Efficacy of Pain Intervention With Deep Brain Stimulation Neuromodulation
EPIONE
2 other identifiers
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if deep brain stimulation (DBS) works to treat severe pain following a stroke in adults. It will also learn about the safety of deep brain stimulation. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does DBS lower the pain score in these participants.
- What medical problems do participants have when having DBS? Researchers will compare different settings, to see if DBS works to treat severe post stroke pain. Participants will:
- Undergo baseline screening procedures and have an MRI scan.
- Have neurosurgery to put the DBS system in
- Have follow up for 10 months
- Visit the clinic at least 5 times in the study for check-ups and tests
- Fill in questionnaires about pain and mood and have check ups remotely
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
November 19, 2025
October 1, 2025
3.6 years
April 9, 2024
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
McGill Pain Questionnaire V2.0 -Short Form - Present Pain Intensity (MQ-SF-PPI) score
The SF-MPQ also includes the Present Pain Intensity (PPI) index of the standard MPQ
MQ-SF-PPI at end of Month 3 and Month 4: Comparison is between intervention (DBS ON vs DBS Pseudo-ON)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Baseline (pre-operatively), Pre-switch on, Randomisation month (weekly),'Crossover' (weekly), monthly during Optimisation to study end. Ad Hoc programming change, MPQ-SF PPI subscale recorded pre- and 30 mins post
McGill Pain Questionnaire V2.0 short form (MPQ-SF) McGill Pain Questionnaire V2.0 short form) MPQ-SF (McGill Pain Questionnaire V2.0 short form)
Baseline (pre-operatively), Pre-switch on, Randomisation month (weekly),'Crossover' (weekly), monthly during Optimisation to study end. Ad Hoc programming change, MPQ-SF PPI subscale recorded pre- and 30 mins post
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) - Short Form
Baseline (pre-operatively), post-operatively at months 2, 3, 7 and 10 (study end)
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI II)
Baseline (pre-operatively), post-operatively at months 2, 3, 7 and 10 (study end)
Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Post-operatively at months 2, 3, 7 and 10 (study end)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (3)
Heart rate variability (HRV)
Five 7 day periods: Pre-operatively and post-operatively at months 1, 2, 3, 7.
Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI)
Baseline (pre-operatively), post-operatively at months 2, and 7
MRI
Baseline (pre-operatively)
Study Arms (2)
Stimulation ON
ACTIVE COMPARATORON stimulation is a programme that on average provides pain relief to participants based on previous experience with DBS for pain. There will be some titration of stimulation, based on patient response. The setting with best acute pain relief will be the one chosen for the ON phase, with individual parameter settings up to a maximum of: Frequency up to 80 Hertz(Hz), Amplitude 6.0 milliamps(mA) and or Pulse Width 500 microseconds(uS). Duration of intervention: 1 month
Stimulation Pseudo-ON
SHAM COMPARATORPseudo-ON is a low power programme that provides sham stimulation (high frequency, low amplitude stimulation generally ineffective at providing pain relief) and drains battery over time, requiring the participant to recharge the IPG periodically: around 250Hz, less than 0.5mA (with potential to be as low as 0mA), 450uS. Duration of intervention: 1 month
Interventions
Neurostimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter and sensory thalamus at a level with potential to provide pain relief
Neurostimulation of the periaqueductal gray matter and sensory thalamus S at a low level, not designed to provide pain relief
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
- Willing and able to follow pre and post-operative procedures in Oxford.
- Aged 21 years or above.
- Diagnosed as having central post stroke pain of 2 years' minimum duration refractory to best medical/non-medical treatment
- Mean usual VAS (or NRS) pain score \> 6/10 despite input from a multidisciplinary pain team.
You may not qualify if:
- A patient will not be eligible for the trial if any of the following apply:
- Contraindication for elective general anaesthesia, for example but not limited to severe cardiovascular disease, hyponatraemia, hyperkalaemia, etc.
- Previous implantation of a DBS device with device still in situ.
- Contraindication to MRI
- Contraindication to neurosurgery, e.g. Bleeding disorders, not able to stop anticoagulation safely for perioperative phase (approx. 10 days, 5 days pre-operatively, 5 days postoperatively) Major psychiatric or cognitive disorder that may affect mental capacity that is untreated or may otherwise affect the participant's ability to engage in the trial
- Active skin-based infection or colonisation with a multi-drug resistant organism e.g. methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)
- Requires regular MRI investigations post-operatively
- Likely to require diathermy, ultrasound or transcranial magnetic stimulation post DBS device insertion
- Not tolerant of awake surgery
- Unable to cooperate with device recharging
- Pregnancy or planned pregnancy
- In the investigator's opinion unable to comply with the protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Oxfordlead
- Jon MoultonTrustcollaborator
- Placito Bequestcollaborator
- Bioinductioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
John Radcliffe Hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexander Green, MD, DPhil
Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Timothy Denison, PhD
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford OX3 7DQ
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Blinding maintained using the hand held controller (shows ON at all times) and programs which ensure equivalent battery drain at all stimulation settings. Pseudo-ON = a low power programme that provides 'sham stimulation' (high frequency, low amplitude stimulation generally ineffective at providing pain relief) and drains battery over time, requiring the participant to recharge the IPG periodically: around 250Hz, less than 0.5mA (with potential to be as low as 0mA), 450uS.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2024
First Posted
April 29, 2024
Study Start
August 7, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
November 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- When summary data are published or otherwise made available, requests will be considered, as per the plan (detailed in the CIP)
Prior to entering the study, participants will have consented to their non-identifiable research data being shared with or by third parties. Data will be de-identified, containing no personally identifiable data (PID). These data are radiological information, de-identified questionnaire or clinical data and electrical traces from the implantable pulse generator (Picostim). There is a plan to make individual participant data and related data dictionaries available on request. All clinical data will be presented at the end of the trial as data listings. These will be checked to confirm the lists accurately represents the data collected during the course of the trial. The clinical investigation data will then be locked and a final data listing produced. The clinical trial report will be based on the final data listings. The locked clinical investigation data may then be used for analysis and publication.