NCT06366022

Brief Summary

Microsurgical coronally advanced tunnel procedures using subepithelial connective tissue grafts (sCTG) are predictable for healing of multiple adjacent type 1 and 2 gingival recessions (RT1 and RT2). In order to reduce patient morbidity and enhance periodontal wound healing with sCTG can be used. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the modified tunneling technique with subepithelial connective tissue graft in gingival recessions placed with the inner side towards the flap cover graft and the outer side towards the flap cover graft.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
21

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 10, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 14, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 14, 2026

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

April 10, 2024

Results QC Date

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

tunneling technique

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Percent Change in Gingival Recession (Mean Root Coverage, MRC)

    Mean root coverage (MRC) was calculated as the percent change in gingival recession height from baseline to 6 months using the formula: (GR0 - GR6) / GR0 × 100%. * GR-gingival recession height: distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the gingival margin at the mid-buccal side * GR0- before surgery * GR6- 6 months after surgery

    Baseline and 6 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • GR Change (Gingival Recession Height Change) GT Change (Gingival Thickness) KTW Change (Keratinized Tissue Width)

    6 months after surgery

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Root Coverage Esthetic Score (RES)

    6 months after surgery

Study Arms (2)

The tunnel technique for root coverage with CTG with outer side of the graft

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Procedure: A modified microsurgical tunnel technique. Initial sulcular incisions with a microsurgical blade are followed by a full-thickness buccal flap preparations till muco-gingival junction using the tunneling knives. Subsequently, the split-thickness preparation is extended into the mucosal tissue to gain sufficient flap mobility. The papillary regions are detached in their buccal aspects with the periosteum. The graft is inserted the /inner outer side into the tunnel and stabilized with absorbable suspensory sutures. The buccal flap is advanced coronally and stabilized with non-absorbable suspensory sutures. 21 participants were enrolled into the study, as it was designed to be a split mouth study

Procedure: The tunnel technique for root coverage with CTG with outer side of the graft

The tunnel technique for root coverage with CTG with inner side of the graft

EXPERIMENTAL

Procedure: A modified microsurgical tunnel technique. Initial sulcular incisions with a microsurgical blade are followed by a full-thickness buccal flap preparations till muco-gingival junction using the tunneling knives. Subsequently, the split-thickness preparation is extended into the mucosal tissue to gain sufficient flap mobility. The papillary regions are detached in their buccal aspects with the periosteum. The graft is inserted the /inner outer side into the tunnel and stabilized with absorbable suspensory sutures. The buccal flap is advanced coronally and stabilized with non-absorbable suspensory sutures. 21 participants were enrolled into the study, as it was designed to be a split mouth study.

Procedure: The tunnel technique for root coverage with CTG with inner side of the graft

Interventions

Tunnel technique for root coverage with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG). A split-thickness mucogingival tunnel will be prepared without vertical releasing incisions. The CTG will be inserted into the tunnel and positioned so that the inner (deep) side of the graft faces the inner surface of the flap (standardized graft orientation). The graft will be stabilized with sutures, and the flap will be coronally advanced to completely cover the graft.

The tunnel technique for root coverage with CTG with inner side of the graft

Tunnel technique for root coverage with a subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG). A split-thickness mucogingival tunnel will be prepared without vertical releasing incisions. The CTG will be inserted into the tunnel and positioned so that the outer side of the graft faces the inner surface of the flap. The graft will be stabilized with sutures, and the flap will be coronally advanced to completely cover the graft.

The tunnel technique for root coverage with CTG with outer side of the graft

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Bilateral multiple gingival recessions in homologous teeth in the same arch.

You may not qualify if:

  • Full-mouth plaque index ≥ 20% (Ainamo \& Bay 1975)
  • Full-mouth sulcus bleeding index ≥ 15% (Mühlemann \& Son 1971)
  • Smoking
  • Systemic diseases with compromised healing potential of infectious diseases
  • Drugs affecting periodontal health / healing
  • Pregnant and lactating females
  • Previous periodontal surgery in the area

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw

Warsaw, MAzowsze, 00-246, Poland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gingival DiseasesPeriodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesPeriodontal Atrophy

Results Point of Contact

Title
dr Bartłomiej Górski
Organization
Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases of Medical University of Warsaw

Study Officials

  • Bartłomiej Górski, PhD

    Department of Periodontology and Oral Mucosa Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 10, 2024

First Posted

April 15, 2024

Study Start

May 30, 2024

Primary Completion

November 30, 2024

Study Completion

November 30, 2025

Last Updated

May 14, 2026

Results First Posted

May 14, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-11

Locations