NCT06393829

Brief Summary

Insufficient mobility contributes to functional decline in hospitalized cardiac patients. Early mobilization programs were shown to improve functional status, increase the likelihood of home discharges, and reduce the length of stay \[1\]. Therefore, there is a need to adapt and implement early mobilization programs in Quebec hospitals. The overall goal of this study is to adapt and implement an early mobilization program in the Cardiovascular units of the Jewish General Hospital (JGH).

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
350

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable cardiovascular-diseases

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jun 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress93%
Jun 2024Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2024

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 1, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

March 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Early mobilization programcardiovascularLevel of mobility

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (9)

  • Number of implementation strategies developed to overcome the identified individual and organizational barriers and leverage the facilitators to implement an early mobilization program in this hospital setting.

    Investigators will develop strategies to overcome identified barriers and leverage the facilitators to implement the early mobilization program using data obtained from a mixed methods repeated measures design, including: A) Shadowing: an observational grid will be developed, including frequency of mobilization, length of mobilization activity, Health care professionals (HCPs) performing mobilization intervention, type of mobilization intervention, patient and caregiver acceptance and reaction, environmental barriers, available equipment, communication strategies among HCPs, reporting of mobilization interventions in the medical charts, clinicians' comment and observers' impressions and thoughts. B) HCPs will be invited to respond to a survey and participate in a focus group to assess perceived barriers and facilitators to early mobilization. C) Patients and caregivers will participate in a focus group to better understand barriers and facilitators to early mobilization.

    3 months

  • Number of patients mobilized divided by the total number of admitted patients during the evaluation period.

    Reach of the early mobilization program among patients will be measured with the following indicator: the number of patients mobilized (defined as the patient not being in bed during direct observation) divided by the total number of admitted patients during the evaluation period.

    3 months

  • Number of Patients refused being mobilized compared to number of admited patients during the evaluation period.

    Acceptability of the early mobilization program among patients will be measured with the refusal rate of being mobilized using the site's administrative data and a file audit that will include a form developed for this purpose.

    3 months

  • Number of days between admission and the development of a mobilization plan, between admission and first mobilization and number of patients with at least 3 mobilizations per day per week.

    Fidelity of intervention among HCPs will be measured with the following indicators: * Number of days between admission and the development of a mobilization plan * Number of days between admission and first mobilization * Number of patients with at least 3 mobilizations per day per week.

    3 months

  • Change in mobility levels during the unit's stay.

    Change in in mobility levels according to the LOF mobility scaleoccurring during the unit's stay.

    3 months

  • Change in number of Pressure ulcers occurance in the unit during the evaluation period.

    Change in Pressure ulcers rate in the unit during the evaluation period.

    3 months

  • Number of fall incidents occurring in the unit' during the evaluation period.

    Change in rate of falls occurring in the unit' during the evaluation period.

    3 months

  • Change in Length of stay

    Change in organizational outcomes measured by change in number of days the patient stay in the hospital.

    3 months

  • Number of patients discharged to home versus number discharged to an institutional care.

    Number of patients discharged to home versus number discharged to an institutional care used to evaluate the Effect of early monbilization on the discharge destination (home or institutional care).

    3 months

Study Arms (3)

pre-implementation

NO INTERVENTION

The proportion of patients mobilized pre-intervention period

Implementation

EXPERIMENTAL

The proportion of patients mobilized during the intervention implementation period

Behavioral: Applying the Early Mobilization Program

Post-implementation

NO INTERVENTION

The proportion of patients mobilized post-intervention period

Interventions

A mobilization intervention based on the level of function (LOF) ( i.e. patients should be assessed for mobilization status within 24 hours of admission; mobilization should occur at least three times a day, and mobility should be progressive and scaled, tailored to the patient's abilities); The frequency of patient mobilization (primary outcome) will be assessed 20 weeks before implementation, during the 20 weeks of implementation and 20 weeks after the end of implementation (60 weeks in total).

Implementation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All healthcare professionals working in the cardiovascular unit at the Jewish General Hospital.
  • All patients admitted to the cardiovascular unit at the Jewish General Hospital.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who don't speak English or French.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal/Centre de rech interdisciplinaire en réadaptation du Montréal métropolitain

Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1M9, Canada

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Anekwe DE, Biswas S, Bussieres A, Spahija J. Early rehabilitation reduces the likelihood of developing intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2020 Jun;107:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.004. Epub 2019 Dec 19.

    PMID: 32135387BACKGROUND
  • Dima D, Valiquette J, Berube-Dufour J, Goldfarb M. Level of function mobility scale for nurse-driven early mobilisation in people with acute cardiovascular disease. J Clin Nurs. 2020 Mar;29(5-6):778-784. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15124. Epub 2019 Dec 18.

    PMID: 31793086BACKGROUND
  • Castro-Avila AC, Seron P, Fan E, Gaete M, Mickan S. Effect of Early Rehabilitation during Intensive Care Unit Stay on Functional Status: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 1;10(7):e0130722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130722. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26132803BACKGROUND
  • TEAM Study Investigators; Hodgson C, Bellomo R, Berney S, Bailey M, Buhr H, Denehy L, Harrold M, Higgins A, Presneill J, Saxena M, Skinner E, Young P, Webb S. Early mobilization and recovery in mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a bi-national, multi-centre, prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 26;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0765-4.

    PMID: 25715872BACKGROUND
  • Zanni JM, Korupolu R, Fan E, Pradhan P, Janjua K, Palmer JB, Brower RG, Needham DM. Rehabilitation therapy and outcomes in acute respiratory failure: an observational pilot project. J Crit Care. 2010 Jun;25(2):254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2009.10.010. Epub 2009 Nov 26.

    PMID: 19942399BACKGROUND
  • Dubb R, Nydahl P, Hermes C, Schwabbauer N, Toonstra A, Parker AM, Kaltwasser A, Needham DM. Barriers and Strategies for Early Mobilization of Patients in Intensive Care Units. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 May;13(5):724-30. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201509-586CME.

    PMID: 27144796BACKGROUND
  • Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.

    PMID: 16557505BACKGROUND
  • Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.

    PMID: 25895742BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Sara Ahmed

    McGill univeristy

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The proposed project will follow the steps of the Knowledge-to-Action framework (KTA) \[7\]. The KTA is a process model that provides practical guidance in planning and implementing research evidence into practice \[8\]. It is comprised of a Knowledge Creation Funnel and an Action Cycle. Our project will follow the steps of the Action Cycle from adapting to the local context through evaluating outcomes with a concern for sustaining knowledge use.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2024

First Posted

May 1, 2024

Study Start

June 1, 2024

Primary Completion

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

The research assistant will de-identify the participants by generating a random code using a statistical method. The research team will extract and transfer the data using a password-protected Excel spreadsheet where modification is traceable. The private information (participant personal information, i.e., name, birth date) will be coded (unique code for each participant). The data capturing, coding, and analysis will be conducted on a password-protected computer at Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation center connected to a secured server.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Data, informed consent forms, and questionnaires completed by patients and health care professionals will be stored at the Constance Lethbridge Rehabilitation Center on the institution's secure server by the researcher in charge of the study for ten years after the end of the project after which they will be permanently destroyed.
Access Criteria
A research assistant and a statistician will analyze and code the de-identified research data under the supervision of Sara Ahmed and Diana Zidarov, the two principal investigators. These people will have access to the data for analytical purposes.

Locations