Hip Abductor Tendon Repair Versus Sham Surgery
Open Surgical Reconstruction Versus Open Sham Surgery in the Treatment of Hip Abductor Tendon Tears; A Double Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine the effectiveness of open surgical reconstruction in the treatment of patients with hip abductor tendon tears. Patients will be randomly allocated to either the open surgical reconstruction or to a open surgical sham procedure. The primary outcome is patient reported pain measured by the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), which will be conducted pre-surgery and at three and six months post-surgery. The six-month follow-up is the primary endpoint.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2027
May 3, 2024
April 1, 2024
2.2 years
April 30, 2024
April 30, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Differences in changes in patient-reported pain measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
The subscale "pain" on HAGOS measures the patients perception of hip and/or groin pain. It consist of ten items. A score from 0 to 100 is calculated, where a higher score is indicating lower pain.
From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Differences in changes in patient-reported symptoms measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up.
Differences in changes in patient-reported physical function in daily living (ADL) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up.
Differences in changes in patient-reported physical function in sport and recreational activities (sport/recreation) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up.
Differences in changes in patient-reported participation in physical activities (PA) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up.
Differences in changes in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) measured with the revised Copenhagen Hip And Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) (continuous data)
From baseline to 6-months post-surgery follow-up. The outcome is also conducted at 3-months post-surgery follow-up.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
rHat-group
EXPERIMENTALSurgical reconstruction of hip abductor tendon tear
SHAM-group
SHAM COMPARATORSham surgery of hip abductor tendon tear
Interventions
If the patient is allocated to surgical reconstruction, the incision from the sham surgery is continued into the iliotibial band (ITB) and down to the hip abductor tendon complex/greater trochanter. A standardized reconstruction of the HAT with bone anchors is then performed. This standardized procedure has been used by the surgeons for the last 6 years. The ITB is then closed with looped suture, the subcutaneous tissue sutured with standard resorbable single sutures, the skin stapled and a standard wound dressing is applied.
If the patient is allocated to sham surgery, the incision will only include the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Subsequently, the subcutaneous tissue will be sutured with standard resorbable single sutures, the skin stapled and a standard wound dressing applied. The patient will be kept in general anesthesia for 10 minutes after the procedure is finalized to mimic a true intervention (to hinder staff or relatives to comment on the duration of the procedure). The normal standard procedure takes approximately 40 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with an MRI verified hip abductor tendon pathology
- Age 30 years or above
- Lateral hip pain for more than 12 months
- Ability to understand written and verbal Danish
You may not qualify if:
- Previous hip joint replacement, pelvic osteomies, hip abductor tendon surgery, femoral nailing or iliotibial band surgery
- Pregnancy
- Osteoarthritis of the hip joint on the affected side (Kellgren Lawrence grade +2)
- Rheumatoid disorders
- Inability to attend planned follow-up visits
- Having an ongoing occupational injury insurance case
- Expected lack of compliance due to cognitive issues, alcohol, or drug abuse
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Horsens Hospitallead
- University of Aarhuscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Horsens Regional Hospital
Horsens, 8700, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mathias Høgsholt, PT, PhD.st.
Horsens Regional Hospital; Aarhus University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jeppe Lange, MD, PhD
Horsens Regional Hospital; Aarhus University
- STUDY CHAIR
Signe Kierkegaard-Brøchner, PhD
Regionshospitalet Horsens
- STUDY CHAIR
Kristian Thorborg, PhD
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
- STUDY CHAIR
Marie Bagger Bohn, MD, PhD
Regionshospitalet Horsens
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Patients are allocated when in full general anesthesia. Treatment allocation will be blinded in the electronic patient journal, as the surgeon will insert a general description of the surgery. Unblinding at 6 months at the final consultation with the orthopedic surgeon. At the day of the unblinding the patient will be tested in the Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy before the consultation with the orthopedic surgeon.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2024
First Posted
May 3, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
February 1, 2027
Last Updated
May 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- Immediately following publication and ending 5 years following primary article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Proposals should be directed to mathhg@rm.dk. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
What data will be shared: All quantitative individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification, and according to current Danish Data Protection Regulation and GDPR. With whom will data be shared: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal. For what types of analyses: To achieve aims in the approved proposal. The abovementioned is based on Data Sharing Statements for Clinical Trial: A Requirement of the ICMJE located at: https://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/data\_sharing\_june\_2017.pdf