKGROUNDStinnett AA, Mullahy J. Net health benefits: a new framework for the analysis of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 1998 Apr-Jun;18(2 Suppl):S68-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989X98018002S09.
PMID: 9566468BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shamala Thilarajah, PhD
Singapore General Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Only the outcomes assessor is masked. No other parties are masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 7, 2024
First Posted
May 10, 2024
Study Start
June 11, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 31, 2027
Last Updated
April 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- To be published ahead of the completion of the trial
- Access Criteria
- The protocol will be available as per the publishing journal's options.
The study protocol with the statistical analysis plan will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.