NCT06403644

Brief Summary

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) involves applying non-ionizing forms of light from sources including lasers, LEDs, and broadband light, in the visible and near infrared spectrum, to the body to enhance performance, stimulate healing, modulate recovery, and improve health. The investigators will conduct a single-blinded randomized-control trial with sham control to investigate the effectiveness of providing PBMT in a military population, translating this cutting-edge research to application in the operational setting.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
41

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
29mo left

Started Mar 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress48%
Mar 2024Sep 2028

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 11, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2024

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 19, 2025

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2028

Expected
Last Updated

May 4, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

PhotobiomodulationRecoveryWellness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Proinflammatory Blood Biomarkers

    Changes in blood biomarkers (MSD proinflammatory panel: IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-12p70, IL-17A, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha) compared across the sham and active PBMT conditions. As elevated proinflammatory cytokine levels may be a sign of heightened inflammation, lower proinflammatory cytokine levels at the end of the active condition compared to the beginning of the block, along with no statistical change at the end of the sham block condition compared to the beginning of the sham block, may indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Anti-Inflammatory Blood Biomarkers

    Changes in blood biomarkers (MSD anti-inflammatory panel: IL-4, IL-10) compared across the sham and active PBMT conditions. As elevated anti-inflammatory cytokine levels may be a sign of lowered inflammation, higher anti-inflammatory cytokine levels at the end of the active condition compared to the beginning of the block, along with no statistical change at the end of the sham block condition compared to the beginning of the sham block, may indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Saliva Biomarkers

    Changes in saliva biomarkers (cytokine panel: IL-1 Beta, IL-6, IL-8 \& TNF-alpha) compared across the sham and active PBMT conditions. As elevated proinflammatory cytokines may be a sign of heightened inflammation, lower cytokine levels in saliva samples at the end of the active condition compared to the beginning of the block, along with no statistical change at the end of the sham block condition compared to the beginning of the sham block, may indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Heart Rate

    Acute heart rate variability differences within a single treatment session and trends across treatment weeks compared to sham PBMT. Higher heart rate variability and/or lower resting heart rate during active PBMT may indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale Scores

    Differences in self reported Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale (DVPRS) scores during active PBMT weeks are compared with baseline and sham PBMT weeks. The Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale is a 0-10 color coded scale where green represents mild pain with a scale ranging from 0-4; yellow represents moderate pain with a scale ranging from 5-6, and red represents severe pain with a scale ranging from 7-10. Lower DVPRS scores in active PBMT conditions when compared to sham conditions would indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Athletic Mental Energy Scale Scores

    Differences in self reported Athletic Mental Energy Scale (AMES) scores during active PBMT weeks are compared with baseline and sham PBMT weeks. The Athletic Mental Energy Scale comprises 18 items measuring athletes' perception of their energy state, including vigor, confidence, motivation, tirelessness, concentration, and calm. Participants rate their feelings on a 6-point Likert scale (1 = not at all, 6 = completely so). Higher AMES scores in active PBMT conditions when compared to sham conditions could indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of PBMT versus Sham PBMT on Epworth Sleepiness Scale Scores

    Differences in self reported Epworth Sleepiness Scale scores during active PBMT weeks are compared with baseline and sham PBMT weeks. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale results range from 0 to 24. Results from 0 to 10 show average (normal) daytime sleepiness, results under 10 may not be cause for concern or could identify trouble sleeping (insomnia), 11 to 24 indicates excessive (abnormal) daytime sleepiness. Lower Epworth Sleepiness Scale Scores scores in active PBMT conditions when compared to sham conditions could indicate a more ideal treatment outcome.

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Effects of using PBMT Light Beds at Different Power Intensities on Anti-Inflammatory Blood Biomarkers

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of using PBMT Light Beds at Different Power Intensities on Proinflammatory Blood Biomarkers

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of using PBMT Light Beds at Different Power Intensities on Saliva Biomarkers

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of using PBMT Light Beds at Different Power Intensities on Heart Rate

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • Effects of using PBMT Light Beds at Different Power Intensities on Defense Veterans Pain Rating Scale Scores

    Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks.

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Active Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed Therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active treatment will be provided via a specialized full body light bed equipped with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) emitting specific wavelengths of light. The participant will be asked to lay in the bed for a 20-minute session. Treatment will be provided 3 times a week for 3 weeks.

