NCT06389253

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the effect of subtalar extra-articular calcaneo-stop screw on the proprioceptive and nociceptive pathways of the ankle before and after implantation. The hypothesis of the study is that an increased number of receptors related to proprioception will be detected in the sinus tarsi.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 24, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 29, 2024

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

May 1, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 24, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 29, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Endpoint (%)

    Percentage of patients presenting at least one proprioceptive fibers in the pericapsular tissue

    Time 0 (baseline)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Secondary Endpoint

    Time 0 (baseline)

Study Arms (2)

Control Group

Control group are patients that will insert the calcaneo-stop screw (age between 10 and 14 years old).

Other: Histological Analysis

Study Group

Study group are patient that remove the calcaneo-stop screw (age from 14 years old)

Other: Histological Analysis

Interventions

For the study, a minimal part of the periarticular tissue, specifically the sinus tarsi juxta-articular fatty tissue, that is normally dissected and discarded during the surgical operation of insertion and removal of the calcaneo-stop screw, will be analyzed

Control GroupStudy Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with subtalar extraarticular screw arthroereisis, gender male and female, no comorbidities. Control group are patients that will insert the calcaneo-stop screw (age between 10 and 14 years old). Study group are patient that remove the calcaneo-stop screw (age from 14 years old)

You may qualify if:

  • Study Group:
  • Patients aged 14 years old and above that will remove the calcaneo stop screw, in place for at least 3 years after the implant, will be recruited
  • Patients willing and able to give informed consent for the participation in the study. For underage patients, a parent/legal representative will give consent for the participation in the study.
  • Male and female patients in fertile age can be recruited.
  • Control Group:
  • Syndromic patients
  • Previous foot malformation (synostosis, congenital clubfoot)
  • Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Control Group:
  • Syndromic patients
  • Previous foot malformation (synostosis, congenital clubfoot)
  • Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
  • Study Group:
  • Patients suffering from post-operative complications
  • Syndromic patients
  • Previous foot malformation (synostosis, congenital clubfoot)
  • Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Ircss Ospedale San Raffaele

Milan, Lombardy, 20149, Italy

Location

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

Milan, 20132, Italy

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • De Pellegrin M, Moharamzadeh D. Subtalar Arthroereisis for Surgical Treatment of Flexible Flatfoot. Foot Ankle Clin. 2021 Dec;26(4):765-805. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2021.07.007. Epub 2021 Oct 4.

    PMID: 34752238BACKGROUND
  • Michaudet C, Edenfield KM, Nicolette GW, Carek PJ. Foot and Ankle Conditions: Pes Planus. FP Essent. 2018 Feb;465:18-23.

    PMID: 29381041BACKGROUND
  • Mosca VS. Flexible flatfoot in children and adolescents. J Child Orthop. 2010 Apr;4(2):107-21. doi: 10.1007/s11832-010-0239-9. Epub 2010 Feb 18.

    PMID: 21455468BACKGROUND
  • Harris EJ. The natural history and pathophysiology of flexible flatfoot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2010 Jan;27(1):1-23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2009.09.002.

    PMID: 19963167BACKGROUND
  • Jane MacKenzie A, Rome K, Evans AM. The efficacy of nonsurgical interventions for pediatric flexible flat foot: a critical review. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Dec;32(8):830-4. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3182648c95.

    PMID: 23147627BACKGROUND
  • De Pellegrin M, Moharamzadeh D, Strobl WM, Biedermann R, Tschauner C, Wirth T. Subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) for the treatment of flexible flatfoot in children. J Child Orthop. 2014 Dec;8(6):479-87. doi: 10.1007/s11832-014-0619-7. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

    PMID: 25413354BACKGROUND
  • Rein S, Manthey S, Zwipp H, Witt A. Distribution of sensory nerve endings around the human sinus tarsi: a cadaver study. J Anat. 2014 Apr;224(4):499-508. doi: 10.1111/joa.12157. Epub 2014 Jan 29.

    PMID: 24472004BACKGROUND
  • Freeman MA, Wyke B. The innervation of the knee joint. An anatomical and histological study in the cat. J Anat. 1967 Jun;101(Pt 3):505-32. No abstract available.

    PMID: 6051731BACKGROUND
  • Hagert E, Forsgren S, Ljung BO. Differences in the presence of mechanoreceptors and nerve structures between wrist ligaments may imply differential roles in wrist stabilization. J Orthop Res. 2005 Jul;23(4):757-63. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.011. Epub 2005 Mar 29.

    PMID: 16022987BACKGROUND
  • Hagert E. Proprioception of the wrist joint: a review of current concepts and possible implications on the rehabilitation of the wrist. J Hand Ther. 2010 Jan-Mar;23(1):2-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.008. Epub 2009 Dec 5.

    PMID: 19963343BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Flatfoot

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TalipesFoot Deformities, AcquiredFoot DeformitiesMusculoskeletal DiseasesFoot Deformities, CongenitalLower Extremity Deformities, CongenitalLimb Deformities, CongenitalMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2024

First Posted

April 29, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion

May 1, 2025

Last Updated

May 1, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations