HFNC vs Two Nare HFNC in Extubated Patients
HFNC
A Comparison of Conventional High Flow Nasal Cannula vs Two-nare Size High Flow Nasal Cannula: A Randomized Crossover Trial in Extubated Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are introduced to clinical practice to improve oxygenation. Our group were the first to report the use of HFNC in extubated patients that showed comparable delivery of oxygen and improved comfort. These HFNC are subsequently shown to be useful in several clinical conditions in critically ill patients including respiratory failure due to hypoxia, hypercapnia (exacerbation of chronic obstructive lung disease), or post-extubation, pre-intubation oxygenation, and others. Recently a new mode of high flow oxygen therapy has been presented on the market where the prongs of high flow have two different diameters. These two-nare size high flow nasal cannula are capable of delivering gases at a flow rate of 15-50 L/min, similar to the conventional HFNP but the difference in the diameters provide different levels of positive pressure as compared to conventional HFNP. This positive pressure could help in gas exchange of patients who need more oxygen. These devices are approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA); the medicine and therapeutic regulatory agency of the Australian Government. Our aim is to compare the two size nare high flow nasal cannula with conventional high flow nasal cannula in extubated patients in intensive care unit in a randomised crossover trial. The comparison will include arterial blood gasses, physiological data including heart rate, respiratory rate, saturations as well as comfort and tolerance of the patients to two size nare high flow nasal cannuale.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedMay 3, 2024
February 1, 2024
2.2 years
March 24, 2024
April 30, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Blood gasses (PaO2 in mmHg)
To compare if there is difference in PaO2 between two nare and connventional high flow nasal cannula.
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Blood gasses (PaCO2 in mmHg)
To compare if there is difference in PaCO2 between two nare and connventional high flow nasal cannula.
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Blood gasses (SaO2 percentage)
To compare if there is difference in SaO2 between two nare and connventional high flow nasal cannula.
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
blood pressure (mmHg)
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Respiratory rate (breaths per minute)
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Tolerance as assessed by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4.
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Comfort as assessed by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5.
30 minutes each for a total of one hour.
Study Arms (2)
Two Nare (Duet) high flow nasal cannula
ACTIVE COMPARATORRecently a new mode of high flow oxygen therapy has presented on the market where the cannula of high flow have different diameters. Left cannula larger in diameter than the right. These two-nare size high flow nasal cannula are capable of delivering gases at a flow rate of 15-60 L/min, similar to the conventional HFNP but the difference in the diameters provide different levels of positive pressure as compared to conventional HFNP. The two nare nasal cannula will be used for 30 minutes to assess the gas exchange, hemodynamic parameters, the tolerance and comfort of the device to the patient.
Conventional High flow nasal cannula
PLACEBO COMPARATORConventional high flow nasal cannula that has been used for many years will be compared with two-nare high flow nasal cannula. The two nare nasal cannula will be used for 30 minutes to assess the gas exchange, hemodynamic parameters, the tolerance and comfort of the device to the patient.
Interventions
Recently a new mode of high flow oxygen therapy has presented on the market where the prongs of high flow have different diameters .These two-nare size high flow nasal cannula are capable of delivering gases at a flow rate of 15-50 L/min, similar to the conventional HFNP but the difference in the diameters provide different levels of positive pressure as compared to conventional HFNP.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All intubated patients imminently requiring extubation with family consent for admittance into the trial that meet the follow criteria:
- P/F ratio between \> 150 prior to extubation
- Has a functional arterial catheter to allow sample of arterial blood gasses.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients being extubated due to withdrawal of therapy Patients being extubated, that are expected to imminently die post extubation P/F Ratio :\< 150 Patients extubated on to non-invasive ventilation Patients with known epistaxis or nasal surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Peninsula Healthlead
Study Sites (1)
Frankston Hospital
Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia
Related Publications (1)
Tiruvoipati R, Reddy MP, Paul E, Gupta S, Subramaniam A, Zhang D, Haji K. A comparison of conventional high-flow nasal cannula vs the duet high-flow nasal cannula in extubated patients: a randomized crossover trial. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Mar 26;30(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02447-0.
PMID: 40140950DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
RAVINDRANATH TIRUVOIPATI, PhD
Peninsula Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2024
First Posted
May 3, 2024
Study Start
July 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 1, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
May 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02