NCT06398951

Brief Summary

High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are introduced to clinical practice to improve oxygenation. Our group were the first to report the use of HFNC in extubated patients that showed comparable delivery of oxygen and improved comfort. These HFNC are subsequently shown to be useful in several clinical conditions in critically ill patients including respiratory failure due to hypoxia, hypercapnia (exacerbation of chronic obstructive lung disease), or post-extubation, pre-intubation oxygenation, and others. Recently a new mode of high flow oxygen therapy has been presented on the market where the prongs of high flow have two different diameters. These two-nare size high flow nasal cannula are capable of delivering gases at a flow rate of 15-50 L/min, similar to the conventional HFNP but the difference in the diameters provide different levels of positive pressure as compared to conventional HFNP. This positive pressure could help in gas exchange of patients who need more oxygen. These devices are approved by the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA); the medicine and therapeutic regulatory agency of the Australian Government. Our aim is to compare the two size nare high flow nasal cannula with conventional high flow nasal cannula in extubated patients in intensive care unit in a randomised crossover trial. The comparison will include arterial blood gasses, physiological data including heart rate, respiratory rate, saturations as well as comfort and tolerance of the patients to two size nare high flow nasal cannuale.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2023

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

March 24, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Blood gasses (PaO2 in mmHg)

    To compare if there is difference in PaO2 between two nare and connventional high flow nasal cannula.

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

  • Blood gasses (PaCO2 in mmHg)

    To compare if there is difference in PaCO2 between two nare and connventional high flow nasal cannula.

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

  • Blood gasses (SaO2 percentage)

    To compare if there is difference in SaO2 between two nare and connventional high flow nasal cannula.

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • blood pressure (mmHg)

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

  • Respiratory rate (breaths per minute)

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

  • Tolerance as assessed by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0-4.

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

  • Comfort as assessed by a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1-5.

    30 minutes each for a total of one hour.

Study Arms (2)

Two Nare (Duet) high flow nasal cannula

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Recently a new mode of high flow oxygen therapy has presented on the market where the cannula of high flow have different diameters. Left cannula larger in diameter than the right. These two-nare size high flow nasal cannula are capable of delivering gases at a flow rate of 15-60 L/min, similar to the conventional HFNP but the difference in the diameters provide different levels of positive pressure as compared to conventional HFNP. The two nare nasal cannula will be used for 30 minutes to assess the gas exchange, hemodynamic parameters, the tolerance and comfort of the device to the patient.

Device: Two nare high flow nasal cannula

Conventional High flow nasal cannula

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Conventional high flow nasal cannula that has been used for many years will be compared with two-nare high flow nasal cannula. The two nare nasal cannula will be used for 30 minutes to assess the gas exchange, hemodynamic parameters, the tolerance and comfort of the device to the patient.

Device: Two nare high flow nasal cannula

Interventions

Recently a new mode of high flow oxygen therapy has presented on the market where the prongs of high flow have different diameters .These two-nare size high flow nasal cannula are capable of delivering gases at a flow rate of 15-50 L/min, similar to the conventional HFNP but the difference in the diameters provide different levels of positive pressure as compared to conventional HFNP.

Conventional High flow nasal cannulaTwo Nare (Duet) high flow nasal cannula

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All intubated patients imminently requiring extubation with family consent for admittance into the trial that meet the follow criteria:
  • P/F ratio between \> 150 prior to extubation
  • Has a functional arterial catheter to allow sample of arterial blood gasses.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients being extubated due to withdrawal of therapy Patients being extubated, that are expected to imminently die post extubation P/F Ratio :\< 150 Patients extubated on to non-invasive ventilation Patients with known epistaxis or nasal surgery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Frankston Hospital

Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Tiruvoipati R, Reddy MP, Paul E, Gupta S, Subramaniam A, Zhang D, Haji K. A comparison of conventional high-flow nasal cannula vs the duet high-flow nasal cannula in extubated patients: a randomized crossover trial. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Mar 26;30(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02447-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hypoxia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • RAVINDRANATH TIRUVOIPATI, PhD

    Peninsula Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2024

First Posted

May 3, 2024

Study Start

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion

September 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Locations