Effectiveness of Cervical Osteopathic Manipulation in Patients with Whiplash
1 other identifier
interventional
129
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine the mid- and long-term efficiency (15, 30 and 120 days after starting sessions) of the SAT technique in patients with grade II acute WL, comparing it with a conventional rehabilitation program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2024
CompletedFebruary 7, 2025
May 1, 2024
5 months
April 24, 2024
February 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Subjective pain intensity
Neck pain intensity was assessed with a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure the amount of pain experienced by a subject from both groups on a continuum from 0 to 100 mm. Scores can range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain)19,20. This method has been proven to be a reliable, generalizable and internally consistent measure of clinical and experimental neck pain
At baseline and at week 2, 4 and follow-up.
Neck specific disability
Neck-specific disability was measured with Neck Disability Index (NDI). The NDI is a valid measurement of disability in neck pain disorders. It is widely used and it has shown good reliability and validity in WAD studies. NDI scores can range from 0% (no limitation on activity) to 100% (worst possible disability).
At baseline and at week 2, 4 and follow-up.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cervical range of motion (CROM)
At baseline and at week 2 and week 4.
Cervical lordosis Cobb angle
At baseline and at week 4.
Hospital anxiety and depression scale
At baseline and at week 4 and follow-up.
Study Arms (2)
Experimental: MAN Group
EXPERIMENTALMAN-Group were treated with cervical spine manipulation with SAT. Patients received a total of 3 sessions of treatment over a month (days 1, 15 and 30 after the beginning of the study).
MAN Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORMAN-Group were treated with cervical spine manipulation with SAT. Patients received a total of 3 sessions of treatment over a month (days 1, 15 and 30 after the beginning of the study).
Interventions
The RHB-group were treated with passive manual therapy (P-MT) by soft tissue mobilization, massage and muscular stretching of the anterior and posterior cervical muscles; active therapeutic exercises (A-TE); and oculo-cervical exercises (OC-E). Patients received a total of 20 sessions of 30 minutes each during 4 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients between 18-60 years of age Who went to the emergency service after suffering a traffic car collision being the driver of the car.
- With acute WL grade II WAD diagnosis, made by physicians from the traumatology service (with neck pain by whiplash trauma with objective findings but no radiculopathy).
- Referred to the hospital rehabilitation service
You may not qualify if:
- Any other symptomatology different to neck pain and other coexisting medical conditions which could severely restrict participation in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa.
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08227, Spain
Related Publications (15)
Peolsson A, Landen Ludvigsson M, Tigerfors AM, Peterson G. Effects of Neck-Specific Exercises Compared to Waiting List for Individuals With Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorders: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Feb;97(2):189-95. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.087. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
PMID: 26514296BACKGROUNDDe Rosario H, Vivas MJ, Sinovas MI, Page A. Relationship between neck motion and self-reported pain in patients with whiplash associated disorders during the acute phase. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2018 Dec;38:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
PMID: 30218881BACKGROUNDRasmussen C, Stenager E, Nielsen CV. [Social, economic and cultural aspects of whiplash syndrome]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Jun 14;172(24):1815-7. Danish.
PMID: 20566153BACKGROUNDWalton DM, Elliott JM. An Integrated Model of Chronic Whiplash-Associated Disorder. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017 Jul;47(7):462-471. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7455. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
PMID: 28622487BACKGROUNDSpitzer WO, Skovron ML, Salmi LR, Cassidy JD, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E. Scientific monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: redefining "whiplash" and its management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Apr 15;20(8 Suppl):1S-73S. No abstract available.
PMID: 7604354BACKGROUNDWiangkham T, Duda J, Haque S, Madi M, Rushton A. The Effectiveness of Conservative Management for Acute Whiplash Associated Disorder (WAD) II: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0133415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133415. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26196127BACKGROUND7. Regal Ramos, R.J. Síndrome de latigazo cervical: Características epidemiológicas de los pacientes evaluados en la unidad médica de valoración de incapacidades de Madrid. Medicina y Seguridad del Trabajo 225:348-360 (2011).
BACKGROUNDPajediene E, Janusauskaite J, Samusyte G, Stasaitis K, Petrikonis K, Bileviciute-Ljungar I. Patterns of acute whiplash-associated disorder in the Lithuanian population after road traffic accidents. J Rehabil Med. 2015 Jan;47(1):52-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1892.
PMID: 25315016BACKGROUNDPeolsson A, Landen Ludvigsson M, Peterson G. Neck-specific exercises with internet-based support compared to neck-specific exercises at a physiotherapy clinic for chronic whiplash-associated disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled multicentre trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Dec 12;18(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1853-1.
PMID: 29233141BACKGROUNDPeterson G, Dedering A, Andersson E, Nilsson D, Trygg J, Peolsson M, Wallman T, Peolsson A. Altered ventral neck muscle deformation for individuals with whiplash associated disorder compared to healthy controls - a case-control ultrasound study. Man Ther. 2015 Apr;20(2):319-27. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
PMID: 25454684BACKGROUNDPeolsson A, Karlsson A, Ghafouri B, Ebbers T, Engstrom M, Jonsson M, Wahlen K, Romu T, Borga M, Kristjansson E, Bahat HS, German D, Zsigmond P, Peterson G. Pathophysiology behind prolonged whiplash associated disorders: study protocol for an experimental study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Feb 2;20(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2433-3.
PMID: 30711003BACKGROUNDElkin BS, Elliott JM, Siegmund GP. Whiplash Injury or Concussion? A Possible Biomechanical Explanation for Concussion Symptoms in Some Individuals Following a Rear-End Collision. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;46(10):874-885. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.7049.
PMID: 27690834BACKGROUNDChurch EW, Sieg EP, Zalatimo O, Hussain NS, Glantz M, Harbaugh RE. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Chiropractic Care and Cervical Artery Dissection: No Evidence for Causation. Cureus. 2016 Feb 16;8(2):e498. doi: 10.7759/cureus.498.
PMID: 27014532BACKGROUNDHaldeman S, Carroll L, Cassidy JD, Schubert J, Nygren A. The Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders: executive summary. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2 Suppl):S7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.11.005. No abstract available.
PMID: 19251077BACKGROUNDGross A, Miller J, D'Sylva J, Burnie SJ, Goldsmith CH, Graham N, Haines T, Bronfort G, Hoving JL; COG. Manipulation or mobilisation for neck pain: a Cochrane Review. Man Ther. 2010 Aug;15(4):315-33. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.04.002. Epub 2010 May 26.
PMID: 20510644BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joan Parera-Turull, PhD.
Clinical Research Centre d'Osteopatia Terrassa. Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2024
First Posted
April 29, 2024
Study Start
May 1, 2024
Primary Completion
October 5, 2024
Study Completion
October 28, 2024
Last Updated
February 7, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share