NCT06396364

Brief Summary

Ankle fractures are common injuries and cryotherapy is routinely used to reduce pain, swelling and local skin complications, both before and after surgery. However, the results on ankle surgery are contradictory. Despite the benefits of cryotherapy in the pre- and postoperative care of ankle surgery, lack of standardized protocols and few level-1 studies make difficult to appreciate the effectiveness. In addition, there's scarce evidence on the benefits from the preoperative use of cryotherapy. The aim of this study is to report the results with the use of third generation cryotherapy in the preoperative treatment of ankle fractures. Third generation devices use computed cryotherapy to deliver gradual changes in pressure and temperature. The software produces a progressive drop in temperature and a controlled slow return to room temperature environment, avoiding reactive vasodilation. Time to surgery, pain, opioids intake, and local skin complications have been investigated. Methods 169 patients with ankle fracture were randomized in two groups, the cryotherapy group (89 patients) and the control group (C: 80 patients). The time-to- surgery, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the analgesic drug demand (including morphine or acetaminophen) were recorded. The development of skin complications was assessed daily. BMI and number of cigarettes smoked were also recorded.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
169

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2021

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

cryotherapyankle fractureankle surgerytime to surgerysurgical site infections

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • time to surgery

    hours

    From enrollment to surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • VAS Score

    6 hours

  • Skin complications

    up to surgery

  • Morphine intake

    up to surgery

Study Arms (2)

Cryotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients were treated with a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) which was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The leg was immobilized in a walking boot which was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.

Device: Cryotherapy

Immobilization and elevation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The leg was immobilized into a half cats and elevation of the injured limb was indicated before surgery.

Device: Cryotherapy

Interventions

Treatment group: the ankle was immobilized in a walking boot, then a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The walking boot was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied.

Also known as: Third generation cryotherapy
CryotherapyImmobilization and elevation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients admitted to the emergency department with an ankle fracture

You may not qualify if:

  • Open fractures
  • Fracture-dislocations which required external fixation
  • Patients with one or more associated fractures
  • Patients with a diagnose of major trauma
  • Patients who were not able to complain with the pre- and post-surgical indications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

A.O. San Camillo Forlanini

Rome, 00152, Italy

Location

A.O. San camillo Forlanini

Rome, Italy

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Herrera E, Sandoval MC, Camargo DM, Salvini TF. Motor and sensory nerve conduction are affected differently by ice pack, ice massage, and cold water immersion. Phys Ther. 2010 Apr;90(4):581-91. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090131. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

  • Helmerhorst GT, Lindenhovius AL, Vrahas M, Ring D, Kloen P. Satisfaction with pain relief after operative treatment of an ankle fracture. Injury. 2012 Nov;43(11):1958-61. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.018. Epub 2012 Aug 16.

  • Wilke B, Weiner RD. Postoperative cryotherapy: risks versus benefits of continuous-flow cryotherapy units. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2003 Apr;20(2):307-22. doi: 10.1016/S0891-8422(03)00009-0.

  • Douzi W, Guillot X, Bon D, Seguin F, Boildieu N, Wendling D, Tordi N, Dupuy O, Dugue B. 1H-NMR-Based Analysis for Exploring Knee Synovial Fluid Metabolite Changes after Local Cryotherapy in Knee Arthritis Patients. Metabolites. 2020 Nov 13;10(11):460. doi: 10.3390/metabo10110460.

  • De Boer AS, Van Lieshout EMM, Van Moolenbroek G, Verhofstad MHJ, Den Hartog D. Computer-Controlled Cooling in Operatively Treated Ankle or Hindfoot Fractures: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2021 Nov-Dec;60(6):1131-1136. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021.04.014. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

  • Scheer RC, Newman JM, Zhou JJ, Oommen AJ, Naziri Q, Shah NV, Pascal SC, Penny GS, McKean JM, Tsai J, Uribe JA. Ankle Fracture Epidemiology in the United States: Patient-Related Trends and Mechanisms of Injury. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020 May-Jun;59(3):479-483. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.016.

  • Lin S, Xie J, Yao X, Dai Z, Wu W. The Use of Cryotherapy for the Prevention of Wound Complications in the Treatment of Calcaneal Fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 May-Jun;57(3):436-439. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.08.002.

  • Finger A, Teunis T, Hageman MG, Ziady ER, Ring D, Heng M. Association Between Opioid Intake and Disability After Surgical Management of Ankle Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Jul;25(7):519-526. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00505.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ankle FracturesSurgical Wound Infection

Interventions

Cryotherapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fractures, BoneWounds and InjuriesAnkle InjuriesLeg InjuriesWound InfectionInfectionsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Therapeutics

Study Officials

  • Gennaro Pipino, M.D., Prof.

    San Raffaele University, Milan

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients were randomized in two groups at the time of the diagnosis in the emergency department. The treatment group (T: 89 patients) were treated with a third-generation cryotherapy device (Z- One®, Zamar) which was applied daily for 2 hours two times a day up to the day of surgery. The leg was immobilized in a walking boot which was removed when the cryotherapy device was applied. The control group (C: 80 patients) did not use cryotherapy before surgery, the leg was immobilized into a half cats and elevation of the injured limb was indicated. Pain was evaluated according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the analgesic drug demand (including morphine or acetaminophen). The Bod
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D., Orthopaedic Sugeon, principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2024

First Posted

May 2, 2024

Study Start

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion

August 1, 2023

Study Completion

February 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

all IPD collected throughout the trial

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
the will be available with the published manuscript, or by asking to the corresponding author under reasonable request with no time restriction
Access Criteria
contacting the corresponding author (Alessio Giai Via) by e-mail
More information

Locations