Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs. Standard of Care for Emergency Department (ED) Procedural Sedation in the Older Adult
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if intranasal dexmedetomidine could be an alternative to the current standard of care (injectable benzodiazepines or antipsychotics) for sedation prior to computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in those greater than or equal to 65 years of age (older adults) that are seen in the Emergency Department (ED).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedApril 22, 2024
April 1, 2024
12 months
April 12, 2024
April 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sedation
The primary outcome is to determine if intranasal dexmedetomidine is as effective in producing moderate sedation on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAAS) as standard of care intravenous medications in older adults. The minimum value on the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale is 0 and the maximum value is 5. Lower scores mean a worse outcome.
Within one hour of administration
Study Arms (3)
Lorazepam
ACTIVE COMPARATORHaloperidol
ACTIVE COMPARATORIN Dex
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age and older
- Patients in need of sedation prior to either a computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who weigh \< 50 kg
- Cardiac arrhythmias or QTc \>450
- Intravenous access not standard of care or unable to obtain
- Patients with any allergies or contraindications to dexmedetomidine, haloperidol (i.e. patients diagnosed with Parkinson's) or lorazepam
- Patients with low blood pressure, defined as a less than 100/60 mmHg
- Patients with bradycardia (Heart rate \< 60 bpm)
- Patients presenting with chief complaint of respiratory distress/failure
- Intranasal administration contradictions: nasal septal abnormalities, nasal trauma, epistaxis, excessive nasal mucus or blood, and intranasal damage, recent use of nasally administered vasoconstrictors such as cocaine, oxymetazoline, and phenylephrine
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (11)
Kennedy M, Koehl J, Gao J, Ciampa KA, Hayes BD, Camargo CA Jr. Use of antipsychotic and sedative medications in older patients in the emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Mar;70(3):731-742. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17590. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
PMID: 34820831RESULTTobias JD, Leder M. Procedural sedation: A review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011 Oct;5(4):395-410. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.87270.
PMID: 22144928RESULTKienitz R, Kay L, Beuchat I, Gelhard S, von Brauchitsch S, Mann C, Lucaciu A, Schafer JH, Siebenbrodt K, Zollner JP, Schubert-Bast S, Rosenow F, Strzelczyk A, Willems LM. Benzodiazepines in the Management of Seizures and Status Epilepticus: A Review of Routes of Delivery, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability. CNS Drugs. 2022 Sep;36(9):951-975. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00940-2. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
PMID: 35971024RESULTAmore M, D'Andrea M, Fagiolini A. Treatment of Agitation With Lorazepam in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 22;12:628965. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628965. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33692709RESULTYuen VM, Hui TW, Irwin MG, Yao TJ, Chan L, Wong GL, Shahnaz Hasan M, Shariffuddin II. A randomised comparison of two intranasal dexmedetomidine doses for premedication in children. Anaesthesia. 2012 Nov;67(11):1210-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07309.x. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
PMID: 22950484RESULTBaumgartner K, Groff V, Yaeger LH, Fuller BM. The use of dexmedetomidine in the emergency department: A systematic review. Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;30(3):196-208. doi: 10.1111/acem.14636. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
PMID: 36448276RESULTBarends CRM, Driesens MK, Struys MMRF, Visser A, Absalom AR. Intranasal dexmedetomidine in elderly subjects with or without beta blockade: a randomised double-blind single-ascending-dose cohort study. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Apr;124(4):411-419. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.025. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
PMID: 32029262RESULTPastis NJ, Hill NT, Yarmus LB, Schippers F, Imre M, Sohngen W, Randall O, Callahan SP, Silvestri GA. Correlation of Vital Signs and Depth of Sedation by Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAA/S) Scale in Bronchoscopy. J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2022 Jan 1;29(1):54-61. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000784.
PMID: 34238838RESULTUusalo P, Seppanen SM, Jarvisalo MJ. Feasibility of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine in Treatment of Postoperative Restlessness, Agitation, and Pain in Geriatric Orthopedic Patients. Drugs Aging. 2021 May;38(5):441-450. doi: 10.1007/s40266-021-00846-6. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
PMID: 33728561RESULTGupta A, Dalvi NP, Tendolkar BA. Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal midazolam as premedication for brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: A prospective randomized double blind trial. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):236-240. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_204_16.
PMID: 28781452RESULTSinnott J, Holthaus CV, Ablordeppey E, Wessman BT, Roberts BW, Fuller BM. The Use of Dexmedetomidine in the Emergency Department: A Cohort Study. West J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 22;22(5):1202-1209. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50917.
PMID: 34546899RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
William Paolo, MD
State University of New York - Upstate Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2024
First Posted
April 17, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 31, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
April 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share