Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries
TENS-ANOCA
The Novel Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Patients With Angina and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: a Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In patients with angina pectoris undergoing a coronary angiography (CAG) up to 40% do not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The majority of patients with no obstructive CAD are women with a frequency of up to 70% compared to 50% in men. These patients are diagnosed as having angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). There are two endotypes of ANOCA. The first endotype is microvascular angina (MVA) caused by a combination of structural microcirculatory remodelling and functional arteriolar dysregulation, also called coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). The second endotype is vasospastic angina (VSA) caused by epicardial coronary artery spasm that occurs when a hyper-reactive epicardial coronary segment is exposed to a vasoconstrictor stimulus. Both endotypes of ANOCA are associated with significantly greater one-year risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and all-cause mortality, have a significantly impaired quality of life and have a high health care resource utilisation. The current treatment for ANOCA consists of three aspects. The first aspect is managing lifestyle factors such as weight management, smoking cessation and exercise. The second aspect is managing known cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus. And the third aspect is antianginal medication. In both endotypes ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers should be considered. In MVA the antianginal medication that can be used are betablocker, calcium channel blocker, nicorandil, ranolazine, ivabradine and/or trimetazidine. In VSA calcium channel blocker, long-acting nitrate and/or nicorandil can be initiated as antianginal therapy. Despite these treatment option approximately 25% of ANOCA patients have refractory angina symptoms. A possible treatment modality for ANOCA patients with refractory angina pectoris is spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Previous research (in patients with cardiac syndrome X) has shown that SCS improves time until angina and ischaemia, significantly less angina and an improvement in quality of life. These findings suggest that SCS and/or TENS could be a possible treatment modality for patients with ANOCA. The aim of this pilot study is to investigate whether treatment with TENS during a one month period leads to a significant reduction of angina pectoris and therefore a significant improvement in quality of life in patients with proven ANOCA, encompassing both endotypes (MVA and VSA).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedMay 6, 2024
May 1, 2024
7 months
May 2, 2024
May 2, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in summary score of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Change in the summary score of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SS SAQ) after 1 month treatment with TENS, compared to baseline.
Baseline; 1 month
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change in physical limitations domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Baseline; 1 month
Change in angina frequency domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Baseline; 1 month
Change in angina stability domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Baseline; 1 month
Change in treatment satisfaction domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Baseline; 1 month
Change in quality of life domain of Seattle Angina Questionnaire
Baseline; 1 month
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Side effects of TENS use
1 month
Study Arms (1)
Open label
OTHERSee intervention: all patients included in the study will receive TENS treatment for a period of 1 month
Interventions
Device consists of two electrodes that are applied to the chest region and are connected to a battery operated TENS (Frequency 80Hz, pulse width 150us and amplitude variable (patient dependent)). The device will be used a minimum of three times daily for 30 minutes and additionally during symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) (CCS class III or IV)
- Microvascular angina (MVA):
- FFR \> 0.8
- CFR \< 2.0
- IMR ≥ 25
- Vasospastic angina (VSA):
- FFR \> 0.8
- CFR ≥ 2.0
- IMR \< 25
- During acetylcholine testing: ≥ 90% diameter reduction, angina pectoris and ischaemic ECG changes
- Persisting angina pectoris despite optimal medical therapy (OMT) defined as:
- MVA: Betablocker, calcium channel blocker, nicorandil and/or ivabradine (Important side note: ranolazine and trimetazidine cannot be prescribed in the Netherlands).
- VSA: Calcium channel blocker, long-acting nitrate and/or nicorandil. In the maximum tolerated dose. If the patient is currently not using one of the medications due to side-effects, this should be clearly stated.
- Age \> 18 years
You may not qualify if:
- Both endotypes (VSA and MVA) present based on CFT findings.
- Inability to give informed consent
- Inability to perform a 6-minute walking test
- The presence of a cardiac implanted electronic device (CIED); pacemaker and/or Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD). Due to the risk of interference between TENS and CIED
- Presence of a spinal cord stimulator for another indication such as complex regional pain syndrome, failed back surgery syndrome, etc.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, 5623EJ, Netherlands
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2024
First Posted
May 6, 2024
Study Start
March 13, 2024
Primary Completion
October 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share