Device: NovoTHOR XL Photobiomodulation Full Body Light BedDevice: ARRC LED Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed

Sham Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed Therapy

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham-PBMT will be delivered in the same manner as indicated for the Active treatment process, but the devices will not be turned on. The participant will be asked to lay in a specialized full body light bed equipped with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for a 20-minute session. Sham-PBMT Treatment will be provided 3 times a week for 3 weeks.

Device: NovoTHOR XL Photobiomodulation Full Body Light BedDevice: ARRC LED Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed

Interventions

Low powered full-body photobiomodulation light bed therapy will be administered via the NovoTHOR XL light therapy bed which emits an average irradiance of \~30 mW/cm\^2.

Active Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed TherapySham Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed Therapy

High powered full-body photobiomodulation light bed therapy will be administered via the ARRC LED light therapy bed which emits an average irradiance of \~75 mW/cm\^2.

Active Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed TherapySham Photobiomodulation Full Body Light Bed Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Active-duty military personnel, government civilians, and government contractors
  • Between the ages of 18-45 years old (inclusive)
  • Ability to read and understand English language
  • Willingness and ability to commit to study procedures, including study intervention and follow-up

You may not qualify if:

  • Body fat \> 40%
  • Weight exceeds 300lbs
  • Height exceeds 7ft 3in
  • \> 10% of full body coverage of tattoos
  • Cardiovascular disease requiring medical management
  • Currently utilizing a pacemaker
  • Currently utilizing select medications (e.g., statins, diuretics, antihypertensive agents)
  • Currently utilizing medications associated with sensitivity to heat or light (e.g., amiodarone, chlorpromazine, doxycycline, hydrochlorothiazide, nalidixic acid, naproxen, piroxicam, tetracycline, thioridazine, voriconazole)
  • Currently undergoing treatment for a brain-related injury
  • Diagnosis of autoimmune diseases
  • Diagnosis of porphyria (light induced allergy) or photosensitive eczema
  • Diagnosis of Cancer
  • Diagnosis of epilepsy and/or being seizure prone
  • Diagnosis of diabetes
  • Diagnosis of Lupus Erythematosus
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wright Patterson Air Force Base

Beavercreek, Ohio, 45324, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Ailioaie LM, Litscher G. Photobiomodulation and Sports: Results of a Narrative Review. Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 3;11(12):1339. doi: 10.3390/life11121339.

    PMID: 34947870BACKGROUND
  • Anders JJ, Lanzafame RJ, Arany PR. Low-level light/laser therapy versus photobiomodulation therapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Apr;33(4):183-4. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.9848. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25844681BACKGROUND
  • Heiskanen V, Hamblin MR. Photobiomodulation: lasers vs. light emitting diodes? Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2018 Aug 8;17(8):1003-1017. doi: 10.1039/c8pp90049c.

    PMID: 30044464BACKGROUND
  • Rossato M, Dellagrana RA, Sakugawa RL, Baroni BM, Diefenthaeler F. Dose-Response Effect of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Muscle Performance and Fatigue During a Multiple-Set Knee Extension Exercise: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Dec;38(12):758-765. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4820. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

    PMID: 33232629BACKGROUND
  • Tumilty S, Mani R, Baxter GD. Photobiomodulation and eccentric exercise for Achilles tendinopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Jan;31(1):127-35. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1840-4. Epub 2015 Nov 26.

    PMID: 26610637BACKGROUND
  • de Paiva PR, Tomazoni SS, Johnson DS, Vanin AA, Albuquerque-Pontes GM, Machado CD, Casalechi HL, de Carvalho PT, Leal-Junior EC. Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and/or cryotherapy in skeletal muscle restitution, what is better? A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Dec;31(9):1925-1933. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2071-z. Epub 2016 Sep 13.

    PMID: 27624781BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Jason Eckerle

    United States Air Force Research Laboratory

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
To prevent possible bias between the sham and active conditions, both groups will receive light filtering glasses (to control for light perception), noise-cancelling headphones, and be in a controlled temperature room.
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants will have two 3-week periods of treatment with a washout week in-between treatment. Participants will be randomized to either sham PBM treatment or active PBM treatment first.
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2024

First Posted

May 8, 2024

Study Start

March 11, 2024

Primary Completion

December 19, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations