Establishing Personalized Phage Therapy and Its Comparative Cost in Difficult-to-treat Infections (EPHICACI)
EPHICACI
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
EPHICACI is a multicenter, prospective study that continues and expands the monocentric PHAGEFORCE registry initiated at UZ Leuven. In Belgium, phage therapy can be applied as standard-of-care only in patients with difficult-to-treat infections where no curative antibiotic and/or surgical alternatives are available ('last-resort cases'). A multidisciplinary phage task force, the Coordination group for Bacteriophage therapy Leuven (CBL), evaluates eligible patients, tests pathogen susceptibility, and sets up standardized treatment protocols. With EPHICACI, this approach is extended to multiple Belgian expert centers to increase patient enrollment while upholding stringent eligibility criteria. The study aims to gain insight into the safety, efficacy, biodistribution and mechanisms of action of phage therapy, and to optimize its use across five medical disciplines (with distinct routes of administration). In addition, EPHICACI integrates machine learning-based phage-bacteria interaction analyses to guide personalized phage selection, and includes health economic evaluations to support evidence-based implementation and reimbursement strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2029
September 21, 2026
August 1, 2026
7.6 years
April 4, 2024
September 15, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Disease-free period
In MSI patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Smell test
16-point Sniffin' Sticks test in CRS patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Radiological scores
Lund-Mackay CT score in CRS patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Endoscopic scores
Lund-Kennedy score and Modified Davos score in CRS patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Time to clearance of infection
In patients with Persistent Bacteremia
Until 1 year after treatment, daily during hospitalization until infection clearance
Overall survival
Does the patient survive (for patients with Persistent Bacteremia)
Until 1 year after treatment
SOFA score
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score in patients with persistent bacteremia, assessed to monitor changes in organ dysfunction during hospitalization.
Baseeline and daily during hospitalization until discharge, for up to 12 weeks after cessation of phage therapy; thereafter at 6 months and 1 year after cessation of phage therapy.
Tolerance of the intervention
Proportion of patients with chronic pulmonary infection able to complete the planned phage therapy without treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions or pulmonary exacerbations.
During scheduled phage therapy (up to 6 weeks)
Sputum culture conversion assessed by microbiological culture
Proportion of patients with chronic pulmonary infection with conversion from a positive sputum culture for the targeted bacterial pathogen at baseline to a negative sputum culture for the targeted bacterial pathogen after phage therapy.
Days 1-4 of phage therapy, weekly during phage therapy for up to 6 weeks, and at 6 and 12 months after completion of phage therapy.
Within-subject change in the number of positive cultures
In patients with Chronic Pulmonary Infection
At 6 and 12 months compared to 12 months prior to therapy
Within-subject change in the number of pulmonary exacerbations requiring additional antibiotic therapy or hospitalization.
In patients with Chronic Pulmonary Infection
At 6 and 12 months
Clinical response measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC).
In patients with Chronic Pulmonary Infection
Until 1 year after treatment
Improvement in IHS4 score
In HS patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Improvement in ANF count using HiSCR50 and HiSCR75
In HS patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Reduction in flare incidence compared to the 12 weeks prior to treatment.
In HS patients
Until 1 year after treatment
Bacterial load in sinonasal material measured by quantitative microbiological culture
Bacterial load of the targeted bacterial pathogen in sinonasal samples from CRS patients quantified by microbiological culture and expressed as colony-forming units (CFU).
Until 1 year after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (18)
PROMIS global health
until 1 year after treatment
PROMIS pain interference
until 1 year after treatment
PROMIS physical function
until 1 year after treatment
iMCQ
until 1 year after treatment
iPCQ
until 1 year after treatment
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Phage treated group
Patients whose isolated pathogens are susceptible to the available phages and who have no alternative curative treatment options are included in the phage-treated group. The local phage hub, in consultation with the Phage Consortium, will design the phage therapy treatment plan (local, inhalation, or intravenous) on top of standard surgical and/or antimicrobial care. The treatment plan is documented in the patient's medical file. Patients undergo monitoring according to the phage therapy protocol and follow-up according to standard care for phage-treated patients.
Control group
Patients whose isolated pathogens are not susceptible to available phages, or for whom phage therapy is not indicated, are included in the control group. These patients receive standard surgical and/or antimicrobial care as determined by the local phage hub. Monitoring and follow-up are according to the standard of care for the underlying pathology.
Interventions
Prospective data collection prior to, during and after phage treatment.
Prospective data collection prior to, during and after standard infection treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients: * Diagnosed with an MSI or CRS or persistent bacteremia or or pulmonary infection (cystic fibrosis/bronchiectasis) or HS and * For whom all previous treatments (surgical and antibiotic) have failed or for whom no other treatment options are available (i.e., last resort cases, based on the assessment of the local phage hub), for example in case of bacterial resistance. And * Of whom the pathogen causative for the infection is one for which phages are available in the phage bank, and * Who have given informed consent to have their data collected in a patient registry.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with an MSI or CRS or persistent bacteremia or pulmonary infection (cystic fibrosis/bronchiectasis) or HS and
- For whom all previous treatments (surgical and antibiotic) have failed or for whom no other treatment options are available (i.e., last resort cases, based on the assessment of the local phage hub), for example in case of bacterial resistance. And
- Of whom the pathogen causative for the infection is one for which phages are available in the phage bank, and
- Who have given informed consent to have their data collected in a patient registry
You may not qualify if:
- All patients:
- With an infectious disease other than those mentioned above, and/or
- For whom standard treatment alternatives are still available. And/or
- Of whom the pathogen causative for the infection is not one for which phages are available in the phage bank. And/or
- Who refused to give their informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Antwerpcollaborator
- University Ghentcollaborator
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brusselcollaborator
- AZ Sint-Jan AVcollaborator
- Queen Astrid Military Hospitalcollaborator
- Sciensanocollaborator
- Clinique Saint Pierre Ottigniescollaborator
- Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuvenlead
- KU Leuvencollaborator
- Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvaincollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Related Publications (1)
Onsea J, Uyttebroek S, Chen B, Wagemans J, Lood C, Van Gerven L, Spriet I, Devolder D, Debaveye Y, Depypere M, Dupont L, De Munter P, Peetermans WE, van Noort V, Merabishvili M, Pirnay JP, Lavigne R, Metsemakers WJ. Bacteriophage Therapy for Difficult-to-Treat Infections: The Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Phage Task Force (The PHAGEFORCE Study Protocol). Viruses. 2021 Aug 5;13(8):1543. doi: 10.3390/v13081543.
PMID: 34452408BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Willem-Jan Metsemakers, MD, PhD
UZ / KU Leuven
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Year
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2024
First Posted
April 16, 2024
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Last Updated
September 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-08