Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy for Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy to Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (SBRT) Versus Conventional Palliative Radiotherapy (CRT) for Participants With Painful Non-Spine Bone Metastases
1 other identifier
interventional
230
1 country
7
Brief Summary
This study is being done to answer the following question: Is Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy or SBRT (a form of radiation therapy which can deliver high doses of radiation to the specific painful area of the body most affected by cancer, while keeping the radiation beams away from the healthy parts of the body that surround the cancer) better for pain relief than the standard treatment of conventional radiation therapy or CRT (a form of radiation therapy which delivers radiation to the painful area but can also negatively affect other parts of the body in the same area)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Mar 2025
Typical duration for phase_3
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
March 27, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.3 years
April 17, 2024
March 24, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete pain response utilizing the Cochran-Mantel-Hanzeal test
27 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Pain response pattern at 3 months: partial, stable or progressive pain
27 months
Early (1 month post RT) and late (6 months post RT) CPR and response patterns (partial, stable, and progressive pain);
27 months
Re-irradiation rate within the 6-month follow-up period
27 months
Incidence of fracture at the radiation target site
27 months
Incidence of treatment-related AE rates >/- grade 2 utilizing CTCAE v5
27 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Conventional Radiotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORStereotactic Body Radiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologic confirmation of solid tumour.
- Patient with a dominant painful non-spine bone metastasis and a worst minimum pain score of 2 using the BPI attributed to that dominant site
- Expected overall survival of greater than 6 months as determined by the treating physician
- Suitable for protocol defined SBRT and CRT.
- Stable pain with no immediate plan to alter analgesic regimen.
- ECOG performance status of 0-2.
- Participant consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirements. Each participant must sign a consent form prior to enrolment in the trial to document their willingness to participate
You may not qualify if:
- Metastases of the hands, feet, cranium or spine (including sacrum) as the dominant/index pain site.
- Bone metastasis arising from a small cell or germ cell.
- Radionuclide therapy within 30 days of randomization.
- Patient treated with prior palliative RT to the dominant painful bone metastasis site (prior radiation exposure is permitted if prior to development of the dominant metastasis and would not influence the applicability of either treatment arm of the current study).
- Received systemic chemotherapy within 1 week of the protocol RT, or who are expected/planned to receive chemotherapy within one week of completing protocol RT.
- Participants with an unstable pathologic fracture at the dominant painful bone metastasis, or for whom surgical fixation would be the preferred intervention if possible.
- Pregnant or lactating individuals.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
Kingston Health Sciences Centre
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre Research Inc.
London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada
Stronach Regional Health Centre at Southlake
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 2P9, Canada
Odette Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
CHUM-Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4, Canada
Hotel-Dieu de Quebec
Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Arjun Sahgal
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- STUDY CHAIR
Tim Nguyen
London Regional Cancer Program, London, ON, Canada
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2024
First Posted
April 30, 2024
Study Start
March 7, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share