Bone Evaluation by Ultrasound Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) vs Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
REMS Versus DXA for Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Evaluation
1 other identifier
interventional
296
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Bone Density Evaluation by means of the Ultrasound Technology Named Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS) in Comparison With DXA Technique. Clinical Center involved in the study:IRCCS Orthopedic institute Galeazzi - Sant'Ambrogio The clinical study will evaluate the intra- and inter-operator repeatability of the REMS,(Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry) ultrasound diagnostic technology implemented in the EchoStation device (Echolight Spa, Lecce) and the diagnostic accuracy in comparison with DXA (used as standard reference).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedSeptember 5, 2025
August 1, 2025
6.1 years
March 8, 2024
August 29, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. REMS Technology intra - and inter-operator repeatability Evaluation.
The Root Mean Square - Coefficient of Variation (CV-RMS) parameter has been measured in order to calculate REMS intra- and inter-operator repeatability.
up to 3 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of the REMS Technology in comparison with the conventional DXA technique.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
Study Arms (1)
Execution of additional diagnostic examination
OTHERThe proposed study is defined as interventional because it introduces an ultrasound examination in the standard clinical routine. The diagnostic approach does not vary during the study and the prescription of any therapeutic treatment is performed on the basis of the conventional DXA diagnosis. This ultrasound examination does not involve additional risks for the patient with the benefit of not using ionizing radiation; it lasts only few minutes and can be performed without moving the patient from the same bed on which he is already positioned for DXA examination.
Interventions
The proposed study is defined as interventional because it introduces an ultrasound examination in the standard clinical routine. The diagnostic approach does not vary during the study and the prescription of any therapeutic treatment is performed on the basis of the conventional DXA diagnosis. This ultrasound examination does not involve additional risks for the patient with the benefit of not using ionizing radiation; it lasts only few minutes and can be performed without moving the patient from the same bed on which he is already positioned for DXA examination.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients scheduled for lumbar and/or femoral DXA examination,
- female sex,
- age range 30-80 years (for repeatability study), age range 50-70 years (for accuracy study),
- absence of severe obesity (BMI \< 40 kg/m2),
- absence of severe walking difficulties,
- cognitive underwriting of informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Male sex,
- severe walking difficulties,
- age below 30 years or over 80 years,
- severe obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m2),
- declared pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Paola Pisanilead
- I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogiocollaborator
Study Sites (1)
I.R.C.C.S Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio
Milan, MI, 20157, Italy
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Luca M. Sconfienza, Professor
IRCCS
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2024
First Posted
April 17, 2024
Study Start
November 19, 2019
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
September 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share