NCT06404996

Brief Summary

The objective of the research is to compare the written voiding diary method to the smart-phone diary, DryDawn®, which the investigators selected among several applications using specific criteria appropriate to our population. The investigators aim is to describe the method that proves to be most efficient by assessing which diary provides the best quality and amount of information, and draws the highest level of satisfaction from participants. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a questionnaire that was designed for use in this study.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2024

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2024

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

voiding dysfunctionbladderchildrenvoiding diarysmart-phone

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The percentage of diary completion

    The percentage/number of patients of each group who will complete the diary and send it on-time.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Patient's satisfaction assessment by the Voiding diary Satisfaction Questionnaire

    1 year

Study Arms (2)

Smart-phone diary

EXPERIMENTAL

smart-phone voiding diary application

Device: Smart-phone Voiding Diary

Paper diary

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Conventional paper based voiding diary

Diagnostic Test: Paper voiding diary

Interventions

Smart-phone Voiding Diary

Also known as: DryDawn
Smart-phone diary
Paper voiding diaryDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Conventional Paper voiding diary

Paper diary

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • New patients who have a voiding dysfunction that necessitates the use of a voiding diary
  • Children ages six (6) to eighteen (18) years
  • Participants must own a smart-phone

You may not qualify if:

  • Children less than six (6) years of age
  • Participants who do not own a smart-phone

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Amr Hodhod, MD, PhD, Msc

    King Abdullah International Medical Research Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Amr Hodhod, MD, PhD, Msc

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2024

First Posted

May 8, 2024

Study Start

August 1, 2024

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

February 28, 2026

Last Updated

May 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Because of data ownership policy of our institution, I may not able to share full data unless approved by the ethical committee