NCT06375421

Brief Summary

This is a pilot and feasibility study for a mobile phone-delivered intervention for memory, called MEMI (memory ecological momentary intervention), that was designed to support adults with chronic traumatic brain injury with their memory. The goal of the study is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of MEMI and to assess preliminary efficacy as to whether technology-delivered spaced memory retrieval opportunities improve memory in people with and without a history of chronic traumatic brain injury.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 3, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2024

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 19, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 2, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 2, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 6, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

April 8, 2024

Results QC Date

November 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

traumatic brain injurymemoryecological momentary intervention

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Acceptability

    Acceptability of Intervention Measure (4 = completely disagree/not acceptable - worse, 20 = completely agree/acceptable - better)

    1 week in each intervention condition

  • Feasibility (Engagement)

    Number of possible sessions that participants complete in each condition (min: 0 - worse, max: 2 for Blocked and 12 for MEMI - better)

    1 week in each intervention condition

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Free Recall of Word Forms

    1 week in each intervention condition

  • Cued Recall of Word Forms

    1 week in each intervention condition

  • Cued Recall of Word Meanings

    1 week in each intervention condition

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Spatial Contexts

    1 week in each intervention condition

Study Arms (2)

Intervention, then Active Comparator

OTHER

Participants complete the Intervention (MEMI spaced retrieval) week, followed by the Active Comparator (blocked retrieval) week.

Behavioral: MEMI (Memory Ecological Momentary Intervention) Spaced RetrievalBehavioral: Blocked Retrieval

Active Comparator, then Intervention

OTHER

Participants complete the Active Comparator (blocked retrieval) week, followed by the Intervention (MEMI spaced retrieval) week.

Behavioral: MEMI (Memory Ecological Momentary Intervention) Spaced RetrievalBehavioral: Blocked Retrieval

Interventions

Participants will complete their initial learning session on the target words, then immediately receive all of the exposures to each of the items in a single block. They do not complete any more retrieval sessions until one week later, when they complete a 15-minute test for their memory of all of the trained items.

Active Comparator, then InterventionIntervention, then Active Comparator

Participants complete their initial learning session, and the subsequent retrieval sessions are spaced out over the course of the week (two short retrieval sessions each day) using MEMI. Then, they complete a 15-minute test for their memory of all of the trained items at the end of the week.

Active Comparator, then InterventionIntervention, then Active Comparator

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • For participants with TBI:
  • Moderate-severe TBI. All participants were determined to have a history of moderate-severe TBI upon joining the Vanderbilt Brain Injury Patient Registry. This determination was made based on the Mayo Classification Scale.
  • All participants are at least 6 months post-injury at the time of study enrollment and thus exhibit chronic and stable neuropsychological profiles.
  • Age ranging from 18-60, to rule out developmental TBI and limit influence of age-related cognitive decline.
  • For all participants:
  • Oral and written language skills sufficient for the study tasks. This will be screened in the initial video conference contact with the participant, when consent is obtained.
  • Participants must own a smartphone to access the Gorilla online behavioral experiment platform from their mobile phones.

You may not qualify if:

  • For participants with TBI:
  • History of medical or neurological disease affecting the brain or language, before or after the qualifying TBI.
  • For non-injured comparison peers:
  • History of neurological or cognitive disability, including TBI
  • For all participants:
  • Any disability (e.g., vision impairment, hard of hearing, aphasia or other neurologic condition) that limits ability to read, type, or verbally communicate.
  • Demonstrates inability to receive and respond to a text message after training by study personnel.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries, Traumatic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain InjuriesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Limitations and Caveats

Although participants were not incentivized for engagement, they were compensated for providing feedback on their experience. Participants may have been reluctant to provide critical feedback, but they were encouraged to provide their honest opinions.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Emily Morrow
Organization
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Emily Morrow, Ph.D.

    Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The order of conditions and the order of word list presentation will be counterbalanced. The order of condition/word list combination will be pre-determined, and participants will be assigned to the next available combination based on when they join the study (i.e., a counterbalanced within-person crossover design).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Postdoctoral Research Fellow

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2024

First Posted

April 19, 2024

Study Start

April 3, 2024

Primary Completion

December 2, 2024

Study Completion

December 2, 2024

Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Results First Posted

January 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual participant data collected during the pilot trial will be de-identified and made available following publication of the results to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
Beginning 6 months after results publication. No end date.
Access Criteria
Approval of a proposal by the study PI.

Locations