Cryotherapy Reduces Time to Surgery and Local Complication in Patients With Ankle Fractures
Cryotherapy
Third Generation Cryotherapy Reduces Time to Surgery and Local Complication in Patients With Ankle Fractures: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
169
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Ankle fractures are common injuries and cryotherapy is routinely used to reduce pain, swelling and local skin complications, both before and after surgery. However, the results on ankle surgery are contradictory. Despite the benefits of cryotherapy in the pre- and postoperative care of ankle surgery, lack of standardized protocols and few level-1 studies make difficult to appreciate the effectiveness. In addition, there's scarce evidence on the benefits from the preoperative use of cryotherapy. The aim of this study is to report the results with the use of third generation cryotherapy in the preoperative treatment of ankle fractures. Third generation devices use computed cryotherapy to deliver gradual changes in pressure and temperature. The software produces a progressive drop in temperature and a controlled slow return to room temperature environment, avoiding reactive vasodilation. Time to surgery, pain, opioids intake, and local skin complications have been investigated. Methods 169 patients with ankle fracture were randomized in two groups, the cryotherapy group (89 patients) and the control group (C: 80 patients). The time-to- surgery, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the analgesic drug demand (including morphine or acetaminophen) were recorded. The development of skin complications was assessed daily. BMI and number of cigarettes smoked were also recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2024
CompletedMay 2, 2024
April 1, 2024
2.5 years
April 24, 2024
April 29, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
time to surgery
hours
From enrollment to surgery
Secondary Outcomes (3)
VAS Score
6 hours
Skin complications
up to surgery
Morphine intake
up to surgery
Study Arms (2)
Cryotherapy
EXPERIMENTALPatients were treated with a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) which was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The leg was immobilized in a walking boot which was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.
Immobilization and elevation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe leg was immobilized into a half cats and elevation of the injured limb was indicated before surgery.
Interventions
Treatment group: the ankle was immobilized in a walking boot, then a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The walking boot was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients admitted to the emergency department with an ankle fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Open fractures
- Fracture-dislocations which required external fixation
- Patients with one or more associated fractures
- Patients with a diagnose of major trauma
- Patients who were not able to complain with the pre- and post-surgical indications
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
A.O. San Camillo Forlanini
Rome, 00152, Italy
A.O. San camillo Forlanini
Rome, Italy
Related Publications (8)
Herrera E, Sandoval MC, Camargo DM, Salvini TF. Motor and sensory nerve conduction are affected differently by ice pack, ice massage, and cold water immersion. Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;90(4):581-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090131. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20185615RESULTHelmerhorst GT, Lindenhovius AL, Vrahas M, Ring D, Kloen P. Satisfaction with pain relief after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1958-61. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
PMID: 22901424RESULTWilke B, Weiner RD. Postoperative cryotherapy: risks versus benefits of continuous-flow cryotherapy units. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2003 Apr;20(2):307-22. doi: 10.1016/S0891-8422(03)00009-0.
PMID: 12776983RESULTDouzi W, Guillot X, Bon D, Seguin F, Boildieu N, Wendling D, Tordi N, Dupuy O, Dugue B. 1H-NMR-Based Analysis for Exploring Knee Synovial Fluid Metabolite Changes after Local Cryotherapy in Knee Arthritis Patients. Metabolites. 2020 Nov 13;10(11):460. doi: 10.3390/metabo10110460.
PMID: 33202890RESULTDe Boer AS, Van Lieshout EMM, Van Moolenbroek G, Verhofstad MHJ, Den Hartog D. Computer-Controlled Cooling in Operatively Treated Ankle or Hindfoot Fractures: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec;60(6):1131-1136. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
PMID: 34039509RESULTScheer RC, Newman JM, Zhou JJ, Oommen AJ, Naziri Q, Shah NV, Pascal SC, Penny GS, McKean JM, Tsai J, Uribe JA. Ankle Fracture Epidemiology in the United States: Patient-Related Trends and Mechanisms of Injury. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 May-Jun;59(3):479-483. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.016.
PMID: 32354504RESULTLin S, Xie J, Yao X, Dai Z, Wu W. The Use of Cryotherapy for the Prevention of Wound Complications in the Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 May-Jun;57(3):436-439. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.002.
PMID: 29685558RESULTFinger A, Teunis T, Hageman MG, Ziady ER, Ring D, Heng M. Association Between Opioid Intake and Disability After Surgical Management of Ankle Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Jul;25(7):519-526. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00505.
PMID: 28574942RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Gennaro Pipino, M.D., Prof.
San Raffaele University, Milan
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., Orthopaedic Sugeon, principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2024
First Posted
May 2, 2024
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 1, 2023
Study Completion
February 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 2, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- the will be available with the published manuscript, or by asking to the corresponding author under reasonable request with no time restriction
- Access Criteria
- contacting the corresponding author (Alessio Giai Via) by e-mail
all IPD collected throughout the trial