NCT06407466

Brief Summary

The aim of the research is to evaluate the effects of tool-assisted soft tissue mobilization and kinesiology tape applications applied to the Hamstring muscle on balance, agility and jumping in athletics athletes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 6, 2024

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 9, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 9, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Unipedal Stance Test

    It is a static balance test. For the test, participants are asked to stand on their chosen foot; the other foot is lifted (it should be close to but not touching the ankle on the floor), while the arms are positioned diagonally across the chest. You are told to focus on a point at eye level during the test. When the participant lifts his feet off the ground, time calculation begins using a stopwatch. The time calculation ends when the participant does one of the following: Uses arms (i.e. does not cross arms), uses lifted foot, moves weight-bearing foot to maintain balance. The process is repeated 3 times and the best of 3 attempts is recorded. A 5-minute rest is allowed between each set of trials to prevent fatigue.There is no maximum minimum wage.

    6 weeks

  • Agility T Test

    The T test consists of 4 contact points formed in a T shape in an area of 10m length and 10m width. The aim is to complete a series that requires the subject to move in different directions and in different ways between these contact points in the shortest time possible. The difference between this test and other agility tests is that the subject always looks in the same direction. It changes direction by sliding steps to the right and left or by running backwards. This test requires two 900° and 1800° turns, as well as 10m forward, 10m right, 10m left and 10m back, for a total distance of 40m. The subjects' toes are placed just behind the line, their feet are at normal range, they are parallel to the ground, their arms are in front, their knees are bent, they jump as far as they can with the arms swinging, and both feet touch the ground at the same time. The test is repeated twice and the athletes' best distance is recorded in meters.There is no maximum minimum wage.

    6 weeks

Study Arms (3)

taping

EXPERIMENTAL

kinesiotape

Other: taping

mobilization

EXPERIMENTAL

instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization

Other: mobilization

control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Those who did not receive any intervention

Other: Control

Interventions

tapingOTHER

Kinesiology taping; In order to facilitate the muscle, while the subject is standing and his body is flexed to ensure hip flexion, both "I" bands will be applied from the origin to the insertion, with 30% stretching from the medial and lateral, starting from the Ischial Tuberositas to the border of the Popliteal Fossa.

taping
ControlOTHER

The routine training program will continue without intervention.

control

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization; The subject is in a prone position on a bed, with the lower extremity in a neutral position, and a hazelnut-sized amount of lubricant will be applied to the working surface, and will be applied to the skin on the back of the upper leg for 5 minutes, targeting the tissue structures. (Hamstring and deep fascia covering this muscle) Pressure and speed will be adjusted according to the subject's tolerance so as not to cause pain.

mobilization

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Have been doing athletics for the last 6 months and participate in training regularly,
  • Are between the ages of 10-40,
  • Those who train at least 3 days a week,
  • Athletes who have consent to participate in the study (athletes between the ages of 10-18 with consent from their parents) will be included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Having any history of injury or acute infection,
  • Having a systemic and metabolic disease,
  • Having a history of chronic pain,
  • Having an unhealed or unstable bone fracture,
  • Athletes with allergies, infections or open wounds on the skin will not be included.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Uskudar Üniversity

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Rana A, Tyagi D, Alghadir AH, Khan M. Effects of Kinesio taping on calf muscle fatigue in college female athletes: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Oct 28;101(43):e31004. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000031004.

    PMID: 36316875BACKGROUND
  • Ikeda N, Otsuka S, Kawanishi Y, Kawakami Y. Effects of Instrument-assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Musculoskeletal Properties. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Oct;51(10):2166-2172. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002035.

    PMID: 31083046BACKGROUND
  • Kim J, Sung DJ, Lee J. Therapeutic effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization for soft tissue injury: mechanisms and practical application. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Feb 28;13(1):12-22. doi: 10.12965/jer.1732824.412. eCollection 2017 Feb.

    PMID: 28349028BACKGROUND
  • Mostafavifar M, Wertz J, Borchers J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of kinesio taping for musculoskeletal injury. Phys Sportsmed. 2012 Nov;40(4):33-40. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.11.1986.

    PMID: 23306413BACKGROUND
  • Kaya Kara O, Atasavun Uysal S, Turker D, Karayazgan S, Gunel MK, Baltaci G. The effects of Kinesio Taping on body functions and activity in unilateral spastic cerebral palsy: a single-blind randomized controlled trial. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015 Jan;57(1):81-8. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12583. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

    PMID: 25213082BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Athletic Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Duygu KARACALİOĞLU

    Uskudar University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2024

First Posted

May 9, 2024

Study Start

May 9, 2024

Primary Completion

July 1, 2024

Study Completion

July 1, 2024

Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations