Outcome of Plastibell Circumcision Versus Open Method Circumcision
Comparison of Outcome of Plastibell Circumcision Method With Open Surgical Technique in Infants Presenting at Tertiary Care Hospital
1 other identifier
interventional
174
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the outcomes of plastibell circumcision method with open surgical technique in infants presenting at tertiary care hospital. Methods This randomized controlled trial (NCT??) was conducted at Pediatric surgery department, the Children's hospital and the University of Child health, Lahore. Study was carried out over a period of six months from 11-01-2022 to 11-07-2022. Non probability, purposive sampling was used. 174 infants presenting for circumcision were admitted and assigned a method of circumcision randomly. They were randomly divided in to 2 groups by using opaque sealed envelope technique. Infants in group A were underwent plastibell circumcision while infants in group B were underwent open technique circumcision. 87 circumcisions were performed by each method. The informed consent was taken from parents for inclusion into the study. All infants were underwent circumcision under local anesthesia as per assigned method. Same preoperative, per-operative, and postoperative care was given to each regardless of the technique. These patients were followed for 3 hours to assess bleeding as per operational definition. Then followed on an outpatient basis every 6th day until complete healing is achieved (30 days).The data regarding age, weight, duration of procedure, wound infection and post circumcision bleeding was recorded in a predesigned performa. (As per operational definition).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 11, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 11, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 16, 2024
CompletedApril 16, 2024
April 1, 2024
6 months
April 8, 2024
April 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
infection
incidence of surgical site infection according to southampton score
30 days
Study Arms (2)
Plastibell group
EXPERIMENTALplastibell method applied for circumcision
open method circumcision
EXPERIMENTALopen method of circumcision applied
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all uncircumcised male
You may not qualify if:
- hypospadias, syndromic children
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Children Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province, 42000, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhammad A Ashiq, M.S
The Children hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- outcome assessor is unaware of group allocated
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2024
First Posted
April 16, 2024
Study Start
January 11, 2022
Primary Completion
July 11, 2022
Study Completion
August 11, 2022
Last Updated
April 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no plan of sharing